Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Photography General Interest

Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Visible clicks
Old 07-17-2012   #1
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Visible clicks

Yesterday I started a highly sophisticated scientific research project

Visible clicks - shuttersound made visible! I mounted a microphone on top of my cameras (mostly in the flash shoe, where available), set the shutter to 1/60 (where possible) and recorded the sound.

The most amazing and unexpected result: some are louder than others

Enjoy! Some more to come (5 per day)

Agfa Optima:


Voigtländer Bessa R3A:


Bronica ETR:


Leica IIf:


Leica M2:
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #2
loquax ludens
Registered User
 
loquax ludens's Avatar
 
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 678
Cool. I'd like to see what a Minolta Autocord sounds like. And a Minox III.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #3
daveleo
Registered User
 
daveleo's Avatar
 
daveleo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central Mass. (USA)
Posts: 1,262
Wicked interesting !
Keep them coming.

I have a few Nikons that will easily peg you dB meter
__________________
Dave

http://www.cafephotos.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #4
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
 
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,182
Very neat! Yes, keep them coming. (The Optima is a leaf shutter, right? This may help put to rest the notion that the Leica shutters are "whisper quiet." Perhaps a stage whisper....)
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #5
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,346
Interesting. Thanks!

If you were in the USA I would send you a Yashica TL Super to test. My first SLR and I loved it. But especially with the back open, that thing would wake the dead.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #6
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by loquax ludens View Post
Cool. I'd like to see what a Minolta Autocord sounds like. And a Minox III.
I don't have those - will Rolleiflex and Olympus XA be OK?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveleo View Post
I have a few Nikons that will easily peg you dB meter
Some Nikons in the next few days (2 with motor, 3 without) - stay tuned!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoNickon View Post
The Optima is a leaf shutter, right? This may help put to rest the notion that the Leica shutters are "whisper quiet."
Yes, leaf shutter! You will like the Rollei, too!

Quote:
Originally Posted by oftheherd View Post
If you were in the USA I would send you a Yashica TL Super to test. My first SLR and I loved it. But especially with the back open, that thing would wake the dead.
I don't think it could beat my Bronica ETR
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-17-2012   #7
loquax ludens
Registered User
 
loquax ludens's Avatar
 
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRohlfing View Post
I don't have those - will Rolleiflex and Olympus XA be OK?
Sure! You're the one putting in the effort, after all.

But the Olympus XA is nothing like the MInox III. That's the 8x11mm very tiny camera that Walter Zapp invented, not the 35mm compact. That little Minox III has a surprisingly noisy shutter for its size. Or so it seems to me, anyway, which is why I think it'd be nice to see how loud it is.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #8
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Now come the Nikons!

Nikon F without motor:


Nikon F2 without motor:


Nikon F3 without motor:


Nikon F5:


Nikon F100:
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #9
daveleo
Registered User
 
daveleo's Avatar
 
daveleo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central Mass. (USA)
Posts: 1,262
I'm thinking that this should be a standard chart issued with the camera specs.

Is this correct ? : the total sound energy is the area (red area) under these curves. In other words, peak dB is one thing, but total noise energy is even more important ?
__________________
Dave

http://www.cafephotos.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #10
dct
Registered User
 
dct's Avatar
 
dct is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,012
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRohlfing View Post
Now come the Nikons!
[...]
Nikon F100:
This looks more like a "concerto grosso" !

Is a microphone + some software enough to do the same tests like you did? It would be nice having a thread with the most RFF related cameras in.
__________________
photos
RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #11
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveleo View Post
I'm thinking that this should be a standard chart issued with the camera specs.

Is this correct ? : the total sound energy is the area (red area) under these curves. In other words, peak dB is one thing, but total noise energy is even more important ?
Would be interesting, if the camera manufacturers included a chart like that. But then the test should be done in a better controlled environment and with calibrated hardware. And anyway - before buying a camera, just try to get it in your greedy hands in a shop and listen wether you like the sound.

I did this with a rather cheap and primitive microphone and with the sound recorder that was installed on my PC anyway ("WavePurity" - which is software to remove noise when recording old analogue records). So I do not know about the total sound energy. Also, the microphone was mounted on top of the camera, so it gets all the vibrations of the camera, too (which was intended, but might change the quality of the sound).

Maybe I should do another test with the microphone a little (say, 1 meter or so) away from the camera?

Also, a comparison with / without mirror lockup might be interesting?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #12
loquax ludens
Registered User
 
loquax ludens's Avatar
 
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 678
Interesting. What about the subjective perception of sound?

To pick a couple of examples, the Nikon 100 has a low average amplitude, but a long duration, relative to the Nikon F2 without motor. The latter is of shorter duration, but greater amplitude. Which one sounds lounder to your ear?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #13
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by dct View Post
This looks more like a "concerto grosso" !

Is a microphone + some software enough to do the same tests like you did? It would be nice having a thread with the most RFF related cameras in.
[DISCLAIMER] This test is just for fun, it is not a scientific test! See the smilies in the original post! [\DISCLAIMER]

Also, these are my cameras (and some are quite old) - your camera might sound different!

But anyway, some results are quite interesting - the F100, though more or less a "sister" of the F5, has quite a different sound.

RFF related cameras: Some are still to come - for alphabetical reasons some rangefinders tend to come last

Oh, and you will see no digital camera - simply because I do not have one in the moment!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #14
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by loquax ludens View Post
Interesting. What about the subjective perception of sound?

To pick a couple of examples, the Nikon 100 has a low average amplitude, but a long duration, relative to the Nikon F2 without motor. The latter is of shorter duration, but greater amplitude. Which one sounds lounder to your ear?
The F2 sounds louder to me, but the F100 sounds longer and softer (though there was no film in there, the motor moved).

The loudest to me is definitely the Bronica and the most quiet the Rolleiflex (still to come).
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #15
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Nikonos IV-A:


Olympus 35RC:


Olympus 35SP:


Olympus XA:


Voigtländer Vitomatic IIa:
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #16
ChrisN
Striving
 
ChrisN's Avatar
 
ChrisN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,292
Pitch and duration can be more important than outright volume in determining what seems to be noticably loud.
__________________
Chris


"The mission of photography is to explain man to man and each to himself. And that is the most complicated thing on earth."
Edward Steichen

RFF Gallery

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #17
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,081
this would be more fun for me if i understood the charts...
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #18
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
this would be more fun for me if i understood the charts...
It's easy - simplified explanation:
Horizontally: Time (e.g. Nikon F100 - noise for more than 1/4 second, Vitomatic - only about 1/20 second)
Vertically: the more, the noisier!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #19
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
 
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,182
I'm glad you did a Nikonos -- the amount of muffling that the stout body and seals provide is remarkable. And look at that Voigtlander. The leaf shutter cameras will put everything else to shame. (I hope you've got a Bronica S2 or the like and a Pentax 67 coming, for serious contrast.)

Regarding the charts -- I don't understand why they show both positive and negative decibels. But maybe I just don't understand what makes up sound.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #20
ColSebastianMoran
Registered User
 
ColSebastianMoran's Avatar
 
ColSebastianMoran is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 897
Great stuff. Thanks!
__________________
Col. Sebastian Moran, ret. (not really)

SLR, dSLR, and compact RF's. Black Yashica RFs; Nikon & Contax/Yashica SLRs; Nikon digital.
Where did all these cameras come from?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #21
MRohlfing
Registered User
 
MRohlfing's Avatar
 
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
Olympus OM-1:


Olympus OM-2n:


Olympus OM-4:


Rolleiflex E:


Yashica Electro 35:
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #22
ColSebastianMoran
Registered User
 
ColSebastianMoran's Avatar
 
ColSebastianMoran is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 897
Hexar AF in silent mode??
__________________
Col. Sebastian Moran, ret. (not really)

SLR, dSLR, and compact RF's. Black Yashica RFs; Nikon & Contax/Yashica SLRs; Nikon digital.
Where did all these cameras come from?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-20-2012   #23
loquax ludens
Registered User
 
loquax ludens's Avatar
 
loquax ludens is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 678
Whoa, look at that Rolleiflex! Puts 'em ALL to shame.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #24
krötenblender
Registered User
 
krötenblender's Avatar
 
krötenblender is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoNickon View Post
Regarding the charts -- I don't understand why they show both positive and negative decibels.
They don't. At the top and at the bottom there is both -3db. Its a simple waveform-display over time with negative db on the y-axis.

If you have some experience with such standard displays of sound, you can get a pretty good idea about the loudness-distribution. To get also an idea, which is more "annoying", an overlayed display of the frequency-distribution would help very much, a.k.a. fourier-transformation.

Very nice idea for a thread, though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2012   #25
goodtimes
Registered User
 
goodtimes's Avatar
 
goodtimes is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRohlfing View Post
Yesterday I started a highly sophisticated scientific research project

Visible clicks - shuttersound made visible! I mounted a microphone on top of my cameras (mostly in the flash shoe, where available), set the shutter to 1/60 (where possible) and recorded the sound.

The most amazing and unexpected result: some are louder than others

Enjoy! Some more to come (5 per day)

Agfa Optima:


Voigtländer Bessa R3A:


Bronica ETR:


Leica IIf:


Leica M2:
What software do you use ? I'd like to use it and see if I can measure the various actions performed by the shutter curtains.
Thanks
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8487951@N05/

Good Light
Goodtimes
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:12.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.