Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-22-2012   #51
Speedfreak
-
 
Speedfreak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
Canon FD is excellent. The older breech-lock lenses are "heavy duty", the new FD type lenses are super compact and fit well with mirrorless digital.

I have used all sorts of lenses in the last years. Comparing FD to Nikon I simply fail to see why Nikon was considered "pro" back then while Canon FD (or Minolta) was not.

I also remember Leica guru Erwin Puts stating on his website, that if there would not have been Leica he would have chosen Canon as a system. The FD series had the edge in optics back then, according to him.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #52
Uncle Bill
Registered User
 
Uncle Bill's Avatar
 
Uncle Bill is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oakville (somewhere west of Toronto) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 867
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Nikon was viewed as being a better system than the Canon FD system, and the prices usually were higher for Nikkor lenses. I chose the FD instead.

I kept all my FD lenses and cameras.

Agreed mostly and while I'm a Nikon guy, I do think FD glass is on par and in some cases better than some Nikkor glass.
__________________
Leica M3 and M4-2, Rolleicord IV, Rolleiflex Series E 3.5 Planar version 1<a
http://flickr.com/photos/funwithcameras
http://funwithcameras.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-26-2012   #53
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,725
I heard of some pros having custom adaptions for the Canon 500/4.5L into Nikon mount, so the optics were certainly on par with the Nikkor lenses. I uased to have a few Nikon and a few Canon lenses and cameras, and when the Canon AF system came out, and Canon deserted the FD mount, I did the switch from Nikon to Canon since prices for excellent FD optics fell dramatically. The Nikon cameras seemed to be preferred. The F2 and then F3 were widely seen as pro cameras, whereas the F1n and F1N were maybe seen as less pro ... I don't know.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-26-2012   #54
DominikDUK
Registered User
 
DominikDUK's Avatar
 
DominikDUK is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 294
Nikons were considered pro because of the cameras not because of the lenses. I am mostly a Nikon guy and recently bought a FT-Ql for next to nothing. The out of focus rendering of the Canon's is smoother and mostly better than Nikon's sharpness is about equal.

FD lenses were often converted for motion picture camera use. Panavision uses FD elements for some of their tele lenses. This shows how good these lenses are.

Dominik
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2012   #55
OlliL
Registered User
 
OlliL is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 26
Posts: 677
Bought a Nex-3 and got an FD adapter with it.
Back to the 50mm F1.4 S.S.C Bokeh balls.


Bok-crazy von oliverleschke auf Flickr
__________________
Kind regards,
Oliver
  Reply With Quote

Old 3 Weeks Ago   #56
filmfan
passez le fromage
 
filmfan's Avatar
 
filmfan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 27
Posts: 4,166
Looking back on all the cameras and lenses I have owned, I think the Canon FD 35mm f/2 lens was one of the absolute best lenses I have used.
__________________
@Web
@Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 3 Weeks Ago   #57
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,761
I was recently given a Canon A-1 with a third party lens....the lens was a bit hazy so I started looking for another one...I was able to find an FD 50mm 1.4 SSC lens for about $50
I haven't used it enough to form an opinion as yet but I do like what I see through the viewfinder...I was thinking of getting a wide angle lens for it but have decided to wait until I've used the camera a bit longer...
I don't want to complicate this camera with a bunch of lenses so it's the 50mm for now...next lens would most likely be a 24mm...

Interesting that this thread was started a year ago today...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:07.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.