Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-29-2012   #26
bigeye
Registered User
 
bigeye's Avatar
 
bigeye is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1,147
Ryan:

Impressed by your shots - 'from the camera' or not. (It's amazing how much better the slide guitar shot is in B&W.)

As with Domagojs's comments on the comparison shots, there are some flared background bits (and some moire inside the picture in the background), that adds some tension to the fuji image.

- Charlie
__________________
Anything that is very simple is apt to be sloppy. - Elliott Erwitt

I bought a new camera. It's so advanced you don't even need it. - Steven Wright
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #27
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,990
I think you are more than good enough to use a $9,000 camera. However your work will not suffer in the least if you keep using what you have now.
__________________
"Perspective is governed by where you stand – object size and the angle of view included in the picture is determined by focal length." H.S. Newcombe

Self-Induced Transparency Photography, FLICKR, Professional Portfolio.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #28
brachal
Refrigerated User
 
brachal's Avatar
 
brachal is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Orleans, La
Age: 44
Posts: 1,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan1938 View Post
At the end of the day, what I really want is an M9... or an M10 - whatever that ends up being... But I'm not a good enough photographer to use a $9000 camera.
A friend of mine like to say, "It's not the wand that matters; it's the magician."
__________________
Bill

My Gallery

Me on flickr

"Living in fear is just another way of dying before your time." DBT
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #29
Ryan1938
Registered User
 
Ryan1938 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Thanks fellas... Maybe I just got lucky and posted images that have some salt to them. In any case, I've got buddies that are real photographers. I'm not one of them and I'm totally cool with that!

As for the XP1, I'm still really enjoying it. So much so, that I'm now starting to think about that wide angle to sit along side my 35mm...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #30
Landshark99
Registered User
 
Landshark99 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreak View Post
What you see here is more Silver FX than Fuji. There is nothing "like film" in a digital camera. But it can be tweaked in post. (Which leads me to the question why not just shoot film in the beginning, but whatever...)

Nice shots anyway.
unless you wet print in a darkroom, once you scan negatives you are shooting digital
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #31
Leigh Youdale
Registered User
 
Leigh Youdale is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landshark99 View Post
unless you wet print in a darkroom, once you scan negatives you are shooting digital
A bit pedantic I think, and not accurate anyway. I can't quite see that when the inputs are different in the first place you can say it's one or the other. Hybrid, yes. Digital, partly. Analogue, partly. Does it matter? No.
The image is the end product, whether on screen or print, and that's the objective. Everything else is simply a means of getting there. Some choose one road, others prefer another way. Who cares?
__________________

Fuji X10
Leica M6
Bessa R4A
Rolleiflex (3): E2 Planar 2.8, WA & Tele
Nikkormat FTn (2)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #32
Ryan1938
Registered User
 
Ryan1938 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
I'm not one to care... at all. I just like take pictures. I prefer my M6, but the XP1 is a ball too...

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #33
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 61
Posts: 16,105
try the green filter setting for BW people shooting ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-29-2012   #34
Landshark99
Registered User
 
Landshark99 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leigh Youdale View Post
A bit pedantic I think, and not accurate anyway. I can't quite see that when the inputs are different in the first place you can say it's one or the other. Hybrid, yes. Digital, partly. Analogue, partly. Does it matter? No.
The image is the end product, whether on screen or print, and that's the objective. Everything else is simply a means of getting there. Some choose one road, others prefer another way. Who cares?
I agree all that matters is the image in the end.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:56.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.