 |
Quick question for LTM to M adapter users.. |
 |
12-02-2005
|
#1
|
|
photo loner
f/stopblues is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 628
|
Quick question for LTM to M adapter users..
Do you guys have a separate adapter for each lens, or do you leave the adapter in the body and unscrew the lens?
Curious minds want to know! Is there a good reason to do one or the other?
__________________
-Chris
"Emotion or feeling is really the only thing about pictures I find interesting. Beyond that it is just a trick."
- Christopher Anderson, Magnum Photog
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#2
|
|
RF Newbie
bmicklea is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 177
|
Chris,
I started with the "clever" idea of using one adapter and just screwing the lenses I had in and out all the time. Strangely one of my main reasons for buying an R2A over an R was that the former had the M-bayonet system... So basically I turned by R2A into a fancy screw-mount camera. I suffered with that for a few weeks and then finally went the 1 adapter per lens way. I've never looked back - it's so much nicer. Well worth the cash outlay (well, unless you have 10 lenses maybe).
Brad
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
FPjohn is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,585
|
one per lens
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#4
|
|
Always carry a camera
rich815 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,564
|
One per lens for me too. You can get them used for $30-35 or so and it's much easier IMO.
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#5
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,830
|
That depends. If I am using my M body and want the 21CV along I will mount the adaptor to the lens for convenience. If I wanted to use several screw mount lens with an M, I would get an adaptor for each for convenience sake. If it was only screw mounts on an M, I would just have the one adaptor on the body.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#6
|
|
back to basics
laptoprob is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the original Haarlem
Age: 46
Posts: 1,559
|
As stated above, having the faster lens-changing comfort of a bayonet is one of the main reasons for using multiple adapters.
Besides, Hexar CLE and Leica's change the framelines in the viewfinder automatically because of the specific mount.
Makes sense.
cheers, Rob.
__________________
groeten, Rob.
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams
IR and concert pics
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#7
|
|
the best times are random
o0dano0o is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 89
|
one per lens - it keeps the time it takes to change lenses low. Plus on leicas, the framelines that show are dictated by the lens, in this case the adaptor, so you need at least one per lens width (unless you want to fiddle with the preview lever...)
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#8
|
|
the best times are random
o0dano0o is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by laptoprob
As stated above, having the faster lens-changing comfort of a bayonet is one of the main reasons for using multiple adapters.
Besides, Hexar CLE and Leica's change the framelines in the viewfinder automatically because of the specific mount.
Makes sense.
cheers, Rob.
|
um exactly - im a sloww typer sometimes...... : )
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
|
One per lens, also. Right now I have one on a Canon 50mm F1.5 and one on a Nikkor 10.5cm F2.5. have not decided what lens to use with the spare 50 adapter.
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#10
|
|
back to basics
laptoprob is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the original Haarlem
Age: 46
Posts: 1,559
|
Obvious, another 50? One of the J3's? I can reccommend an old uncoated Elmar!
Lots of choices!
Rob
__________________
groeten, Rob.
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams
IR and concert pics
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005
|
#11
|
|
Trying to get it right
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
|
One per lens
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005
|
#12
|
|
~
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,130
|
Another to add to the tidal wave - one per lens. Can get expensive if you buy a lot of FSU gear, those lenses are cheaper than the adapters!
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005
|
#13
|
|
>
ray_g is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT & NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,755
|
Good news is, you tend to accumulate them as part of the deal when you buy used CV lenses 
__________________
Ray
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,157
|
I'm working on getting to the one per lens goal, but am still a few adaptors short of that.
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
johne is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paducah, KY
Age: 84
Posts: 422
|
The adaptors I use can handle two different screw mount lens; e.g., 35 and 135 or 50 and 90.
Johne
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1325'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
zpuskas is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 208
|
I try to go with one adapter to one lens too, but since my adapters can be used with two focal lengths--keep it simple and cost effective.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25. |
|
|