 |
New Pentax Ricoh "Q" Body. Q10 |
 |
09-10-2012
|
#1
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
New Pentax Ricoh "Q" Body. Q10
Just announced from Pentax/Ricoh. I wish they had black again, just silver and red.
Faster processing, compatibility with K-mount lenses and a slightly improved sensor. I know I'm about the only one around here who is interested in these but I thought I'd post the news anyway
What is kind of fun, and what I will snag, is the new telephoto zoom (80-250mm equiv).
Love the fact there are so many choices of equipment right now...whatever floats your boat!
|
|
|
|
09-10-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
vrgard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Silicon Valley, California
Posts: 1,795
|
Hey Kent, the postings I've seen do show a black model in addition to the red and silver models. And I agree that the new longer zoom looks like great fun with that little camera. Nice to see Pentax continuing to support the Q platform. And the price point is even down a bit from the original Q although it is still somewhat pricey. But what a little jewel it is...
-Randy
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#3
|
|
Hexaneur
kanzlr is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vienna (Austria)
Age: 32
Posts: 803
|
you're not. On a German forum I saw a sample pics thread with images made with the original Q. Quite impressive.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,739
|
The original Q is getting quite cheap these days.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#5
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit
The original Q is getting quite cheap these days.
|
Yeah, it's a pretty good deal at this point. The little prime is an awesome 47mm equivalent lens.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#6
|
|
Unused film collector
Paddy C is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Too far north for my liking
Posts: 723
|
When I finally got to handle a Q last year I was really impressed. Not the camera system for me, but the build and finish and overall "I like this factor" was outstanding.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 803
|
does this thing have an optional evf? i could see where it could be a very interesting complementary tool, but personally i need a vf for extrme telephoto or macro...
tony
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#9
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
Great thread, thanks for posting. I really like my Q, primarily for street work. Plus...it's just cool and fun to use.
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
|
Dont forget to check out the zoo photos on page 2 or 3 of that link.
Is there any compelling reason to buy a q10 over the original model?
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#11
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
I'd like to play with one. They state it has a slightly revised sensor and that operational speed is much faster. I think the only thing I would like to see is a little better, as in faster, jpg+RAW writing time. That said, it's a minor thing and the current version is by no means a dog in that respect.
In terms of the sensor I imagine the high ISO might be a bit improved, every generation makes a step forward. How big a step, who knows. This isn't the camera for pitch black shooting anyway.
There also are more customization options available for the front dial though I'm hoping that will come to the first version via firmware.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
|
Thanks. Here's hoping. Looks like a fun little camera.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 419
|
They are as cute as a button but are they selling any? When first introduced last year I took a look at prices and was taken aback. Especially the optical VF for the standard lens. The $250 price (now a still breath taking $200) looks for all the world like egregious price gouging. That plastic bodied finder should go for no more than $100!
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#14
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
The original price screwed the sales here the US I think. From what I understand they did fine in Japan.
The viewfinder is nutty expensive for this type of camera, so true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuiko85
They are as cute as a button but are they selling any? When first introduced last year I took a look at prices and was taken aback. Especially the optical VF for the standard lens. The $250 price (now a still breath taking $200) looks for all the world like egregious price gouging. That plastic bodied finder should go for no more than $100!
|
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
benlees is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 41
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit
The original Q is getting quite cheap these days.
|
This is a step in the right direction. Pentax appeals to me in a slightly irrational way and the price of the Q nearly cured me of it! Luckily, my Fuji love is bigger. I wouldn't mind having a kick about Q but it would have to be cheap!
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012
|
#16
|
|
Skeptic
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 2,867
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdemas
|
Hold on, not so fast Kent. Not only do they come in black, but it looks like brown, orange, and ivory might be out there for you!  Check this out:
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/09/09/...geable-lenses/
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.
|
|
|
|
09-12-2012
|
#17
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,151
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Pillers
|
Ahhhh, all is well
I love their little commentary at the bottom bashing it for being for people "who don't care about IQ". Any review where people have obviously never used the item drives me up the wall. Bleh.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05. |
|
|