Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras - > Other CSC Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Why has NX been such a failure?
Old 07-19-2012   #1
Avotius
Monster Rancher
 
Avotius's Avatar
 
Avotius is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chongqing, China
Posts: 3,439
Why has NX been such a failure?

Face it, Samsung's NX line of cameras and lenses has been a catastrophic failure.

No one buys them. I have never seen a person with one.

Yet there is a lot of lenses and bodies to choose from. Still, no one can be bothered.

What the heck did Samsung do wrong? Maybe they should have removed the name Samsung and it would have done better.
__________________
Flickr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #2
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,950
nobody talks NX here because it does not take M-lenses. "missing open goal" some member commented when specs became public.

but are they doing bad in market in general, hard to say. dont think they differ from Japanese compacts that much.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #3
Archlich
Registered User
 
Archlich is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 460
Because it's Samsung.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #4
zvos1
Registered User
 
zvos1's Avatar
 
zvos1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 282
Unfortunatelly for Samsung, this market segment has been very competitive lately. There are compacts with better sensors out there, for example Sony with their Nex line.
__________________
Of course it's all luck. - HCB

M4 and some digital stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #5
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,322
I think it's like with cars - people can buy worse vehicle for higher price just because they know name. Yes, Samsung makes also many average compacts, but they aren't average company. I don't know and care if they imitate or innovate, but clearly their EX1 (TL500) and successor model are worth attention, as NX system is. I noticed them in times of rebranded Pentax DSLRs - I don't care if pentaprism says Samsung not Pentax, I'm looking for value and performance not a name.
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #6
AJS Lamb
Registered User
 
AJS Lamb is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 57
Maybe it's marketing?

I've just acquired an NX200 (thanks, Robin) and think it's terrific. The 30 mm f2 pancake is a little gem and very competitively priced. What's not to like?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #7
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,770
Actually I tried the original nx10 while a rep was in my local camera store, and it was really pretty nice. Nicely made, nice viewfinder - kind of like a pre-OMD.

When I got home and looked at the files though it put the camera out of my mind. It uses a samsung sensor, and I really didn't like what the jpegs or raw through ACR were giving me. Something off about the color and tones.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #8
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 3,704
I suppose there is just no compelling reason to get one. With NEX, there is the tiny size or the high MP of the NEX-7, with m43, there is the range of lenses and the sexiness of some of the Olympus models. With X100, it's sexy with a great finder. Samsung? It just does not have any unique selling point, it's just too "blah".

Maybe once you've owned one a while, you realise it's great, but most people won't even give it a try, I mean, why would you?
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #9
AJS Lamb
Registered User
 
AJS Lamb is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 57
The Nex-7 is very, very expensive. The Samsung offers similar performance at a fraction of the price.

It all depends on what you want, of course. I was after a compact body and a small, fast prime.

When I compared various systems, I found it interesting that the NX was so low profile. There is something sexy about some m43 products but 20 meg and a bigger sensor swung it for me.

I've sure that there may be better systems out there but I'm happy with what I have.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #10
Aristophanes
Registered User
 
Aristophanes is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 670
Samsung sensors have traditionally lagged compared to Sony's, especially at high-ISO.

When that changes (and it will) Samsung will better compete.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #11
AJS Lamb
Registered User
 
AJS Lamb is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 57
"Samsung sensors have traditionally lagged compared to Sony's, especially at high-ISO."

Probably but the superiority comes with a significant price hike.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #12
Wouter
Registered User
 
Wouter's Avatar
 
Wouter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Joćo Pessoa - Brazil
Age: 55
Posts: 268
I have an nx10 with 2/30 and think it's a very good camera with excellent IQ. Even so, I'm selling it and want to buy an X100. Why? The design and ergonomics of the nx10 do not appeal to me - I don't 'connect' to it.
__________________
Wouter
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #13
Bill58
Native Texan
 
Bill58's Avatar
 
Bill58 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Korea
Posts: 2,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlich View Post
Because it's Samsung.
You beat me to it.....

Samsung enjoys an unbelievable monopoly in their home market w/ all their products, but can't compete when the going gets tough elsewhere.
__________________
My images of a strange land-So. Korea:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wrs111445/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #14
dct
Registered User
 
dct's Avatar
 
dct is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,087
Out of scope because it is technically very complicated to adopt M lenses to a NX body. And other RF lenses as well, I suppose. I don't get it why they didn't look at this point at Samsung... (like Sony, m4/3, Ricoh, Fuji)
__________________
photos
RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #15
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 4,526
Sensor and lens quality issues, whether current or past (and affecting the reputation only), aside, its mount is rather an obstacle when it comes to attaching alien manual focus lenses - too deep for Leica or C-mount, too narrow to work around that long flange distance, and not as readily dropping into some dumb "adapter" mode as Sony E cameras.

As the lens adapting geek crowd have been among the most visible early EVIL adopters on the net, alienating them left Samsung without any of the viral marketing push the competition got for free...
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #16
dufffader
Leicanaut/Nikonaut...
 
dufffader's Avatar
 
dufffader is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seoul
Posts: 203
Here in Seoul I do see Samsung NX (and other cameras) being used, but not significantly more than other Japanese (or german) brands. I guess it's more heavily promoted over here. But I've never had the chance to ask around why someone would buy Samsung, perhaps that would give some insights.
__________________
-bt [Leicanaut & Nikonaut]
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #17
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 3,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJS Lamb View Post
The Nex-7 is very, very expensive. The Samsung offers similar performance at a fraction of the price.

It all depends on what you want, of course. I was after a compact body and a small, fast prime.

When I compared various systems, I found it interesting that the NX was so low profile. There is something sexy about some m43 products but 20 meg and a bigger sensor swung it for me.

I've sure that there may be better systems out there but I'm happy with what I have.
I don't question for a second the NX is a great camera, I think it just does not have a "pull" to get in new customers. I'm considering a digital compact system right now, but Samsung just does not make the shortlist, and I can't even explain why!
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #18
richardhkirkando
Registered User
 
richardhkirkando is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 32
Posts: 252
Pretty obvious.

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #19
AJS Lamb
Registered User
 
AJS Lamb is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 57
" I'm considering a digital compact system right now, but Samsung just does not make the shortlist, and I can't even explain why!"

Fair enough! To each his, or her, own.

Before buying I went down to Jessops, on New Oxford street, where the service has improved beyond recognition, and checked out the NX as well as other systems. The NX appealed. Simple as that. Small camera, biggish sensor. Decent price.

However, it's fair to point out that I'm not going to build up a comprehensive system. Got all I need. If I was going to do that perhaps I would have considered other systems/formats etc.

Good luck in your search.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #20
Paddy C
Unused film collector
 
Paddy C is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Too far north for my liking
Posts: 792
1. (as already mentioned) it's Samsung (Sony got a pass because of their video heritage, Zeiss affiliation, and the purchase of Minolta's camera division).
2. Crappy sensor. I looked at comparisons early on and wrote it off.
3. It's Samsung.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #21
johnamazement
Registered User
 
johnamazement's Avatar
 
johnamazement is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Posts: 93
I've got an NX100 with the EVF and the 30mm lens. It's a nice compact package after a big DSLR and I love the lens, but I'm waiting for Samsung to catch up with the competition and come up with a body which does better high ISOs and maybe VR/IS.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #22
AJS Lamb
Registered User
 
AJS Lamb is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 57
DP Review gave the NX200 a seriously good review. I realise that this camera dates all the way back to 2011 but I am very forgiving.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #23
CK Dexter Haven
Registered User
 
CK Dexter Haven is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,085
When the NX10 was first out, i looked at it at the same time i was investigating the Pen and Panasonic mirrorless stuff. I disliked the Olympus and Panny, and liked the Samsung. That they also had a (good) 30/f2 pancake was icing. But, i waited, due to rumors of other impending systems. I'm still waiting.

Last month, i went to B&H, the SUPERstore, to check out the current situation. Saw the Sonys. Saw the Fujis. Still don't like the Olympus (even the OM-D). Still don't like the Panasonics.... Went, specifically to see the NX210... and could NOT find it. It wasn't on display in the central kiosk area. I was told to look at one of the counters. Didn't see it there. The rep behind that counter told me to go look in the 'pro' section behind the counter. Didn't see it there, either. I ended up just leaving. It might be a great camera, but when even B&H makes it impossible to see, it doesn't seem the system is being supported, retail-wise, well enough to survive in this market.

It's a shame, as the new bodies look sorta like the NEX, but with the advantage of that great small lens....
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #24
kshapero
Photo guy
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 8,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJS Lamb View Post
"Samsung sensors have traditionally lagged compared to Sony's, especially at high-ISO."

Probably but the superiority comes with a significant price hike.
I though they both use the exact same Sony sensor, no?
__________________
Akiva S.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #25
burancap
Registered User
 
burancap's Avatar
 
burancap is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Carolina
Age: 49
Posts: 1,614
Samsung... in the states that most likely means a TV to 99% of the people.

Me: I didn't even know they made a camera(s).
__________________
Jeff @ flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:31.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.