Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-24-2012   #51
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd View Post
It seems to have contacts, but no rangefinder arm. I guess that would have been asking too much, moreover with no room for it.
What would be the purpose of a rangefinder arm connection??? What am I missing here?
You could have a visual display of the focusing distance (like a distance scale at the bottom of the viewfinder, together with DOF information for a few apertures, possibly configurable). Not a big thing, more of a nice-to-have, like scale focusing except you have the scale in the viewfinder. Unlikely to happen at all, though, given the space constraints.

Also you could have other distance-related information, such as parallax- and size-corrected framelines, distance information recorded in the EXIF, distance information for flash control etc.
I still don't understand how that would work, the adapter is just not deep enough for a mechanical cam roller.
Isn't that basically what I said in the first posting you quoted? (Emphasis added)
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #52
kermaier
Registered User
 
kermaier's Avatar
 
kermaier is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by palec View Post
Most 35mm lenses marked as not mountable? Interesting, I wouldn't call 35mm focal length problematic.
It looks like the lenses with the more deeply-protruding rear elements are flagged, no?
__________________
Epson R-D1s with far too many lenses
Fuji X100

FS: Nikkor 28/3.5 LTM
FS: Canon 35/2.8 LTM
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #53
palec
Registered User
 
palec's Avatar
 
palec is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermaier View Post
It looks like the lenses with the more deeply-protruding rear elements are flagged, no?
Well, Summilux 35 v1 and Summicron 35 V4 (marked in list as 3rd 1980年~) have minimal protruding rears (and are not supported according to list), much less then Summicron 35 ASPH or Elmarit 28 v3 (which are are supported).
__________________
flickr photostream
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #54
kermaier
Registered User
 
kermaier's Avatar
 
kermaier is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by palec View Post
Well, Summilux 35 v1 and Summicron 35 V4 (marked in list as 3rd 1980年~) have minimal protruding rears (and are not supported according to list), much less then Summicron 35 ASPH or Elmarit 28 v3 (which are are supported).
Hmm. I thought there was some physical issue that made the pre-Ashperical 'Lux problematic on the M8/M9? Same for the early production of the CV 35/1.2 Nokton v1, I think. But that does seem odd about the v4 'Cron....
__________________
Epson R-D1s with far too many lenses
Fuji X100

FS: Nikkor 28/3.5 LTM
FS: Canon 35/2.8 LTM
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #55
noimmunity
phound photography
 
noimmunity's Avatar
 
noimmunity is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lyon/Taipei
Age: 50
Posts: 2,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
My M9 will be sold soon... (but not because of the adapter).
Good time to make that move.
Look forward to seeing your reports on the X2.
__________________
jon 小強

搬到畫國後免疫系統變得超強,所過的生活宅到不行!

The old adage says: Seeing is believing. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.

No-immunity Bodies: DP Merrills, Fuji X-Pro1, Leica M-E. Too much dust made me immune to film T_T

my neglected flickr
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

my hopes are simple
Old 05-24-2012   #56
ananobes
Registered User
 
ananobes is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6
my hopes are simple

My hopes for this adapter are much more simple.... and they are that it will:

* make the OVF actually usable!

With fuji lenses the brightness of the information displayed in the OVF (framelines, ISO, shutter speed ect) changes automatically depending on the brightness of the scene.

With legacy lenses this does not happen... rendering the OVF useless in most bright conditions such as an outdoor scene during daylight. Left with only the EVF the XP1 is just another EVIL camera first attempt with a number of usability flaws.

Please give me the ability to set focus with EVF or OVF and then use the OVF to frame and set exposure.

Oh... any maybe also:

* allow exposure compensation in full manual mode

Being restricted to the full stop settings of the shutter speed dial is ridiculousness.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #57
dougi
Registered User
 
dougi is offline
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
Age: 44
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by ananobes View Post
My hopes for this adapter are much more simple.... and they are that it will:

* make the OVF actually usable!

With fuji lenses the brightness of the information displayed in the OVF (framelines, ISO, shutter speed ect) changes automatically depending on the brightness of the scene.

With legacy lenses this does not happen... rendering the OVF useless in most bright conditions such as an outdoor scene during daylight. Left with only the EVF the XP1 is just another EVIL camera first attempt with a number of usability flaws.

Please give me the ability to set focus with EVF or OVF and then use the OVF to frame and set exposure.

Oh... any maybe also:

* allow exposure compensation in full manual mode

Being restricted to the full stop settings of the shutter speed dial is ridiculousness.
Hopefully, given that it is a smart adapter, it will know that a lens it attached and will provide the correct OVF brightness. We will have to wait and see!
__________________
x-pro 1, x-100, m8, k5, lx5, bessa R2, FED3, ep1,
35mm Summicron ASPH, 28mm M-Hexanon, 50mm F1.5 VC, 75mm F1.8 VC, 15mm F4.5 VC
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2012   #58
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,986
I use the OVF/EVF toggle method frequently with the Fujinon lenses. I would hope Fuji adds a zoom option with a lower magnification because of my shaky hands. Having normal, mid and high zoom modes would be useful. With the XP1 fine adjustments with the 35/1.4 fly-by-wire focus barrel are not a problem. I would expect an analog lens would be even easier to focus once the focus was close.
__________________
"Perspective is governed by where you stand – object size and the angle of view included in the picture is determined by focal length." H.S. Newcombe

Self-Induced Transparency Photography, FLICKR, Professional Portfolio.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #59
mouren
Registered User
 
mouren is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by ananobes View Post

* allow exposure compensation in full manual mode

Being restricted to the full stop settings of the shutter speed dial is ridiculousness.
You can do that by pressing the left and right button on the back. Yes, the dial is in full stop, but with the left and right arrows, you can change in 1/3 steps in either direction.

This is in the manual btw.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #60
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,104
The lens compatibility list makes no sense. I guess we have to wait and see.
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #61
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by noimmunity View Post
Look forward to seeing your reports on the X2.
I'll try to post some photos within weeks of getting the camera. I'm not the testing type... it either works or it doesn't. However, I'll at least be able to say how I think it compares to the X1, the X100, the GXR, and the X-Pro1.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #62
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
I use the OVF/EVF toggle method frequently with the Fujinon lenses. I would hope Fuji adds a zoom option with a lower magnification because of my shaky hands. Having normal, mid and high zoom modes would be useful. With the XP1 fine adjustments with the 35/1.4 fly-by-wire focus barrel are not a problem. I would expect an analog lens would be even easier to focus once the focus was close.
I would love a lower magnification option.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #63
ananobes
Registered User
 
ananobes is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouren View Post
You can do that by pressing the left and right button on the back. Yes, the dial is in full stop, but with the left and right arrows, you can change in 1/3 steps in either direction.

This is in the manual btw.
Great pick-up mouren. That's another work-around happily. But, that's all it appears to be, a happy coincidence.

I checked the manual and under Manual Exposure p.27 it makes no mention of being able to adjust the shutter speed in 1/3 increments, with the use of the selector switch or in any other way. Good pickup.

Although, it is mentioned under Program AE (P) p.24 and Long Time Exposure p.28

For Program AE (P) I quote:

"Program Shift : If desired, you can press the selector left or right to other combinations of shutter speed and aperture without altering exposure (program shift)."

It goes on to say that this is not available if "an auto option is selected for ISO in the shooting menu". Well, program shift isn't but changing the exposure is. The selector switch will change either the ISO (if Auto ISO is selected) or shutter speed as you picked up.

This appears to be just another undocumented operation of a camera whose firmware appears written by non photographers whose only previous camera experience was with their phone.

For Long Time Exposure (T/B) it again does not appear relevant, being available to select speeds between 2 and 30 seconds.

Like the operation of the AE-L/AF-L button I find many aspects of the XP1 incomplete, illogical, complicated and often totally random (undocumented).

As a result I am waiting on this M adapter and new firmware in the hope things improve. As it stands and without Adobe raw support I will use my other cameras and leave the XP1 on the desk.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #64
aleksanderpolo
Registered User
 
aleksanderpolo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by f16sunshine View Post
The lens compatibility list makes no sense. I guess we have to wait and see.
Andy,

1. Fuji has 35/1.4
2. Almost all modern 35mm lens are incompatible

Coincidence? I think not

P.S. 50mm frameline is not one of the preset... um...
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-26-2012   #65
viboons
Registered User
 
viboons is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
One of my concern about using M lens with XPRO1 is soft edge with most of my lens. Hope the Fuji adaptor fix this issue.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-26-2012   #66
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by viboons
One of my concern about using M lens with XPRO1 is soft edge with most of my lens. Hope the Fuji adaptor fix this issue.
Absolutely no chance.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #67
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,219
Any 39mm-to-M adaptor should fit into the Fuji adaptor. So effectively, yes.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #68
CVickery
Registered User
 
CVickery is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermaier View Post
It looks like the lenses with the more deeply-protruding rear elements are flagged, no?
I thought that might be the issue, but my ZM 21/4.5 has a very deep rear element and it's flagged as OK. The description they have of the Summicron 35s' seem a little off as well, mine is a version IV AFAIK, but they seem to call it a '3rd' (according to Fuji) and also a 'no go'. The Summicron barely protrudes past the lens mount. I've been trying to figure out this issue and have drawn a blank.


Sorry...noticed a similar response further on in the thread.
__________________
_____________________________________
M2, M9, GXR A12 M
Zeiss ZM 25/2.8, Leica Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH, Summicron M 50/2 Coll, Canon 100/2
Other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #69
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermaier View Post
It looks like the lenses with the more deeply-protruding rear elements are flagged, no?
I used the c-biogon on the Fuji and it has a large rear element. Some of them listed don't have anything protruding past the mount. Weird.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #70
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,219
I think this has more to do with whether the lens has a Fuji-sponsored correction profile and less to do with mechanical interference.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #71
CVickery
Registered User
 
CVickery is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog View Post
I think this has more to do with whether the lens has a Fuji-sponsored correction profile and less to do with mechanical interference.
If you read the instructions for the adapter, I think you'll find that there are no profiles. You have to define the settings for each focal length for distortion, peripheral illumination and color shading. The focal length choices are 21mm, 24mm, 28mm and 35mm plus 2 more user defined focal lengths (probably EVF only).

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/dig...ter/index.html

I would think that perhaps the lenses in question require settings beyond the range offered, but the ZM21/4.5 is noted for being a difficult lens to correct and is OK for the Fuji. ???
__________________
_____________________________________
M2, M9, GXR A12 M
Zeiss ZM 25/2.8, Leica Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH, Summicron M 50/2 Coll, Canon 100/2
Other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #72
CVickery
Registered User
 
CVickery is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
Reading further, I notice that the adapter comes with a gauge to determine is a lens is compatible. It would seem that there is a physical restriction for some lenses. Perhaps diameter of the rear element?
__________________
_____________________________________
M2, M9, GXR A12 M
Zeiss ZM 25/2.8, Leica Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH, Summicron M 50/2 Coll, Canon 100/2
Other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #73
segedi
RFicianado
 
segedi's Avatar
 
segedi is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 852
More likely depth of the rear element is the reason for the gauge. The Ricoh A12 M mount also comes with one of these. If the lens is too deep it would smash into the sensor.
__________________
-----------------------

Segedi.com

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #74
CVickery
Registered User
 
CVickery is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by segedi View Post
More likely depth of the rear element is the reason for the gauge. The Ricoh A12 M mount also comes with one of these. If the lens is too deep it would smash into the sensor.
As I noted before, that's not true of the lenses that aren't compatible. The ZM21/4.5 for example protrudes well into the body and is compatible and the Summicron 35 barely goes deeper than the mount but isn't compatible. That's why some of us are confused about the compatible list.
__________________
_____________________________________
M2, M9, GXR A12 M
Zeiss ZM 25/2.8, Leica Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH, Summicron M 50/2 Coll, Canon 100/2
Other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-27-2012   #75
Contarama
Registered User
 
Contarama is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
I don't know but everytime someone says smash or crash into the sensor I about freak out...
__________________
Art is the ability to make something...even if it is a big mess...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.