| Repair / Camera Care This is a good place to discuss the care and repair of your photo gear. You can share Do-It-Yourself repair and maintenance, as well as your recommendations for pro repairs. This new forum was created 4/1/07. PLEASE title your thread wisely, so others searching for a certain make of camera or repair person can find your thread easily! |
 |
CV25/4 adjustment of mount |
 |
12-07-2005
|
#1
|
|
Zoom with your feet!
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,863
|
CV25/4 adjustment of mount
Ever since I've had the CV25/4, I wasn't able to screw it in so that the focus mark lined up at the top. It always sat a little sideways. At first I thought it was the LTM-M adapter that caused it, but when I put it on another adapter the other day, the situation remained unchanged.
Yesterday I took the mount off and repositioned it, so that the focus mark is right where it should be. I took a couple of pictures of the process for those interested.
Picture 1: CV25/4 mounted, focus mark is to left of top position
Picture 2: Rear side of mount, there are four screws holding the mount
Picture 3: Removing the screw mount reveals a couple of shims
Picture 4: Removing the shims shows three possible positions for each of the four screws.
After this, the shims can be placed back, but positioned differently. There are four orientations that the screw mount itself can be attached now. I didn't think of this beforehand, so I had to try twice..
Picture 5: After placing the screw mount back, the lens can be screwed in so that the focus mark is at the top
It's definately easier to read the DOF scale like this
Last edited by pvdhaar : 12-08-2005 at 00:48.
|
|
|
|
 |
12-08-2005
|
#2
|
|
On the alert
Toby is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Wittering, West Sussex
Age: 42
Posts: 789
|
Well done Peter! You are much braver than I am
|
|
|
|
12-08-2005
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
ducttape is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 130
|
OMGosh, I always thught it was all the CV lens only I bought! Way to go guy! And thanks for sharing too.
__________________
www.DavidRose.us
Leica M9, M3, Voigtlander L, R, Epson R-D1 and yes, I did it. I went to the dark side. Now, a Nikon D200 too.
|
|
|
|
12-08-2005
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,103
|
This is very good information.
I would like to see it in the Repair Section, I'll bet a lot of lenses are made like this one.
|
|
|
|
12-08-2005
|
#5
|
|
Canadian & Not A Dentist
dcsang is online now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 4,418
|
Whoa..
Just an FYI - this also happens with the CV 15mm when mounted. It's just a tad to the left of center.
As a fiddler (one that tinkers, not one that plays on the roof  ) I'd be willing to take a look at this
Thanks for the tip
Dave
__________________
I own a Leica and I am NOT a dentist (I don't even portray one on TV!!!)
I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constatine Manos
ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill
My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
|
|
|
|
12-08-2005
|
#6
|
|
Milk and Strawberries
Nick R. is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 1,060
|
Good job, Peter. I see this question come up here and on other forums. Now people can point them to your post.
__________________
What time tomorrow you gonna tell me who's pitching?
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
 |
Deliberate |
 |
12-08-2005
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
FPjohn is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,578
|
Deliberate
Hello:
I used to be disturbed by the offset 'till I realized we are assumed to be viewing from the side; the eyepiece being on the far left. A very Leitz centric view. I still wonder about a Staeble-Telexon 135mm f3.8 which mounts with its well delineated and legible depth of field scale and focus mark facing the floor. What were they thinking?
yours
Frank
Last edited by FPjohn : 12-08-2005 at 11:52.
Reason: sp
|
|
|
|
12-08-2005
|
#8
|
|
Zoom with your feet!
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FPjohn
I used to be disturbed by the offset 'till I realized we are assumed to be viewing from the side; the eyepiece being on the far left. A very Leitz centric view.
|
Could be, but in this case the lens was oriented away from where the viewfinder is on any of the Bessa-R/R2/R2a/R3a/HexarRF/LeicaM/..
|
|
|
|
 |
so much... |
 |
12-09-2005
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
FPjohn is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,578
|
so much...
Hello:
So much for a logic to it! and my powers of observation.
yours
Frank
Last edited by FPjohn : 12-12-2005 at 04:45.
Reason: add comment
|
|
|
|
12-19-2005
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Theo-Prof is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 130
|
I noticed the same thing with my 15.4.5. It would not quite screw in tight enouth for the index mark to be straight up, and thus the possibility that the built in lens shade would show up in the corners. My fix was more simple. There is actually a fair amout of room around the screw heads on the mount. I just loosened the screws, turned the mount slightly and retightened the screws. I did the same with the mount on the camera body. The slight change in both mounts allowed the 15/4.5 to line-up properly.
Kevin
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1775'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
02-01-2007
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
oscroft is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Liverpool (UK) & Bangkok (Thailand)
Age: 54
Posts: 2,339
|
Quote:
|
I used to be disturbed by the offset 'till I realized we are assumed to be viewing from the side; the eyepiece being on the far left
|
No, I'm pretty sure it's not intended to be like that - the hood on the 15 isn't square if the focus indicator isn't vertical.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2007
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Bébèrt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 77
|
Dank je wel pvdhaar,
it realy works. I just adjusted my new heliar 15mm/4.5 and 4 screws later the lens was perfectly mounted on my R2M. Thanks for this usefull info.
you are an 
__________________
enjoy the light
|
|
|
|
02-06-2007
|
#13
|
|
The Peaceful Pacific
mike goldberg is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jerusalem [Bostonian]
Posts: 1,093
|
Hi... I just got the CV 25/4, and the little black dot is 1mm to the left of the groove of the CV adapter, as I look down from the top. Since this does not affect functionality in any way, I shall leave well enough alone. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." mike
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
wyk_penguin is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oscroft
No, I'm pretty sure it's not intended to be like that - the hood on the 15 isn't square if the focus indicator isn't vertical.
|
That would be a likely cause of uneven vignetting.  My Heliar is one of the stuborn type, no tinkering left it "exactly" straight. It was always a bit to the left or a bit to the right  and now I have to go return it and get another one. I Hate Voigtlander for this, but the Heliar is too good a lens to miss becuase of a misaligned mount. Why can't they get it right the first time? The Russians (and everyone else) make their mounting threads and then align them with the lens by drilling the appropriate holes. Why does Voigtlander drill 3 holes, none of which give the correct alignment (as with mine)?
__________________
My Gallery
Bessa R3A, M4, Seagull TLR, Bronica S2A, Canon 30D
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-20-2007
|
#15
|
|
Zoom with your feet!
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wyk_penguin
That would be a likely cause of uneven vignetting.  My Heliar is one of the stuborn type, no tinkering left it "exactly" straight. It was always a bit to the left or a bit to the right  and now I have to go return it and get another one. I Hate Voigtlander for this, but the Heliar is too good a lens to miss becuase of a misaligned mount. Why can't they get it right the first time? The Russians (and everyone else) make their mounting threads and then align them with the lens by drilling the appropriate holes. Why does Voigtlander drill 3 holes, none of which give the correct alignment (as with mine)?
|
The three screw positions can get rid of coarse problems like the one that prompted me to do this reseating of the mount on my CV25/4. But for the final mm of turn, the problem may not lie in the lens at all.
I've two CV adapters (28/90 and 35/135) and the same lens aligns differently in them. One a fraction to the left of vertical, the other dead center. You can even see that in the top picture #5, where the lens remains a bit skewed to the left..
|
|
|
|
 |
05-20-2007
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
winoto is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 78
|
i had the same problem with cv21 mounted without adapter on bessa L and with m adaptor onto bessa r2. however, when mounted on my leica IIIc, no alignment problems. since i use the cv21 more on my bessa L more than the leica, i did the adjustment as you have done, peter. thanks
|
|
|
|
05-21-2007
|
#17
|
|
Eugene Zaikonnikov
varjag is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bergen, Norway
Age: 36
Posts: 2,981
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wyk_penguin
The Russians (and everyone else) make their mounting threads and then align them with the lens by drilling the appropriate holes. Why does Voigtlander drill 3 holes, none of which give the correct alignment (as with mine)?
|
Because drilling apropirate holes involves relatively qualified human labor, while drilling the 3 holes can be easily automated and the approximate matching can be done by anyone.
|
|
|
|
05-21-2007
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
wyk_penguin is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 449
|
Oh well enough ranting on the qualities of mass produced products. Eventually I swapped it with one that fits without tinkering at the shop.
__________________
My Gallery
Bessa R3A, M4, Seagull TLR, Bronica S2A, Canon 30D
|
|
|
|
06-16-2011
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
chdiliproy is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
|
Hi, can anybody tell me where the pictures (1 through 4) are? I might have ruined my CV 35. I opened the base plate, and went beyond that. I also opened the little black screws holding the helicoid. After assembly, the whole focusing mechanism is a mess.
|
|
|
|
06-16-2011
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
jamesmck is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 42
|
Ummm.... Anyone know why I don't see any of Peter's pictures (with either Firefox or Chrome)?
__________________
James McKearney
Washington, DC
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:47. |
|
|