Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-11-2012   #26
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
I'll wait for the "Film is dead" threads to appear... Oh wait.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #27
Sparrow
Stewart McBride
 
Sparrow's Avatar
 
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenhill View Post
Maybe XP2 ... Been wanting to try it
Different look but 'looks' lovely
Yep, looks lovely and a dream to scan ... bit pricey this side of the pond
__________________
Regards Stewart

Stewart McBride



You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.

flickr stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #28
santela
Registered User
 
santela is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 102
Buy a monochrome M...

NOT!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #29
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrrobleyleica View Post
I wonder what Sebastião Salgado will do?
I don't think it's going to matter to him... he moved on from roll film use years ago.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #30
boomguy57
Registered User
 
boomguy57's Avatar
 
boomguy57 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 30
Posts: 1,153
Like the OP said..."I'm keen on returning to it [film]". If people aren't buying it, they can wax nostalgic all they like on film and it will go away.

If you want fil to stick around, buy some.
__________________
Website ~ Blog ~ Flickr ~ Tumblr ~ Books

Enough of the black-white arguments, let's examine the (18%) gray area. After all:
"Only a Sith deals in absolutes." - Obi-Wan Kenobi
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #31
sig
Registered User
 
sig is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 481
I wiuld use something else,............
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #32
Messsucherkamera
Registered User
 
Messsucherkamera is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
So is film dying then? ... you'd think someone would have posted a thread about it before now
Film is dying?? Hell, I didn't even know it was sick!
__________________
"The winter leeks
have been washed white
how cold it is!"


- Matsuo Basho
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #33
gb hill
Registered User
 
gb hill's Avatar
 
gb hill is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina
Age: 53
Posts: 5,079
Tri-X will out live ALL of us so I aint worried about it. I like shooting the Arista EDU 400 film so I buy that mostly anyhow!
__________________
flickr
Blog
ipernity
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #34
unixrevolution
Registered User
 
unixrevolution's Avatar
 
unixrevolution is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 432
We will all be dead and stinking before Tri-X goes away.

Film is alive. Film is healthy. Film is real. Embrace it. Touch it. Shoot it.
__________________
Please, call me Erik.
Find me on: Flickr | PentaxForums | Large Format Photography Forum

"Cameras are for looking through, not looking at."
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #35
DamenS
Registered User
 
DamenS is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
I don't think it's going to matter to him... he moved on from roll film use years ago.
Yes - he's been using digital for ages now. However, he still gets his digital files printed on a film negative before it is printed so I'm assuming this part of his process would have to change if film was to die.
__________________
Konica Hexar AF, Fuji GW690III, Crown Graphic, Nikon 35ti
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #36
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 16,120
shoot more digital ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #37
Paul Luscher
Registered User
 
Paul Luscher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 681
Buy a M9M?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #38
stratcat
Registered User
 
stratcat is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 451
I, like many others, don't think Tri-X is going to die soon... But if it where to happen in my lifetime, I'll just go on shooting whichever other B&W film is still available. T-Max, Delta, HP5+....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #39
anjoca76
Registered User
 
anjoca76's Avatar
 
anjoca76 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 497
Should Tri-X be discontinued, I will throw myself off a cliff because my life will no longer have any meaning...

Joking aside, though I do love Tri-X and it is my most-used b&w film, Ilford's films are just as good, and in fact are probably even a little better at times.

Tri-X ain't dead yet, and neither are lots of other emulsions. On the contrary, although there are less and less choices lately, the films that are still being made are, in my admittedly novice opinion, quite remarkable. Instead of always lamenting the death of a medium that is still being produced and made available to us, how about just buying it and shooting it while it's still here?

I can still buy vinyl records. I can still buy needles for my grandma's 120 year old victrola--and find folks who service those old phonographs. I can still buy cassettes. Atari consoles are still available. Landlines are still here. I know nothing about ham radios, but my guess is that there are people out there who still engage in that too. If I want to sit down and write a letter and bring it to the post office, as opposed to typing out an email, I can. The list of things still available to us that are supposed to have been dead for years are still out there to be enjoyed should we choose to enjoy them. Film will never completely go away in my lifetime (I'm 104 years old--just kidding, 35 . Stop talking about film's end and just shoot it. The best way to keep it around is to buy it and use it. Sheesh.
__________________
Andy

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #40
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,651
Tri-X is not dead yet.
If it does, I'll be more than happy to give my money to Ilford, Foma, Adox, Lucky, whomever.

Meanwhile I'll continue to show people around me that film photography is both satisfying and rewarding. 50% of them will listen, the others won't. That's life.

Now stop being depressed and shoot your film cameras this weekend
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #41
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 921
Keep shooting TMAX400.
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #42
Speedfreak
-
 
Speedfreak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrrobleyleica View Post
what will the film die hards do when their fave medium finally bites the dust?
Whine a little here and there, everything was better back then, bla bla... and then buy a small digital camera and forget about film.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #43
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,287
I'd be forced to break in to my large (and growing) stash of frozen films that I love.
I'll just shoot the stash till one of us is used up.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #44
anjoca76
Registered User
 
anjoca76's Avatar
 
anjoca76 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Borger View Post
Keep shooting TMAX400.
Probably the best answer yet. I just recently shot my first couple rolls of Tmax 400 and kicked myself for having not tried it sooner. I really, really liked the results.
__________________
Andy

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #45
maxwell1295
Registered User
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
maxwell1295 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 385
Shoot for a few years with my super secret stash of Arista Premium 400...
__________________
Canon EOS 3, Kiev 4 & 4a, Olympus OM-1
Pentax 6x7, Polaroid 340, Rollei 35S, Rollei 35,
Yashica Mat 124G, Zeiss Ikon Nettar 518/16

My Website
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #46
Teuthida
-
 
Teuthida is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 647
continue to shoot hp5, which I've always prefered.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #47
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
Yep, looks lovely and a dream to scan ... bit pricey this side of the pond
You can spool it yourself to get the price down, XP2 in 100' rolls costs around 75 EUR new and you get around 20 rolls of film out of that.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #48
mwoenv
Registered User
 
mwoenv is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Monroe, NY
Age: 58
Posts: 132
According to this article in 2011, citing an AP report, film sales are expected to be "as low as 20 million rolls this year" (http://www.ephotozine.com/article/35...-slowing-16617)

Assuming $4 per roll, roll film sales would be approximately an $80 million per year business. Several small to mid-size manufacturring plants could produce all of the world's demand, so the large producers like Kodak and Fuji will have to decide if they want to be part of a much smaller business compared to what they had or to just get out of the business. But it should still be a viable business for several firms. If Kodak and Fuji do decide to exit, you would think they would get some final revenue by selling or licensing their best formulations for others to make.

Also, it not clear if this includes cinema film. My understanding is that nearly all movies are shot digitially now but film is used for backup as digitial archival integrity is a concern. So film sales may be even higher.

Overall, I'm not worried about film disappearing.
__________________
Konica III; Konica Auto S2; Pentax 645; Yashica Mat 124; Minolta SRT201, X700, X370, XD-11, Minolta Hi-matic 7S; Zeiss Ikon Contaflex Super BC
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #49
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamenS View Post
Yes - he's been using digital for ages now. However, he still gets his digital files printed on a film negative before it is printed so I'm assuming this part of his process would have to change if film was to die.
Right, which is why I said roll film... or do they use roll film for that process? Perhaps he's moved onto something like the Lieca S2 by now?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #50
Fawley
Registered User
 
Fawley is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwoenv View Post
According to this article in 2011, citing an AP report, film sales are expected to be "as low as 20 million rolls this year" (http://www.ephotozine.com/article/35...-slowing-16617)

If Kodak and Fuji do decide to exit, you would think they would get some final revenue by selling or licensing their best formulations for others to make.
I agree. I suspect that as long as Kodak is in the film business they will be making TriX. When they do exit I would be very surprised if another manufacturer doesn't pick up the rights to the name and formulation. After all, its the most recognized name in BW photography.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.