Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-29-2012   #26
macjim
Registered User
 
macjim's Avatar
 
macjim is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 238
I'd love to see it with the buttons of the x-pro1, Q button etc, losing the bad set-up it has just now, the same sensor and no anti-alias filter as in the x-pro1 too! Oh, and make it in black as a standard choice rather than the current limited edition then I might trade in my M9 and 35mm Leica lens.
__________________
Cheers, Macjim
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-29-2012   #27
steveniphoto
Registered User
 
steveniphoto is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 244
do people in the comments really expect fuji to release something with a full frame sensor for anywhere near the price that the x100 retailed at? my x100 had EXCELLENT iso performance up at 6400 and performed way past my expectations.

anyways i would love to see faster AF, better battery life, and shorter shutter lag if at all possible. otherwise i loved my x100 the way it was.
__________________
blog
夢のある場所
collab blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #28
shadesofgris
Registered User
 
shadesofgris is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Francisco, Hong Kong and China
Posts: 14
Here's my guesses.

* 23mm (35mm EQ) FL, maybe f/1.8. (needs to be compatible with the just released wide angle adapter)
* X-Trans sensor.
* X-Pro 1 form factor. (locking speed dial, Q-button, directional keys instead of a wheel, maybe black/silver options)
* X-Pro 1 menus.
* Faster autofocus.

What I'd like to see that I think is realistic
* Manual focus ring that doesn't spin forever and has a focus scale (photos of the upcoming 14mm 2.8 have been shown to have a focus scale)
* 50mm EQ FL normal lens adapter
* In camera stabilization. (although I felt I never needed it on the X100)
* Better solution for a lens hood or add on filters.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #29
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 813
yes, outside of improvement in DOF, i'm not sure what advantage one gains from making a fixed lens camera FF vs apsc. and i wonder if even that advantage can be approximated by opening up the apsc lens aperture to lets say 1.4...

if they opened up the aperture another stop and eliminated shutter lag, thatd be enough improvement for me.
tony
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #30
River Dog
Always looking
 
River Dog's Avatar
 
River Dog is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 630
Quote:
I'll take your word for it. But that built in flash is one of a number of factors that prevented me from buying the camera.
The onboard flash is very, very good, so why is that one reason for not buying one?

__________________
If I can find it, buy it and lift it, I'll shoot it

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #31
Teuthida
-
 
Teuthida is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 647
Just give me a place on the camera back where I can put my thumb without pushing some damn button or moving some dial.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #32
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 16,120
i can't figure out how to use the flash on my x100. i'd sure like to know so i can experiment ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #33
River Dog
Always looking
 
River Dog's Avatar
 
River Dog is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teuthida View Post
Just give me a place on the camera back where I can put my thumb without pushing some damn button or moving some dial.
You can lock the command wheel functions by pushing on "OK" for a few seconds.
__________________
If I can find it, buy it and lift it, I'll shoot it

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #34
River Dog
Always looking
 
River Dog's Avatar
 
River Dog is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulfish4570 View Post
i can't figure out how to use the flash on my x100. i'd sure like to know so i can experiment ...
Right-click on the command wheel for "Force Flash" and it will take care of itself.

On-board flash in very bright conditions.
__________________
If I can find it, buy it and lift it, I'll shoot it

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #35
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
I probably won't upgrade unless they figure out how to put a fist class AF system in these cameras.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #36
texchappy
Registered User
 
texchappy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
And I hear Olympus are planning a new OM micro four thirds that will be called the OM-Double D (OM-DD) with slightly larger dimensions.

They felt the need to keep abreast with the competition.
Latest rumor is that it's going to be a digital TLR with fixed 500mm/1.4 lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #37
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito View Post
I'll take your word for it. But that built in flash is one of a number of factors that prevented me from buying the camera. I went with NEX. An X200 would be of interest so long as they keep the 35mm focal length, and the EVF was as good or better than the NEX....
No need to take anyone's word for it- the thing even works on mirror self-portraits:


Mirror Self-Portrait with Fill Flash, February 12, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

And there's a perfectly good hot shoe on it, too.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #38
River Dog
Always looking
 
River Dog's Avatar
 
River Dog is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 630
Quote:
And there's a perfectly good hot shoe on it, too.
And the cheap EF-20 flash is a very good buy, to save on camera batteries and kick up the output.

__________________
If I can find it, buy it and lift it, I'll shoot it

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #39
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito View Post
I'll take your word for it. But that built in flash is one of a number of factors that prevented me from buying the camera. I went with NEX. An X200 would be of interest so long as they keep the 35mm focal length, and the EVF was as good or better than the NEX....
Look, you don't have to use it but the X-100 flash is FANTASTIC for daylight fill because the X100 has such a high sync speed. Fuji would be total fools to ditch that KILLER FEATURE not found in any other camera with a similar form factor.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #40
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,027
I am quite content with my X100. There would have to be a major change befor I would even think about upgrading.
__________________
"Perspective is governed by where you stand – object size and the angle of view included in the picture is determined by focal length." H.S. Newcombe

Self-Induced Transparency Photography, FLICKR, Professional Portfolio.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #41
Audii-Dudii
Registered User
 
Audii-Dudii is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
I am quite content with my X100. There would have to be a major change befor I would even think about upgrading.
Likewise, but if Fuji does nothing but swap-in the X-Pro1's sensor, then I'll buy the new model in a heartbeat! As much as I like the X100's output and as confident as I am that we're not yet seeing the best the X-Pro1 sensor has to offer, the difference in image quality between the two as things now stand is, for me, simply too large to ignore.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #42
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog View Post
Look, you don't have to use it but the X-100 flash is FANTASTIC for daylight fill because the X100 has such a high sync speed. Fuji would be total fools to ditch that KILLER FEATURE not found in any other camera with a similar form factor.
Regardless, would still prefer no flash. Simplicity and all that. I don't like fill flash, but I understand what it can do and that I'm likely in the minority.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-30-2012   #43
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito View Post
Regardless, would still prefer no flash. Simplicity and all that. I don't like fill flash, but I understand what it can do and that I'm likely in the minority.
So, do as I do, and disable it when appropriate. I don't understand the objection. It's there if you want it and if you don't it's simple to disable it.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-31-2012   #44
macjim
Registered User
 
macjim's Avatar
 
macjim is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 238
Well, it looks like its been a rumour as Fuji has denied the discontinued story going by this: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...is-dead-rumour
__________________
Cheers, Macjim
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-31-2012   #45
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
It's still a good camera that is probably selling relatively well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-31-2012   #46
dogbunny
Registered Boozer
 
dogbunny's Avatar
 
dogbunny is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Көкшетау, Қазақстан
Posts: 507
from the article
Quote:
However, when approached by Amateur Photographer, a spokesman for Fujifilm UK said: ‘The camera is still in production and is not discontinued as far as the UK is concerned.'
Doesn't that statement seem loaded?
__________________
Deserve your dream -- Octavio Paz
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-31-2012   #47
kai.zorki
Registered User
 
kai.zorki is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bonn - germany
Age: 23
Posts: 60
I would like to see a tele adapter for 50m m fov!
So a used x100 would be a nice "2 lens kit" despite the fairly small difference between 35 and 50.

This might be the x200:http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2012/0...00-is-now-999/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-31-2012   #48
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,405
The funny thing is that I bought my x100 for $1080 brand new at my local central city camera dealer in October last year. A price drop to $999 is like pocket change.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:00.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.