B&W dedicated printer
Old 12-03-2005   #1
lscaglio
Registered User
 
lscaglio is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 32
B&W dedicated printer

After many attempts with the r800 and reading various forum I decided to buy a dedicated B&W printer with appropriate inks (MIS or UT); two economic options are the c86 and the r220; anyones in the forum may help to choose a good printer/ink combination?
Thanks
Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #2
Nikon Bob
camera hunter & gatherer
 
Nikon Bob's Avatar
 
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
Do not overlook the HP 7960 which uses 8.5X11 paper. It will do very nice B&W with the supplied HP inks. You might find these reviews of various printers handy http://www.photo-i.co.uk/ .

Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #3
Honu-Hugger
Registered User
 
Honu-Hugger is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sun Valley, ID Corona del Mar, CA
Posts: 1,532
I can recommend the r2400 as well.
__________________
D2
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #4
ray_g
&gt;
 
ray_g's Avatar
 
ray_g is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT & NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikon Bob
Do not overlook the HP 7960 which uses 8.5X11 paper. It will do very nice B&W with the supplied HP inks. You might find these reviews of various printers handy http://www.photo-i.co.uk/ .

Bob
I agree. I have one of these and I like the results. Very inexpensive too. IIRC, Mike Johnston had a review of this printer in one of his SMP articles.
__________________
Ray


  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #5
kaiyen
local man of mystery
 
kaiyen's Avatar
 
kaiyen is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 34
Posts: 2,204
What's your budget?
__________________
My Photo Blog
flickr me
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #6
lido
Registered User
 
lido's Avatar
 
lido is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Just north of Toronto
Posts: 171
C86 with MIS inks is what I use and love. You can get a printer (refurbished) for about $19-20 on evil site and the set of MIS cartridges is $50 shipped.

The advantage of this set up compared to HP is lower initial cost as well as lower cost of ink. Plus you get archival quality pigment inks if you use archival matte papers.
__________________
Cheers,
Doug

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #7
richard_l
Registered User
 
richard_l's Avatar
 
richard_l is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,386
*****hp 7960*****
  Reply With Quote

Ditto
Old 12-03-2005   #8
brightsky
Registered User
 
brightsky's Avatar
 
brightsky is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 168
Ditto

Quote:
Originally Posted by lido
C86 with MIS inks is what I use and love. You can get a printer (refurbished) for about $19-20 on evil site and the set of MIS cartridges is $50 shipped.

The advantage of this set up compared to HP is lower initial cost as well as lower cost of ink. Plus you get archival quality pigment inks if you use archival matte papers.
This is a great combination, especially if you are on a budget.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #9
djon
Registered User
 
djon is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
Posts: 806
I've read that one of those small Epsons is slightly better with glossy and the other is slightly better with matte...but I can't remember which. The Yahoo B&W inkjet site discusses this today. They're both supposed to be superb either way, and neither is supposed to do better with MIS inksets...which are the best, according to Clayton Jones (ultimate expert).
__________________

The road to enlightenment is paved with excess.


John Kelly : Djon

<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1194'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #10
jano
Evil Bokeh
 
jano is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,207
me three on the hp 7960.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #11
richard_l
Registered User
 
richard_l's Avatar
 
richard_l is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by jano
me three on the hp 7960.
Actually me three you four.
__________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate elegance." Leonardo Da Vinci
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #12
Andrew Touchon
Registered User
 
Andrew Touchon's Avatar
 
Andrew Touchon is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 363
Me five on the 7960
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #13
djon
Registered User
 
djon is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
Posts: 806
Here's the main B&W inkjet forum...you're probably already one of the crew...they talk a lot about inksets, particularly MIS....the two small Epsons are compared, starting somewhere a little before this post...

Elsewhere, pay special attention to what Clayton Jones has to say..browse for him.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digita.../message/70781
__________________

The road to enlightenment is paved with excess.


John Kelly : Djon

<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1194'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #14
egpj
50 Summilux is da DEVIL!
 
egpj's Avatar
 
egpj is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bogota, Colombia
Age: 44
Posts: 731
If you can muster the cash get the R2400. Great B&W with no color shift.
__________________
Glenn

Photographers work I am interested in: Jon Kral; HCB the portraits
Equipment I am using: 2 MP's an MP3 and some lenses

Gallery

My Homepage
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #15
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 68
Posts: 3,225
Thanks for all the info on the 7960. I'd been looking at the Epson R2400 but disliking the fact that it costs more than my M2 did. The 7960 seems like a very good way to get started on the printing side. I have one on order.

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #16
T_om
Registered User
 
T_om's Avatar
 
T_om is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 701
You might want to read some of these reviews before ordering the HP.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #17
Nikon Bob
camera hunter & gatherer
 
Nikon Bob's Avatar
 
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_om
You might want to read some of these reviews before ordering the HP.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics

Tom
I think 5 forum members finding the HP 7960 works well for them pretty telling. I sometimes get the feeling that unless a printer is Epson, a scanner is Nikon and a camera is Leica it is not taken seriously. Anyway there are lots of choices and reviews out there on the net.

Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #18
richard_l
Registered User
 
richard_l's Avatar
 
richard_l is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,386
The HP 7960 is not exactly cheap to operate. However, the machine always works for me, and it works extremely well. I think the peace of mind and ease of use is worth the expense.
__________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate elegance." Leonardo Da Vinci
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #19
ray_g
&gt;
 
ray_g's Avatar
 
ray_g is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT & NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,755
I use mine almost exclusively for black and white. What I find most appealing is that it will print black blacks and beautiful gradations of gray with the HP cartridges, without the need for custom inks and tweaking programs. I don't know much about those things and I really don't want to spend the time to learn it.

The way I see it, if I have a "special" image, I just have the guy at my custom lab do it. For the rest, the HP is more than good enough. Never had a problem with mine.

If it is just for B/W, a more economical alternative is the 7660. I had one and "upgraded" because of some controversy regarding its producing inferior results compared to the more expensive 7960. I didn't see any difference.
__________________
Ray


  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #20
kaiyen
local man of mystery
 
kaiyen's Avatar
 
kaiyen is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 34
Posts: 2,204
Well, to be fair, the C86 option with the MIS inkset (the EZ B&W) is extremely simple to get going, and does not require any special software. Actually, even if you decide to go hardcore with it with curves and whatnot, you still don't need any special software.

I still prefer a full 4-6 tone inkset rather, which is why I'm using the ultratone2 set from MIS in my Epson 1280.

allan
__________________
My Photo Blog
flickr me
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2005   #21
T_om
Registered User
 
T_om's Avatar
 
T_om is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikon Bob
I think 5 forum members finding the HP 7960 works well for them pretty telling. I sometimes get the feeling that unless a printer is Epson, a scanner is Nikon and a camera is Leica it is not taken seriously. Anyway there are lots of choices and reviews out there on the net.

Bob
Um... Epson, Nikon and Leica, eh?

I only own one of those brands (Nikon scanner). I have zero interest in Leica cameras and would not have another Epson printer if you gave me one.

You may find the 5 examples in this thread are giving perfectly sound advice. How many of them have had a problem though? How many of them have used HP's repair/warranty/customer service?

When any half-decently designed device is running smoothly their owners are not the ones you will find with complaints. Go talk to those that have had a problem... ANY electro-mechanical device is subject to failure. It is how those failures are addressed that makes for satisfied or unsatisfied customers.

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2005   #22
richard_l
Registered User
 
richard_l's Avatar
 
richard_l is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_om
When any half-decently designed device is running smoothly their owners are not the ones you will find with complaints. Go talk to those that have had a problem... ANY electro-mechanical device is subject to failure. It is how those failures are addressed that makes for satisfied or unsatisfied customers.
Am I understanding you correctly that good customer service is more important than a dependable product?

Anyhow..... I had a software problem with the HP 7960. I emailed customer service and within 6 hours got a detailed response on how to troubleshoot it and fix it. It turned out to be an incompatibility with my version (the first version) of Windows 98, which was easily fixed.

Perhaps others have had less pleasant experiences with HP's customer service.
__________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate elegance." Leonardo Da Vinci
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2005   #23
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 68
Posts: 3,225
A heads-up for Canadian buyers -- the HP 7960 at Best Buy is the same list price as Amazon.com, but in Cdn $$, making it about 20% cheaper.

http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/prodde...gon=&langid=EN

Free shipping as well.

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2005   #24
Nikon Bob
camera hunter & gatherer
 
Nikon Bob's Avatar
 
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
Tom

I see you woke up. I could not agree more with you that electo-mechanical devices can fail and customer service is very important in that case. I have had mine for 1 year now with no trouble (touch wood) and if it does go south on me I think for what they cost now they are disposable. OTH if I had trouble I would be sure to mention it. Again none of the 5 members has had trouble so that in itself maybe a good sign. On another tack, it is harder to find good customer service and support these days no matter the brand. If you do print at home and would not have another Epson printer, what do you use?

Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2005   #25
ray_g
&gt;
 
ray_g's Avatar
 
ray_g is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT & NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,755
Sounds like a bargain, Gene.

Anyway, a little side question if no one minds: I have never used paper other than HP's. What is everyone's favorite paper? Any need to modify the printer/driver settings as only HP paper options are listed on the pull down menu (aside from the choice that only says: "Other brand?"
__________________
Ray


  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LEICA MP, a new tool for professional and dedicated amateur photographers MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 24 05-08-2008 13:54
Flat bed vs dedicated film scanner ywenz Rangefinder Photography Discussion 11 10-04-2005 12:03
Inkjet printer advice Dave G Digital Printers / Inks / Papers etc 19 10-03-2005 17:07
New Printer MP Guy Digital Printers / Inks / Papers etc 4 10-26-2004 17:56



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.