 |
Printer recommendation please - epson r3000 or 3880 |
 |
04-01-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Printer recommendation please - epson r3000 or 3880
Hello all,
The R3000 seems to be about $650 now and the 3880 is going for $900.
The R3000 is the newer product, but the 3880 comes with much more ink.
I plan to print both color and black and white 8x10 and maybe slightly larger.
Which printer would you recommend, and why?
Thank you for your assistance!
Best regards,
David
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#2
|
|
Grain Lover
ChrisP is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Saskatoon, Sk, Canada
Posts: 405
|
Haven't tried both and I know this doesn't help much but I have a 3000 and it is fantastic, Don't know what else I could ask for in a printer except maybe to print bigger (13x19's don't look as big once they're on the wall). I would say it depends how much you plan to print each year. Bigger carts are a better deal if you're going to use them but if you won't print enough to use up all the ink than I believe they dry up over time.
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Thanks for the input Chris. How many prints do you get out of a set of cartridges on the r3000? I don't anticipate making more than 100 prints per year.
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#4
|
|
Canadian & Not A Dentist
dcsang is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 4,397
|
David,
I have the Epson 3800 - the R3000 wasn't out when I purchased the 3800 some 3 years ago now I believe - I have yet to change a cartridge and the B&W prints (and colour for that matter) are sublime. My ink is currently "low" but it's only the "photo black" and, I think, the "light light black".
If you're not printing a huge amount on a regular basis (which would prompt me to suggest the 4800/4900 series) then, as someone who's used the 3800 for some time now, I would recommend it. 13x19 comes out wonderfully on this printer.
Cheers,
Dave
__________________
I own a Leica and I am NOT a dentist (I don't even portray one on TV!!!)
I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constatine Manos
ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill
My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
|
I echo all the positive comments about the R3000. I've had mine for almost a month and have been amazed at the color prints it has turned out. I've done a few B&W, but have been concentrating on color. If you don't need bigger that 13x19, then the R3000 is a no-brainer. The only negative is the need to "manually" switch between PK and MK and the subsequent ink loss (about 1ml with each switch).
I am planning on using the Ink Supply (MIS) refillable carts with their K3 equivalent inks when the Epson carts run out.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography
David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
hanzo is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasuess
The only negative is the need to "manually" switch between PK and MK and the subsequent ink loss (about 1ml with each switch).
|
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch
But I like my R3000... so far 
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
shiro_kuro is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hawaii/Japan
Posts: 397
|
I have the 3880 and print out of Lightroom .The results are stunning . This is my first printer , it's amazing how easy it is to get satisfying results out Lightroom without much fuss ....
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
|
I'd go a canon 9000/9500 instead of the Epson due to repeated bad experiences with every single epson product I've ever owned.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch
But I like my R3000... so far 
|
Ouch, that is over 10% of the ink!
Under what circumstances does one have to make the switch one way or the other?
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiro_kuro
I have the 3880 and print out of Lightroom .The results are stunning . This is my first printer , it's amazing how easy it is to get satisfying results out Lightroom without much fuss ....
|
That is good to know. I have lightroom 3, but am likely upgrading to lightroom 4 in the near future.  Thanks.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg
I'd go a canon 9000/9500 instead of the Epson due to repeated bad experiences with every single epson product I've ever owned.
|
Care to elaborate?
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch
But I like my R3000... so far 
|
Yeah, forgot that direction ;-) Which explains why my PK cart is really low, probably too low to make another switch without a new cart. But, to be fair, I have made the switch several times since getting the printer while trying out various papers I've had on hand. Should have thought ahead and planned those paper test a little better.
Ditto, though - I love this printer, for both color and B&W and will be ditching my Epson C88 with CFS set and EZ inkset.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography
David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
hanzo is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott
Ouch, that is over 10% of the ink!
Under what circumstances does one have to make the switch one way or the other?
|
Its more than an ouch 
Well, basically it depends on your choice of paper. For matte paper use matte black, and glossy paper photo black.
So you need to group your prints by paper type.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo
Its more than an ouch 
Well, basically it depends on your choice of paper. For matte paper use matte black, and glossy paper photo black.
So you need to group your prints by paper type.
|
I'll stick to matte. Not too big a fan of glossy stuff.
Definitely more than an ouch.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#15
|
|
coco frío
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
|
I have owned maybe a dozen inkjet printers, probably more. Used heavily. The Epson 3880 is simply the best one I've ever worked with, MUCH better than any of the other Epsons and FAR FAR better than any of the Canons, which tended to clog up a lot more. The 3880 is a remarkable printer that not only produces stunning results but lets you change the ink cartridge mid-print! Currently, I have a 3880 in my studio and two more of them for my students.
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#16
|
|
genius and moron
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
|
I too love the 3880, but have not used the R3000. Inks do last and last, I print a fair bit for various people and have only changed 3 cartridges over about 2 years. Likely 50% of the prints I've done (numbers not square inches) are 17x22"- I've gone through at least 150 sheets of that paper.
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,585
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott
Hello all,
The R3000 seems to be about $650 now and the 3880 is going for $900.
The R3000 is the newer product, but the 3880 comes with much more ink.
I plan to print both color and black and white 8x10 and maybe slightly larger.
Which printer would you recommend, and why?
Thank you for your assistance!
Best regards,
David
|
David, where are you seeing those prices? I'm in the market also.
Thanks!!
__________________
Raymond
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#18
|
|
nobody special
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
|
Try Epson.com if in the US. Their current price for new 3000 is $650 with free shipping. $999 for refurbished (good as a new one) 3880.
I have always bought direct from Epson. I buy a refurbished unit when available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray*j*gun
David, where are you seeing those prices? I'm in the market also.
Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,585
|
Thanks Bob!
__________________
Raymond
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels
Try Epson.com if in the US. Their current price for new 3000 is $650 with free shipping. $999 for refurbished (good as a new one) 3880.
I have always bought direct from Epson. I buy a refurbished unit when available.
|
Ordered mine directly from epson.com and received it in less than a week as I recall. It's $650 after the $200 mail-in rebate and I'm still waiting for mine, but it's only been a few weeks since I sent it in.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography
David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-03-2012
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott
Care to elaborate?
|
Epson r1800 and r1900 that clogged heads, were difficult to get a good print out of, built like crap (imo) and just generally found the design and function to be tacky. Then I had a v600 scanner that developed a purple line through every single scan I made with it. Contacted epson and they said it was dust on the flatbed, and was normal - within spec. Wouldn't help unless I paid for a service. I cleaned it in every way imaginable and could never get rid of that stupid line. If you look up 'epson line through scans' on google you'll find thousands of people with the same problem - they just keep making scanners that do this.
I bought a $100 canon ipf4850 which is a crappy cheap inkjet and it's better designed than both the epsons I had despite being 1/10th the price. Not only that, but color prints out of it are nearly perfect straight out of the box, and b&w are similar in quality, despite the obvious defect in features. The 9500 MKII printer in particular is designed and built really nicely IMO - much nicer than my r1900.
Also I used to work for a large printer/photocopier sales and service place in QLD - the canon commercial graphics printers and copiers (20K-50K each) were incredibly good machines - much better than most of the competition.
|
|
|
|
 |
04-03-2012
|
#22
|
|
Personal Photography
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,568
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito
I have owned maybe a dozen inkjet printers, probably more. Used heavily. The Epson 3880 is simply the best one I've ever worked with, MUCH better than any of the other Epsons and FAR FAR better than any of the Canons, which tended to clog up a lot more. The 3880 is a remarkable printer that not only produces stunning results but lets you change the ink cartridge mid-print! Currently, I have a 3880 in my studio and two more of them for my students.
|
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better" 
Just wondering...
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#23
|
|
nobody special
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasuess
Ordered mine directly from epson.com and received it in less than a week as I recall. It's $650 after the $200 mail-in rebate and I'm still waiting for mine, but it's only been a few weeks since I sent it in.
|
Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#24
|
|
nobody special
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better" 
Just wondering...
|
To me, my Epson printers give me great prints exactly as I though they were going to look and no problems with the printer. I have not had a clogged nozzle in the six years I have been using Epson 2400s.
I know that others have their brand favorites and I certainly would not try to convince them they are wrong.
|
|
|
|
04-03-2012
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels
Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
|
How quickly things change. I ordered my R3000 barely a month ago and it was $849 with a $200 mail-in rebate. Just checked and as you said, it's now $649 straight up with no rebate. And still free shipping!! And it's a fabulous printer to boot...
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography
David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:43. |
|
|