Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Tri-X 320 vs 400 in 120
Old 10-09-2003   #1
Rich Silfver
Batteries Not Included
 
Rich Silfver is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,709
Tri-X 320 vs 400 in 120

I just recently 'abandoned' T-Max 100 for Tri-X 320 in 120 format film as I was very, very impressed with the film - although I felt it had a tendency to blow out some of the highlights.

Now I stumbled upon the Tri-400 - also in 120.

Does anyone have any experience in using both films and what their strengths and weakness may be compared to eachother?

I'm planning to take a few test rolls of the 400 but was looking for heads-up on how it behaves.

Tri-X 320 Example:
__________________
My favorite RF cameras right now:
Leica III (F), Leica M3 and Contax IIIa



.........................
Blog.........................Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2003   #2
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,656
on a completely different tangent, i recommend trying the delta films from ilford. they come in 100/400/3200 iso.
i much prefer them over kodak products.
of course i'm biased, i don't care for kodak the company much at all.

joe
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Re: Tri-X 320 vs 400 in 120
Old 10-10-2003   #3
znapschatz
Registered User
 
znapschatz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 52
Re: Tri-X 320 vs 400 in 120

Quote:
Originally posted by rsilfverberg
I just recently 'abandoned' T-Max 100 for Tri-X 320 in 120 format film as I was very, very impressed with the film - although I felt it had a tendency to blow out some of the highlights.

Now I stumbled upon the Tri-400 - also in 120.

Does anyone have any experience in using both films and what their strengths and weakness may be compared to eachother?

I'm planning to take a few test rolls of the 400 but was looking for heads-up on how it behaves.

Tri-X 320 Example:
Swell pic, rs, and a fine example of what Tri-X Pan Professional (TXP) can do. The film was designed for studio/controlled lighting use. It's good with on camera flash, too. TXP tonality, under those conditions, looks a lot like Tmax 400 (TMY) to me, but like TMY, it is not as flexible for general photography. Both tend to be affected more by flare than Tri-X 400 (TX) and highlight densities build up rather steep, causing the highlight blowout which you have observed. TX is more resistant to both and is therefore better suited to uncontrolled lighting conditions.
TX was my main film in both 120 and 35 mm for 30+ years. These days I use HP5+ for no better reason than it comes in 220 rolls. It is sort of in between TX and TMY in its overall look with more of a straight line characteristic curve like TMY but with a TX-y shoulder. Delta 400 is also good, with finer grain. Just between us, if the price is right I will use almost any film. Almost all can be made to work well.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kodak 400 UC at Walmart rover Rangefinder Photography Discussion 18 10-10-2004 09:55
Neopan 400 GeneW Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film 7 08-26-2004 14:51



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:52.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.