Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Quick question for LTM to M adapter users..
Old 12-02-2005   #1
f/stopblues
photo loner
 
f/stopblues's Avatar
 
f/stopblues is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 628
Quick question for LTM to M adapter users..

Do you guys have a separate adapter for each lens, or do you leave the adapter in the body and unscrew the lens?

Curious minds want to know! Is there a good reason to do one or the other?
__________________
-Chris

"Emotion or feeling is really the only thing about pictures I find interesting. Beyond that it is just a trick."
- Christopher Anderson, Magnum Photog
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #2
bmicklea
RF Newbie
 
bmicklea's Avatar
 
bmicklea is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 177
Chris,

I started with the "clever" idea of using one adapter and just screwing the lenses I had in and out all the time. Strangely one of my main reasons for buying an R2A over an R was that the former had the M-bayonet system... So basically I turned by R2A into a fancy screw-mount camera. I suffered with that for a few weeks and then finally went the 1 adapter per lens way. I've never looked back - it's so much nicer. Well worth the cash outlay (well, unless you have 10 lenses maybe).

Brad
__________________
-Brad


My RFF Gallery

Newest Shots

  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #3
FPjohn
Registered User
 
FPjohn's Avatar
 
FPjohn is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,585
one per lens
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #4
rich815
Always carry a camera
 
rich815's Avatar
 
rich815 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,564
One per lens for me too. You can get them used for $30-35 or so and it's much easier IMO.
__________________
----------------------------------------

"Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

Light, Shadow, and Tone
http://www.lightshadowandtone.com/

My Commute Photo Blog

http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/

My Flickr River
http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #5
Nikon Bob
camera hunter & gatherer
 
Nikon Bob's Avatar
 
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,830
That depends. If I am using my M body and want the 21CV along I will mount the adaptor to the lens for convenience. If I wanted to use several screw mount lens with an M, I would get an adaptor for each for convenience sake. If it was only screw mounts on an M, I would just have the one adaptor on the body.

Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #6
laptoprob
back to basics
 
laptoprob's Avatar
 
laptoprob is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the original Haarlem
Age: 46
Posts: 1,559
As stated above, having the faster lens-changing comfort of a bayonet is one of the main reasons for using multiple adapters.
Besides, Hexar CLE and Leica's change the framelines in the viewfinder automatically because of the specific mount.

Makes sense.

cheers, Rob.
__________________
groeten, Rob.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams







IR and concert pics
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #7
o0dano0o
the best times are random
 
o0dano0o's Avatar
 
o0dano0o is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 89
one per lens - it keeps the time it takes to change lenses low. Plus on leicas, the framelines that show are dictated by the lens, in this case the adaptor, so you need at least one per lens width (unless you want to fiddle with the preview lever...)
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #8
o0dano0o
the best times are random
 
o0dano0o's Avatar
 
o0dano0o is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by laptoprob
As stated above, having the faster lens-changing comfort of a bayonet is one of the main reasons for using multiple adapters.
Besides, Hexar CLE and Leica's change the framelines in the viewfinder automatically because of the specific mount.

Makes sense.

cheers, Rob.
um exactly - im a sloww typer sometimes...... : )
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #9
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
One per lens, also. Right now I have one on a Canon 50mm F1.5 and one on a Nikkor 10.5cm F2.5. have not decided what lens to use with the spare 50 adapter.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #10
laptoprob
back to basics
 
laptoprob's Avatar
 
laptoprob is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the original Haarlem
Age: 46
Posts: 1,559
Obvious, another 50? One of the J3's? I can reccommend an old uncoated Elmar!
Lots of choices!

Rob
__________________
groeten, Rob.

You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams







IR and concert pics
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2005   #11
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
One per lens
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #12
peter_n
~
 
peter_n's Avatar
 
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,130
Another to add to the tidal wave - one per lens. Can get expensive if you buy a lot of FSU gear, those lenses are cheaper than the adapters!

__________________
_
~Peter

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #13
ray_g
&gt;
 
ray_g's Avatar
 
ray_g is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT & NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,755
Good news is, you tend to accumulate them as part of the deal when you buy used CV lenses
__________________
Ray


  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #14
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,157
I'm working on getting to the one per lens goal, but am still a few adaptors short of that.
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #15
johne
Registered User
 
johne is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paducah, KY
Age: 84
Posts: 422
The adaptors I use can handle two different screw mount lens; e.g., 35 and 135 or 50 and 90.
Johne
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1325'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2005   #16
zpuskas
Registered User
 
zpuskas's Avatar
 
zpuskas is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 208
I try to go with one adapter to one lens too, but since my adapters can be used with two focal lengths--keep it simple and cost effective.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LTM -> M adapter question BrianPhotog Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 7 02-14-2006 21:04
Quick Chemical Question dcsang Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film 25 07-28-2005 19:19
Any Nikon F users, question. Todd.Hanz Off Topic 20 09-21-2004 02:27
R2 Adapter Question hjfischer Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 3 08-30-2004 11:43



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.