lens hood question

back alley · 10-19-2004

Canon Rangefinder lens hood S - 60

anyone know what this fits onto?

joe

or a resource that could tell me?

VictorM. · 10-19-2004

I have an S-50 that fits the 50/1.4 Canon so perhaps the S-60 fits the 50/1.2. It seems as though S=Standard, T=Telephoto and W=Wide when it comes to Canon rf hoods. Some of the later hoods also fit the early slr lenses of the same focal length.

back alley · 10-19-2004

thanks victor!

and welcome to the forum.

joe

VictorM. · 10-20-2004

Thanks for the welcome, Joe. I forgor that was my first post here. I also forgot to point out that the Canon hood size is indicated as 2mm larger than the filter thread size because they mostly clip on.

back alley · 10-20-2004

oh that's good info.
doubtful i need it for any of my lenses then.

joe

Sonnar · 10-23-2004

The Canon 1.2/50 has a 55mm filter, so I doubt the S-60 will fit. Stephen Gandy has a good overview of filter and hood sizes at http://www.cameraquest.com/crflen.htm
I remember the 50/1.2 has a hood with holes corresponding to the rangefinder window...
I think it will fit some of the Canon_FL (SLR) lenses of the 60's, maybe the 58/1.2

regards Frank

back alley · 10-23-2004

gandy's chart is wrong - according to canon museum site.
he has the 135/3.5 listed as 40 mm filter size - canon says it's 48.

who do we believe?
oh, wait a minute- my 135/3.5 takes a 48mm filter!

i wonder if the hood size (t 50) is correct or not?
i don't have one of them.

joe

VictorM. · 10-24-2004

I think Sonnar is right-I didn't take the time to check the Canon Museum for more info before posting. Another good place to check is kevincameras site-they have Canon hoods at apallingly high prices but with useful pictures to look at. The T-50 will likely fit telephoto lenses with 48mm screw threads. As far as length of the hood goes, I've found most hoods to be too short. For example, I have often put the hood from an 85mm Nikkor on to a 55mm micro Nikkor without vignetting. I've also made hoods for uncommon lenses and rarely had problems with too much length.

back alley · 10-24-2004

kevincameras is very $$$ indeed!

i eventually found a 48mm rubber hood locally which i swapped with the metal canon hood i had on my old canonet, also fitting 48mm but with a set screw. it fits great and looks good too.
i will have to take some pics to see if it actually works or not.

joe

Sonnar · 10-24-2004

I have a T60-2 which I use on my 1.8/85, but I believe it's for the 2.5/135. Gandy says a T60 should be right; but I didn't see one recently. I found no vignetting, but didn't use it with the hood wide open.

Russ · 10-24-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo

i eventually found a 48mm rubber hood locally which i swapped with the metal canon hood i had on my old canonet, also fitting 48mm but with a set screw. it fits great and looks good too.
i will have to take some pics to see if it actually works or not.

joe

Joe

I've put those metal "Vivitar" lens hoods on all of my rangefinders. They work great. I then just use a cheap generic 52mm, or Kiron lens cap. They fit perfectly. No need to ever remove the hood, except when changing from 81-A to deep yellow filter, for B/W shooting.

Russ

back alley · 10-24-2004

i only use lens caps for storage in one of my camera cases, never when i'm out shooting. that's the first thing to get lost out there.

i like the rubber lens hoods ok. they offer some protection i.e. shock absorbtion and seem to keep the stray light out to boot.
the metal shades look better however.
the shade i had on the canonet is a metal canon shade made for the canonet series of cameras but it fits & looks great on the 135 lens too.

i need to buy a p&s digital so i can took quick snaps of stuff like this.

joe

Russ · 10-24-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo
i only use lens caps for storage in one of my camera cases, never when i'm out shooting. that's the first thing to get lost out there.

i like the rubber lens hoods ok. they offer some protection i.e. shock absorbtion and seem to keep the stray light out to boot.
the metal shades look better however.
the shade i had on the canonet is a metal canon shade made for the canonet series of cameras but it fits & looks great on the 135 lens too.

i need to buy a p&s digital so i can took quick snaps of stuff like this.

joe

Joe

The rubber ones that I have seen for rangefinders, have been so wide, that they block the focusing patch and viewfinder. The metal one's I just leave on at all times.

Yes, a digital P&S has often crossed my mind for the exact same reason. Maybe a Nikon D70...

Russ

back alley · 10-24-2004

russ,
this particular shade does interfere a touch with the finder but i think the focussing is ok.
if i 'run into' a metal one i'll pick it up but i doubt i'll look too hard for now.

i know so little about p&s digital - i'll have to investigate all over again as i've forgotten what i learned about specific models and they have most likely changed anyway.

joe

Russ · 10-24-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo
russ,
this particular shade does interfere a touch with the finder but i think the focussing is ok.
if i 'run into' a metal one i'll pick it up but i doubt i'll look too hard for now.

i know so little about p&s digital - i'll have to investigate all over again as i've forgotten what i learned about specific models and they have most likely changed anyway.

joe

Joe

What size would you want in metal? I'll look around this Saturday at the camera show.

Russ

back alley · 10-24-2004

it'a 48mm for the canon.

could you look for 43.5mm also? (i need 2 of those- oly 35rc)
metal or rubber or plastic, no matter.

thanks a bunch,
joe

Russ · 10-24-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo
it'a 48mm for the canon.

could you look for 43.5mm also? (i need 2 of those- oly 35rc)
metal or rubber or plastic, no matter.

thanks a bunch,
joe

Joe

The 48mm is no problem. However, I had to get one of the Oly made 43.5mm hoods made exclusively for the Oly RC, by Olympus. Got it new @ $5.00 Consider the 48mm a done deal. The Oly 43.5, I'll keep on the lookout for.

Russ

back alley · 10-24-2004

great!

joe

Russ · 10-29-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo
russ,
this particular shade does interfere a touch with the finder but i think the focussing is ok.
if i 'run into' a metal one i'll pick it up but i doubt i'll look too hard for now.

i know so little about p&s digital - i'll have to investigate all over again as i've forgotten what i learned about specific models and they have most likely changed anyway.

joe

Joe

I will be attending the camera show tomorrow morning. Did you want 48mm metal lens hood for your Canonet GIII QL-17? Is that size compatible with a few different Canon lenses?

Russ

back alley · 10-29-2004

russ, that would be great!
yes, 48 fits not only the canonet but 2 of my ltm canon lenses also. i have an actual canonet hood that i'm using on the 135 right now.
so, bottom line, if you find 2 hoods in 48, one being good for a tele lens, i would appreciate you getting both. if not one would be great.
just let me know what the damage is and i'll send you a money order.

joe

Russ · 10-29-2004

Quote:

Originally posted by backalley photo
russ, that would be great!
yes, 48 fits not only the canonet but 2 of my ltm canon lenses also. i have an actual canonet hood that i'm using on the 135 right now.
so, bottom line, if you find 2 hoods in 48, one being good for a tele lens, i would appreciate you getting both. if not one would be great.
just let me know what the damage is and i'll send you a money order.

joe

Joe

No charge, on the house. Hey, do you ever use XP-2? I have some of the Fuji Neopan 400CN, which is almost identical to the XP-2. I'll toss a couple in the mail, if you'd like. It's pretty much like XP-2, just a tad more contrast. Hey, give me your personal E address. DAMMIT!

Russ

back alley · 10-29-2004

sounds great!
i use xp2 all the time.
i hope to change back to delta films when i get my own scanner but for now xp2 plus my lab works great.
i'll p. m. you my info.

joe