Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Canon RF

Canon RF For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

135 does not focus at infinity
Old 12-29-2005   #1
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,715
135 does not focus at infinity

so my mint 135/3.5 canon lens does not focus all the way to infinity.

i took it out for a spin today and it was the first time to play outdoors with it.
when trying to focus at infinity i discovered the barrel would not turn all the way and the image would not completely coincide.

will this likely mean that it will front or back focus also?

and the big question...how do i fix it?

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-29-2005   #2
schmoozit
Schmoozit good...
 
schmoozit is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 211
My guess is that someone took the lens apart and put it back together improperly. Although, Dante Stella noted that this was a problem with some of these lenses, so maybe that's not it.

If it is focusing properly otherwise, which I guess you'd say if it weren't, then I'm not too sure. Is it simply stuck and needing a re-lube? Luckily, you've just practiced that!
__________________
Brent

There's always a chance.

Click here to see I don't know what I'm talkin' about.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-29-2005   #3
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,715
i have yet to develop any film from it. i did take some shots today and when i see the results i'll know better about it's focusing.
the lens does not look like it was worked on but who knows for sure?

no need for a re lube, it is smooth to turn.
the infinity mark lines up with the focusing mark perfectly.

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-29-2005   #4
schmoozit
Schmoozit good...
 
schmoozit is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 211
Well, the negs will hold the secrets. However, you can do a mirror test. The point of the test is to check the rangefinder, but it should tell you if you are getting a funky reading from the lens' scale, as long as you know the distance to the mirror.
__________________
Brent

There's always a chance.

Click here to see I don't know what I'm talkin' about.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-30-2005   #5
John Shriver
Registered User
 
John Shriver is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA, USA
Posts: 1,219
I presume that the focusing scale goes to infinity.

Set the lens at infinity. Measure how far the focusing tab projects "back" from the lens mount flat plane. It should be 7.5mm. You can measure it with some sort of micrometer, or just put one of your 50mm lenses (at infinity) back to back with the 135, and see that the cam sticks out the same on both lenses.

If it doesn't stick out 7.5mm when focused at infinity, some fool started the helical at the wrong start.

Another check is that the roller on the RF push rod is about 1/4" from the end of the sloped cam inside the lens when at infinity.

Oh, if you're saying the focusing scale doesn't go to infinity, see where that sloped cam is when your lens is focused as distant as it can go. If this is the case, I bet that the roller on the push-rod is banging up against the large vertical discontinuity in the cam.

Sorry, I have no idea how to take this lens apart. Mine is so clean and smooth there's been no reason to. I can only guess that you start with the two large screws that hold the push-rod, and them remove the three small set-screws.

Hmm, I does look like there's a slotted ring in the rear, on the outside of the rear element, that probably is what holds the lens block in the focusing mount.

Looks like the helical "only" has 12 starts. Eleven wrong ways to put it together, one right.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-30-2005   #6
peterc
Heretic
 
peterc's Avatar
 
peterc is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aurora, ON
Age: 58
Posts: 1,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmoozit
However, you can do a mirror test.
Cool test! All four of my RF cameras passed with flying colours.

Peter
__________________
____
Peter

"If you understand what photographic materials can do, you can learn to form a mental image of the finished photograph before you actually trip the shutter." -- David R. Young
My Gallery
My 10 faves + 2
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50mm Summicron and infinity lightwriter Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 13 12-27-2005 05:10
50/2,8 Elmar m-mount focus too easy? rich815 Leica M Film Cameras 9 10-06-2005 02:01
Does a wise man adjust his focus? Dan Lazin Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 11 07-24-2005 22:14
M6 infinity focus RF allignment needed? andyadler Leica M Film Cameras 6 05-31-2005 12:38
Arco Colinar f13.5cm/3.8 LTM BJ Bignell Rangefinder Photography Discussion 21 04-27-2005 20:07



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:35.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.