Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

APS life or death
Old 10-21-2004   #1
momosgarage
Registered User
 
momosgarage is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19
APS life or death

I have a chance to get a APS SLR, which is actually quite small. At first I thought RF, but its a slr. How long do you guys thinks APS film will be made? I think longer than most expect because a a lot of photo labs invested in APS developers. From what i've been told they were quite expensive and some have not been paid off yet. I think they might make a big stink if the film was not produced anymore (after all 110 film still exists). I intend to get the aps film developed without prints. I have a scan dual II with the aps adapter and I wouldn't mind trying it out. I 'll bet shooting APS with the intention of scanning will give quite good results and be pretty cheap. What do you guys think, could APS have done better if it was sold as a product to be scanned and photoshop edited?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #2
MP Guy
Just another face in the crowd
 
MP Guy's Avatar
 
MP Guy is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,391
Read this ...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0401/04011301kodakfilm.asp
__________________
-- Jorge Torralba

Developer of the RFF gallery Software.

My Gallery on Ag2Si - SilverToSilicon
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #3
Roman
Registered User
 
Roman's Avatar
 
Roman is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
Age: 41
Posts: 1,317
Well, I believe APS is already dead - no more new cameras, few films available, the were focussed at the same customers that are now using digital compacts; kinda like disc cameras; film might be available for a few more years, but I would not bet on it...
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=691'>My Gallery</a>

My Flickr gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #4
DougK
This space left blank
 
DougK's Avatar
 
DougK is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Westlake, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 1,478
Depends on the price of the SLR. If it's cheap enough, go ahead and get it, it'll be a fun toy to play with. Like I mentioned elsewhere on these forums, I have two APS cameras and I intend to keep shooting them. If the film supply eventually runs out, well, I still have 35mm and MF to play with :-)
I seem to recall seeing a trade mag article posted to the web somewhere not too long ago that Olympus marketed their cameras with scanners for a time, I'll have to see if I can track down the reference.

Doug K.

Doug K.
__________________
Doug K.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #5
momosgarage
Registered User
 
momosgarage is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19
The article hits on what I said. Retailers have made big investments in APS, will they let it die without a fight? Super-8 cameras have not been made in a long time, but film is still sold by kodak. Even fuji still make single-8 film. Single-8 and super-8 combined have a smaller worldwide user base than APS. So, what about scanning? APS film is pretty cheap in bulk. Could APS have done better if it was sold as a product to be scanned and photoshop edited?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #6
DougK
This space left blank
 
DougK's Avatar
 
DougK is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Westlake, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 1,478
I knew I'd find the reference...

http://www.worldofphoto.com/pdf-Arch...ic02_06_15.pdf

Doug K.
__________________
Doug K.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #7
DougK
This space left blank
 
DougK's Avatar
 
DougK is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Westlake, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 1,478
My $0.02 worth...

I think digital cameras got cheap enough for acceptable photo quality much more quickly than anyone anticipated, otherwise APS might have done better. Also, it probably would have helped if the first generation cameras would have been of better quality out of the gate. The quality showed up, but only after a bad impression had already been formed in people's minds. Just think how pocketable a fixed-lens manual RF could have been...

Doug K.
__________________
Doug K.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #8
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
Remember that 126 is really 35mm film and 110 is 16mm film. They can be hand processed in small quantities. Capital investment in expensive processing machinery can be stranded very quickly. I wonder how much Kodak really cares with their bottomline sagging as badly as it must be.

Have a good time while the film is still around. I'm going to retire my Instamatic 500 (126) and Pocket Instamatic 60 (110) after I use up my dwindling stocks of Verichrome Pan. I'm astonished that there are still supplies of 127 film around for my Yashica 44.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2004   #9
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,855
I think the APS SLRs will be collectors items some day worth lots of money.



Anyone want to buy a Canon IX?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-22-2004   #10
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
Just like Disc cameras?

The only 126 camera swith any value above the "junk" level seems to be the Contaflex 126 plus any 126 still in its original box with with instructions and accessories.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-22-2004   #11
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally posted by pshinkaw
Just like Disc cameras?

The only 126 camera swith any value above the "junk" level seems to be the Contaflex 126 plus any 126 still in its original box with with instructions and accessories.

-Paul
Try to buy one of the Rollei 126 cameras the next time you see one on eb*y.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-22-2004   #12
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
True, There seem to be so few I forgot about them. You do mean the Rollei SLR model right? I have one of the collapsing brick shaped viewfinder models, but it had junk status even when 126 was still widely available.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Death of a Digital Camera COOL PHOTOS! bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 20 11-10-2005 05:38
New J-8, Life is Good fraley FSU Former Soviet Union RF 19 03-25-2005 21:16
real life temptation Pherdinand Rangefinder Photography Discussion 15 09-23-2004 03:21
Life with the new Bessa R2 JohnM Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 11 09-01-2004 02:26
Bringing them back to life... Rich Silfver Other RF 9 03-14-2004 03:01



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:29.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.