Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Bigger than 35 RF's > Large Format RF

Large Format RF Forum for Large Format Rangefinders (generally 4x5 or larger format) iIncluding Linhof 4x5, Graflex 4x5, and other Large Format Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

MPP Micro Technical mk. VIII and polaroid back
Old 04-23-2012   #1
Meakin
Registered User
 
Meakin's Avatar
 
Meakin is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 181
MPP Micro Technical mk. VIII and polaroid back

Well, It seems I have evolved (devolved?) to 4x5 LF. from 35mm.

As of this moment I'm waiting for a MPP mk.VIII to arrive with a couple of lenses and various other bits and bobs, hence my first post in this fine forum.

I am looking to get a polaroid back for it, and have been researching what fits and whats available........the result ? - utter confusion

Seems some backs fit and some don't (depending on who you ask, naturally), and I was hoping somebody here knew something from experience and would care to shed some light on the subject.

So - anybody know what polaroid back's fits the MPP mk.VIII and takes available (as in still being produced) instant film?

Thanks, I'm really looking forward to my new adventure.

Cheers,

Meakin
__________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -- A. Einstein
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #2
ricnak
Registered User
 
ricnak is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 934
My Dad left me the Mark VII when he passed away. Whenever I have had questions about the camera I have started here: http://www.mppusers.com/.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #3
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,795
Don't know about the MPP in particular, but the type 100 Polaroid backs for the currently still available 3¼ × 4¼" pack film all seem to have a flexible slider pulled from below - which makes it rather hard to pull/push the slider in a configuration that also allows for access to the instant film. They are often restricted to landscape view even when attached via Graflok sliders, and usually cannot be used with spring loaded ground glass only type attachments (well, unless you attach the back in a dark bag).
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #4
Meakin
Registered User
 
Meakin's Avatar
 
Meakin is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 181
Thanks for the info so far, from both of you.

From what I understand - the 545 backs accepts (among others) the smaller Fuji FB3000B (3x4"/8.5x10.2cm ) film and the 550 backs accepts the larger (4x5"/10.2x12.7cm) Fuji film.

The mppusers.com site lists the 550 back as compatible with the mk.VIII, but I did read on another forum that it is too thick to fit?

Please, feel free too correct/add to any of this - I'm very new to all this polaroid/instant gratification malarkey

Thank in advance.

Cheers,

/Meakin
__________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -- A. Einstein
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #5
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meakin View Post
From what I understand - the 545 backs accepts (among others) the smaller Fuji FB3000B (3x4"/8.5x10.2cm ) film and the 550 backs accepts the larger (4x5"/10.2x12.7cm) Fuji film.
Nope. The 545 was the holder for single sheet 4x5" instant film. Polaroid were the only maker of the film and went belly-up five years ago. As the liquid component has limited shelf life, expired old stock is by now mostly dead - so these holders are useless except as a holder for the (also endangered, but at least at premium prices still available from Japan) non-instant (!!!) Fuji Quickloads.

The Polaroid 550 (or Fuji PA-45) is the 4x5 pack film holder - a bit less pointless than the former, as Fuji only stopped making 4x5 packs last year, so that some shops will still have good old stock. But as legacy users are battling for the last packs, you'll have to pay quite a premium to get any.

Unless you have the money and spirit to start into a dead medium, it will have to be a 405 - these are the appropriate holders for 3¼×4¼" (a.k.a. Type 100) pack film. Fuji still has FP100C colour and FP3000B black and white - their ISO 100 black and white film is gone, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meakin View Post
The mppusers.com site lists the 550 back as compatible with the mk.VIII, but I did read on another forum that it is too thick to fit?
Any pack film holders will only slide under generously dimensioned spring backs - the MPP as I remember it is not as tight as some other cameras, but packs might be stretching its limits. Backs can often be modified to accommodate pack holders, but YMMV as to whether that is reasonably affordable. IIRC at least the later MPP models had combined spring/Graflok backs, so you could attach the holders via the Graflok sliders after removing the ground glass.

But you might still have the mentioned issue of being unable to access the slider - the 405 type holders are rather nasty regarding that...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #6
CNNY
Registered User
 
CNNY's Avatar
 
CNNY is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York
Age: 41
Posts: 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevo View Post
The Polaroid 550 (or Fuji PA-45) is the 4x5 pack film holder - a bit less pointless than the former, as Fuji only stopped making 4x5 packs last year, so that some shops will still have good old stock. But as legacy users are battling for the last packs, you'll have to pay quite a premium to get any.

Unless you have the money and spirit to start into a dead medium, it will have to be a 405 - these are the appropriate holders for 3¼×4¼" (a.k.a. Type 100) pack film.
This explains why there has recently been a deluge of 550/PA-45s flooding ebay. Everyone is trying to get top dollar for theirs before the prices plummet.
I have been using the 405 holder with Fuji pack film in a linhof Technika(a distant cousin of the MPP). While I would prefer to be using the full 4x5 format, the reasonable prices of the Fuji packs makes it a guilt free indulgence that I really enjoy.

As for the 545 holder. They are dirt cheap now, and may (fingers crossed) in future be used again with new film:
new55project
__________________
A few loose screws short of a functioning camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #7
Meakin
Registered User
 
Meakin's Avatar
 
Meakin is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 181
Sevo et al. Thank you for taking the time to explain this for me, very helpfull.
It's all clear now (boy did I get that one mixed up in my mind!)

CNNY - let's hope the new55project actually happens (seems like it's still alive, they have a couple of job offerings on the website).

Cheers,

/Meakin
__________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -- A. Einstein
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #8
graywolf
Registered User
 
graywolf is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 418
It is a conspiracy against me. I loved 4x5 sheet Polaroid, especially the B&W stuff. I also loved 4x5 film packs, especially the even more out of date 12 exposure packs. I loved Ansco Super Hypan. I no longer am willing to say what I like now, because I am afraid they will discontinue it if they find out I like it.
__________________
Tom
www.tomrit.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:27.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.