Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras -

CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras - This new category of digital Compact System Cameras with interchangeable lenses was mislabeled for a time as "Mirrorless Cameras" by those forgetting about "Mirrorless" Rangefinder cameras.  Such confusion is easily understandable, since interchangeable rangefinder cameras were only recently introduced in 1932.  hmm.    CSC or Compact System Camera is probably the best category description to date, although I am fond of the old RFF desigation of  CEVIL  indicating Compact Electronic Viewfidner Interchangeable Lens.   This forum is here at RFF because via adapters these cameras offer an inexpensive way to use rangefinder lenses on digital cameras -- in addition of just about every 35mm SLR lens you can think of.  All  offer the photo enthusiast an incredible array of adopted lenses which was not possible before these new digital formats.   This group continues to grow in popularity and new camera models! 

View Poll Results: Are in camera art filters a selling point in a digital camera?
What is this dee gee tall you speak of? 5 8.06%
No. I can create any effect I want in post processing. 25 40.32%
I don't care. It isn't like I *have* to use them. 21 33.87%
Yes. They're fun and I enjoy using them. 11 17.74%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

In camera art filters
Old 09-06-2012   #1
defconfunk
n00b
 
defconfunk's Avatar
 
defconfunk is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 237
In camera art filters

I just noticed an ad on Dpreview for the new G5. It was advertising '14 creative filters' including cross-process.

Art filters are nothing new in digital cameras. They've been a staple in P&S for years, and they are pretty common on entry level DSLRs. And then of course there is instagram et al on the cell phones.

Personally, I've never found a want for them on cameras (but I do use one on my phone).

So, here's my question to the RFF faithful: are built in art filters a selling point to you in a new camera?
__________________
I have a camera. I enjoy pushing the big button.
http://mattkrull.tumblr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2012   #2
Mystyler
Registered User
 
Mystyler's Avatar
 
Mystyler is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: W.A.
Posts: 187
I've got them on my E-5.
Sometimes I use them, most of the time I don't but they're fun. Better to have them and not need them, then need them and not have them. Life is too short to PP.
__________________
Olympus OM-1N MD; E-5; ФЭД-2; Canon AF35M; Bronica EC
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2012   #3
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystyler View Post
I've got them on my E-5.
Sometimes I use them, most of the time I don't but they're fun. Better to have them and not need them, then need them and not have them. Life is too short to PP.
Need?

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2012   #4
D.J.
-
 
D.J. is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 40
I don't use them much but they are fun, for friends and family members.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-23-2012   #5
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,216
For a while, I tried running my M9 set for B&W preview,jpeg ( DNG is still full RGB ) as suggested by Thorsten Overgaard in his blog, but decided it made things more complicated rather than easier.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2012   #6
rluka
Registered User
 
rluka is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 177
It never has been a selling point

But for the rare occassions when the filter can easily give that special effect you wanted… why not ?
Keep the post processing special effect for when you really need the high accuracy to your imagination and use the gimmick when it suffices the need.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-08-2012   #7
biomed
Registered User
 
biomed's Avatar
 
biomed is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle Area (North)
Posts: 2,892
I have never purchased a camera because of built in art filters. I do own a couple of cameras that have this feature, but the filters do not work with raw images. I don't have an issue with the use of built in filters. If you like them, then by all means use them! My LX5 has a large number of selectable presets.

Mike
__________________
biomed
Things are more like they are now than they’ve ever been before.

2014 Photos

rff Gallery

Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-09-2012   #8
sepiareverb
-
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,139
Seems like a good intermediate step between real photography and Instagram or Hipstamatic. Hopefully this will entice some of those poor souls who use their phones to become better consumers.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-02-2013   #9
Harry Caul
Registered User
 
Harry Caul is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 175
I didn't purchase my OM-D because of the art-filters. But the stellar metering and in-camera jpeg processing (art filters included) definitely factored into my purchase. I shoot RAW+JPEG and my camera is usually set to aperture priority and monochrome. That gives me B&W on the screen/EVF as I'm used to composing that way with film... but I always have access to color with the RAWs as well. I don't use the art filters often, but when I do it is usually the grainy B&W mode (the less intense version). I rarely print and almost never print large so I only feel the need to process from RAWs on maybe 5-10% of my pictures.

I like taking photos and I sit behind a desk far too much for my day job.
__________________
Plaubel 670, Rolleiflex 2.8E2 Planar, Polaroid 195, Leica M3, Contax G2, Olympus OM-D
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-10-2013   #10
Buzz40
Recovering Leicaholic
 
Buzz40's Avatar
 
Buzz40 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 107
Not a selling point for me. I have the Fuji X Pro which has several film simulation settings for color and b&w. Especially for the b&w, I've found the filter settings helpful if I'm out for the day just carrying one body + one lens with all the rest of the kit left at home. Also, I find the Vivid color setting a good match when I'm shooting with some older Nikkor MF lenses. So, I've found good uses for them, but they would never be a major deciding factor for me.
__________________
Cheers!
Buzz
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-10-2013   #11
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,289
Most of my cameras work in aperture and occasionally program mode shooting bog standard RAW files. I then decide what effects if any I want in post processing. Although I have once or twice tried in camera effects for the heck of it these photos almost always get erased as they are over done - I can usually do much better than any camera at "prettying up" my images.
__________________
Peter M

Flickr me: http://www.flickr.com/photos/80702381@N00/[SIGPIC]

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston S Churchill
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.