Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Miscellaneous Topics and more > Provide your Feedback

Provide your Feedback This area should address site improvements and other topics related to the site.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Opinions solicited - Olympus PEN F
Old 01-23-2006   #1
Joseph Low
Registered User
 
Joseph Low is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
Opinions solicited - Olympus PEN F

I would appreciate comments and/or suggestions regarding this old standard

Thanks / Joseph Low
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #2
micek
Registered User
 
micek is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
If in good condition they are nice shooters. Well built and compact, beautifully designed. The Pen F has a brighter viewfinder (no meter) than the Pen FT (metered). With modern emulsions the half frame negatives can be easily printed up to 8x10. I found the shutter a bit louder than my OM1n's.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #3
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,168
I have several, FTs, and various fixed lens models, EE, EE-S2, etc. I absolutely love them. The Fs are approximately the same size as a Leica M and the lenses are outstanding. As Micek said, well built, compact, beautifully designed, and great shooters.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #4
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,832
Ditto to what's already been said.

They're great little cameras. I like the meterless F & FV, as they have the brighter VFs as micek noted. The FV is rarer & more expensive than the F, but is supposed to have a better shutter (1/500th on my F is hit-or-miss, mostly miss). If you want a respected mechanic's view, you might want to ping John Hermanson of Camtech Photo Services (omtech(at)erols.com).

Some people look down on the lenses, but they seem to be pretty good to me & fully comparable to other high-quality 1960s lenses (e.g., Canon RF, etc.).
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #5
Film dino
David Chong
 
Film dino's Avatar
 
Film dino is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 589
Hello Joesph,
If you havent already seen it this thread has some opinions on the Pen F
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...ad.php?t=13839
Cheers
David
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #6
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
I have an FT and it is a little disconcerting to have 72 negatives on a roll and to try and pick out the ones you want to enlarge or just to enlarge all of them. Somehow a 24 exposure roll forces one to be more discriminating in making exposures.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #7
Stephanie Brim
Mental Experimental.
 
Stephanie Brim's Avatar
 
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
If you have the chance to pick one up, do so. I have some film from a Canon Demi sitting at Wal-Mart (ugh, I know) right now that I had scanned. Had to test it out.
__________________

I had a baby girl on December 6, 2007. Yay motherhood!


One camera. Two lenses. Three shots per week.

2008 Street Photography Project
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #8
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
It may be just the right format for getting the negatives scanned without making prints. You get about 72-76 scanned images from which you can pick and choose which image you want to have printed. I have the FT and like it very much. I only have two lenses for it though;
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #9
dreilly
Chillin' in Geneva
 
dreilly's Avatar
 
dreilly is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Finger Lakes Region of New York State
Posts: 1,021
I had an F for a while and liked it. It did take forever to get through 72 frames, but that's good for encouraging bracketing and just taking lots of shots. I tried to think in terms of "photo pairs" too, in other words, taking two shots of someone in rapid succession and looking for nice resonance between the two photos. That's kind of fun. I also found it easy to work with half frame at my local Eckerd's...they scanned them two at a time and printed them two side by side. Not so tough.
__________________
-D is for Doug

http://www.flickr.com/photos/xenar/collections/

No place is boring, if you've had a good night's sleep and have a pocket full of unexposed film. ~Robert Adams, Darkroom & Creative Camera Techniques, May 1995 (I suppose that should now read: "and have a full battery and an empty memory card." Though that sounds so dull.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #10
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,171
My camera repair guy, who has worked on my two FTs and one FV, says the feel of the film wind will never be as smooth as it should be due to the transport design, where he thinks they made some cheap decisions. One issue is that the rotary shutter's axis is horizontal (fore and aft) so there's a right-angle gear train needed to cock it. I've had various troubles with all three and the FV has a chronic but variable problem with wide frame spacing. The FT with the frame counter problem had other internal problems too, solved by a major transplant of innards from a donor FT that had an ugly exterior. Good parts are getting hard to find for these little sweeties!
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #11
DougK
This space left blank
 
DougK's Avatar
 
DougK is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Westlake, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 1,478
It's pretty amazing what you can do in half-frame given today's films. Very little quality difference between it and regular 35mm when I scanned shots from my Samurai on my flatbed... I'm sure I can do even better now that I have a film scanner.
__________________
Doug K.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #12
DougK
This space left blank
 
DougK's Avatar
 
DougK is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Westlake, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 1,478
Before I forget, very nice shots, Roland.
__________________
Doug K.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #13
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 3,679
The small size of the Pen F system was extraordinary when it was originally introduced in 1963. The Pro model was just a black FT with the small pancake 35/2.8. A motordrive prototype was shown, but never marketed.

it is still a bit surprising this was the only system interchangeable lens 35mm half frame designed as a half frame -- not just a full frame with a half frame film gate.

Don't forget how adaptable the system is to other 35mm SLR lenses. Olympus offered adapters for Nikon F, Pentax 42, Exakta, and Olympus OM lenses.

an old CQ page at http://cameraquest.com/olypenf.htm will eventually be updated with lots of new pics. I currently seeking the nice examples of the 70/2 and the 400/6.3.


I hope to offer authorized reprints of Peter Dechert's excellent Pen F booklet. No final decision from Peter yet.

today the Pen F system prices are surprizingly holding their own in this digital world -- so there seems to be more than a fair share of Oly Pen F / FT / FT users and collectors.

the Gene Smith Olympus Pen F ad is my favorite camera/photog ad of all time.

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #14
lkgroup
Registered User
 
lkgroup's Avatar
 
lkgroup is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 286
I had several Pens , fixed lens models, EE, S Models I loved them also. I wish I still had them, but that was years ago.

Leo
__________________
my Flickr

Eastman Double-X Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/lchristoffer/


FS Leitz AFLOO Film Winder -new-

FS Contax IIa with Zeiss 50 1.5 CLA by Henry Scherer
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #15
biomed
WIIIIDE ANGLE
 
biomed's Avatar
 
biomed is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle Area (North)
Age: 66
Posts: 915
I have a Pen F that was given to me along with a 38/1.8 and a 70/2 lens. Everything is in great shape. It turns that the Pen F is a medical model and has a focusing screen with a cross hair and a round mask. This was designed to be used with microscopes and medical endoscopes (for peering into places we would not want peered into). I haven't tried run any film through it yet. I may see about having the mask removed as this is a camera that I have lusted after for a long time. I could have bought one new when they were still available, but for some reason decided not to. When I was in the Air Force, I new a fellow that used a Pen F for making film strips ... anyone remember those?
__________________
Biomed
Things are more like they are now than they’ve ever been before.

Photos

rff Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2006   #16
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,171
Biomed, I understand there were several variations of the F series for different medical and other scientific use. My FV was one such, but has a normal focusing screen. Some have the crosshairs and round mask you mention, and from what I've read these have a clear screen with no frosted focusing area. I also hear that Pen F screens are not interchangeable, so I don't know if the mask is removable either. I'd like to hear your experiences running a short test roll through that camera...
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-24-2006   #17
Joseph Low
Registered User
 
Joseph Low is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
I am greatly overwhelmed by the plethora of kind replies, advice and suggestions from RFF members - in response to my request re Olympus PEN F

Please accept my sincere thanks

Joseph Low / Singapore
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-24-2006   #18
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,841
Stephen: Thanks for the memory of the Gene Smith/Pen ad; wow, I'd forgotten about that, but it was a beautiful piece of work.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-01-2006   #19
sirius
Registered User
 
sirius's Avatar
 
sirius is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 942
What is the average price for a Pen-F body these days?
__________________
Leica fan
12 Best or Flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any Olympus RD opinions? dmr Rangefinder Photography Discussion 17 11-12-2005 02:34
How do you remove a welded battery cover from an Olympus Pen FT? Wayne R. Scott Rangefinder Photography Discussion 4 03-29-2005 20:30



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.