If Not the Plustek 120 then what?
Old 07-21-2012   #1
print44
Registered User
 
print44 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 771
If Not the Plustek 120 then what?

Now that the real world has intervened on my desire to own the new Plustek 120 scanner - I can't afford one - rather than putting away my MF cameras I need to buy a suitable and affordable scanner.

I've a Rolleiflex and a 'cord and a Moscow 5. My pictures don't have to be blown up bigger than A2 and are 99% B/W.

The V700 is the obvious choice, but are there other options? Let's set the £350 of a new V700 as the price ceiling...

Cheers,
__________________
James
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #2
Sejanus.Aelianus
Registered User
 
Sejanus.Aelianus's Avatar
 
Sejanus.Aelianus is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 628
If you already have a decent dSLR, you could do what I do and use a light table plus a macro lens. I use the Jessop light table, which cost me £15 new a few years back. If I didn't already have the lens, I'd just buy a good enlarging lens (you can get high end lenses for a few pounds these days) some cheap extension tubes and a couple of adaptors. Even if you have to buy it all, £75 should see you well clear. For convenience, buy a solid enlarger with a detachable head and use it as a copy stand. When I say "buy" you'll find that people are giving them away these days.

With that lot, you're limited only by how big you'd print from your dSLR.
__________________
Sometimes out of focus but never out of bounds...

pIXIS
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #3
ColSebastianMoran
Registered User
 
ColSebastianMoran's Avatar
 
ColSebastianMoran is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 890
You want to print A2 which is 16.5" x 23.5" (approx).

I use a V500 for scans of MF film. I think I get good sharp prints up to 6x the linear dimension of the film, and I like a print that still looks sharp held up close. That's 12x18" from 6x9cm film, or 12x12" from 6x6cm film. So, you want to print somewhat bigger.

That takes you to the V700/750.

As for the light table route, you probably know whether you're happy with an A2 print from a DSLR.
__________________
Col. Sebastian Moran, ret. (not really)

SLR, dSLR, and compact RF's. Black Yashica RFs; Nikon & Contax/Yashica SLRs; Nikon digital.
Where did all these cameras come from?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #4
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
 
whitecat's Avatar
 
whitecat is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,362
I use the V700 with great results.
__________________
My Gallery



Bessa III, Yashica Electro 35, Nikon 35 ti, Nikon 28 ti, Widelux F7, Contax TVS III, Minox, Contax N1, Minox 35 GT, Canonet QL17, and many more....
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #5
Pete B
Registered User
 
Pete B's Avatar
 
Pete B is online now
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 544
I'm please with my V700 too.
I might get the 7600 for 35mm.
Pete
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #6
Jamie123
Registered User
 
Jamie123 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,712
A V700 is probably the best you can get in that price class. Another option would be to use a scan service. ScanUnit (http://scanunit.com/) in the UK has very competitive prices for high end scans. An X5 scan is only £5/frame. Hard to beat.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #7
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 2,981
I'd say V700 or like Jamie says, send off for scans. You can get a lot of those £5 X5 scans for the cost of a scanner, then of course there is what your time is worth to you.

You may be able to pick up a Microtek in budget, reviews are a bit mixed though.
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-23-2012   #8
print44
Registered User
 
print44 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 771
Thanks for the responses. Sejanus - any light box MF shots you can post to offer comparison between the scanner derived images? It's an interesting idea.
The V700 seems to be ahead in the running. Presumably the Microtek you mention thegman is the artixscan f1?. I also wondered about the possibilities of the Minolta Scan Pro or possibly an Epson 4990.
__________________
James
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-23-2012   #9
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 479
I use a V500 for 120 and a Plustek 7500 for 135.

Both more than good enough.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.