Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Range Finders > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

Main Menu
:
The Forums

the *best* Zorki
Old 10-05-2004   #1
Carburo
Rangefinding Architect
 
Carburo's Avatar
 
Carburo is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NW Italy
Age: 37
Posts: 85
the *best* Zorki

After the Kievs (my favourites) and FEDs, I am looking now for my first Zorki :P
Which one? I read good things about Zorki 6, and I like this:
http://www.dvdtechcameras.com/cameras/leica/67/67.htm
The price is a bit too high, but I'll think about this one, because they sell good and reliable items in my opinion.
I'm waiting for suggestions (see my other post too).

PS:
These Zorkies look amazing!
But isn't their price out of reasonable?

http://www.dvdtechcameras.com/cameras/leica/41/41.htm
http://www.dvdtechcameras.com/cameras/leica/42/42.htm
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=609'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #2
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,348
The Fed-Zorki's are primarily sought after by collectors. The prices are unreasonable for my wallet, but they might be worth it to someone out there. The collecting market will pretty much decide their reasonableness.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #3
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,348
If you are looking for a Zorki-6 to use, this one is a little high. That price is what you should expect to pay for one with Jupiter-8 INCLUDING all of the shipping charges from the Ukraine or Russia.

The Zorki-6 has a long base rangefinder. The best use for that rangefinder is the faster Jupiter-8 or Jupiter-9 telephoto. For the J-8 equipped camera the prices start as low as $25. It is not too hard to find a good one for around $35 plus shipping. The Jupiter-9 is not standard equipment, and you will typically have to find one by itself.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #4
mac_wt
Cameras are like bunnies
 
mac_wt's Avatar
 
mac_wt is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boom, Belgium
Age: 39
Posts: 367
I think the Zorki 3 or 3M is the 'best' Zorki. It has the classic style, but also a big and bright viewfinder. But since I'm not the only one with this opinion, they are a lot more expensive than the other zorki's.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #5
vladhed
R.I.P. 1997-2006
 
vladhed's Avatar
 
vladhed is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 314
I agree with mac_wt, however a Zorki 4 or 4K with Jupiter 8 represents the best value for money

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WDVW

but then I may be biased (I own a 1959 Zorki 4 with Jupiter 8 :-)
__________________
- Dominic Richens
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #6
Kin Lau
Registered User
 
Kin Lau is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,685
I have a Zorki 4 & a 4K both with J8's, and a 2C w/ I-22. The 2C is "stylish", looking much more like a Leica, but the 4K is a much more efficient shooter. My 4 is not very reliable.
__________________
Of course I have a photographic memory: over exposed, under developed, grainy and out of focus

<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=583'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #7
Laika
Member
 
Laika's Avatar
 
Laika is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 382
I don’t think you can beat the 3M for function or style but the prices for a nice one are high next to most Soviet cameras. The Zorki 6 is a nice user and the only one with a hinged back.

My favorite is the 'Red Logo' Zorki 5, its slightly smaller than the Z6, has the same larger finder that all the later Zorkis have. The main thing that puts people off is it’s a bottom loader and needs the film leader trimmed, not really an big issue IMO. Size wise its like a FED2 and makes the Zorki 3/4 models look a bit bloated.
__________________
FED's, Zorki's and a Bessa L
(And dare I say Nikon SLR's )
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2004   #8
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 46
Posts: 4,789
I've been doing a toss up of 4k vs 6 from Fedka. Is there really much of a difference other than the hinged back?

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 35/2.5 Color Skopar, 50/2 Summitar & 90/4 Elmar, Voigtlander Bessa I

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-06-2004   #9
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,348
They are very different cameras. The 4K has a shorter rangfinder baselength, but larger viewfinder and higher viewfinder magnification and most of them have no neckstrap lugs. The Zorki-6 has the aforementioned hinged back, longer rangefinder baselength, smaller viewfinder, harder to adjust eyepiece diopter, and all of them have neckstrap lugs.

Each is the end product of a divergence in KMZ design, the 4K being a descendant of the Zorki-3 line and the Z-6 being a descendant of the Zorki-S line.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-06-2004   #10
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 46
Posts: 4,789
So, IIUC, if I'm interested in telephoto lenses, I'd be better off with the longer baseline of the 6?

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 35/2.5 Color Skopar, 50/2 Summitar & 90/4 Elmar, Voigtlander Bessa I

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buying a Zorki 1 jamiewakeham FSU Former Soviet Union RF 11 05-02-2005 13:31
Zorki 4k + Zorki 6 = Zorki 46k? Max 2.8 FSU Former Soviet Union RF 3 02-16-2005 05:55
Kiev versus Zorki jcapodiferro FSU Former Soviet Union RF 10 01-08-2005 16:42
FED 3a vs. Zorki 4 viewfinders Gordon Coale FSU Former Soviet Union RF 4 11-26-2004 11:30



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.