Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Digital Printers / Inks / Papers etc

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Printer recommendation please - epson r3000 or 3880
Old 04-01-2012   #1
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Printer recommendation please - epson r3000 or 3880

Hello all,

The R3000 seems to be about $650 now and the 3880 is going for $900.

The R3000 is the newer product, but the 3880 comes with much more ink.

I plan to print both color and black and white 8x10 and maybe slightly larger.

Which printer would you recommend, and why?

Thank you for your assistance!

Best regards,

David
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #2
ChrisP
Grain Lover
 
ChrisP's Avatar
 
ChrisP is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Saskatoon, Sk, Canada
Posts: 405
Haven't tried both and I know this doesn't help much but I have a 3000 and it is fantastic, Don't know what else I could ask for in a printer except maybe to print bigger (13x19's don't look as big once they're on the wall). I would say it depends how much you plan to print each year. Bigger carts are a better deal if you're going to use them but if you won't print enough to use up all the ink than I believe they dry up over time.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #3
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Thanks for the input Chris. How many prints do you get out of a set of cartridges on the r3000? I don't anticipate making more than 100 prints per year.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #4
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
 
dcsang's Avatar
 
dcsang is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 4,397
David,

I have the Epson 3800 - the R3000 wasn't out when I purchased the 3800 some 3 years ago now I believe - I have yet to change a cartridge and the B&W prints (and colour for that matter) are sublime. My ink is currently "low" but it's only the "photo black" and, I think, the "light light black".

If you're not printing a huge amount on a regular basis (which would prompt me to suggest the 4800/4900 series) then, as someone who's used the 3800 for some time now, I would recommend it. 13x19 comes out wonderfully on this printer.

Cheers,
Dave
__________________
I own a Leica and I am NOT a dentist (I don't even portray one on TV!!!)

I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constatine Manos

ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill

My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #5
dasuess
Registered User
 
dasuess's Avatar
 
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
I echo all the positive comments about the R3000. I've had mine for almost a month and have been amazed at the color prints it has turned out. I've done a few B&W, but have been concentrating on color. If you don't need bigger that 13x19, then the R3000 is a no-brainer. The only negative is the need to "manually" switch between PK and MK and the subsequent ink loss (about 1ml with each switch).

I am planning on using the Ink Supply (MIS) refillable carts with their K3 equivalent inks when the Epson carts run out.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography

David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #6
hanzo
Registered User
 
hanzo is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasuess View Post
The only negative is the need to "manually" switch between PK and MK and the subsequent ink loss (about 1ml with each switch).
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch

But I like my R3000... so far
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #7
shiro_kuro
Registered User
 
shiro_kuro's Avatar
 
shiro_kuro is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hawaii/Japan
Posts: 397
I have the 3880 and print out of Lightroom .The results are stunning . This is my first printer , it's amazing how easy it is to get satisfying results out Lightroom without much fuss ....
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #8
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
I'd go a canon 9000/9500 instead of the Epson due to repeated bad experiences with every single epson product I've ever owned.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #9
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo View Post
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch

But I like my R3000... so far
Ouch, that is over 10% of the ink!

Under what circumstances does one have to make the switch one way or the other?
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #10
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiro_kuro View Post
I have the 3880 and print out of Lightroom .The results are stunning . This is my first printer , it's amazing how easy it is to get satisfying results out Lightroom without much fuss ....
That is good to know. I have lightroom 3, but am likely upgrading to lightroom 4 in the near future. Thanks.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #11
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
I'd go a canon 9000/9500 instead of the Epson due to repeated bad experiences with every single epson product I've ever owned.
Care to elaborate?
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #12
dasuess
Registered User
 
dasuess's Avatar
 
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo View Post
Its only from photo black to matte.. the other way around consumes 3 ml... ouch

But I like my R3000... so far
Yeah, forgot that direction ;-) Which explains why my PK cart is really low, probably too low to make another switch without a new cart. But, to be fair, I have made the switch several times since getting the printer while trying out various papers I've had on hand. Should have thought ahead and planned those paper test a little better.

Ditto, though - I love this printer, for both color and B&W and will be ditching my Epson C88 with CFS set and EZ inkset.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography

David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #13
hanzo
Registered User
 
hanzo is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott View Post
Ouch, that is over 10% of the ink!

Under what circumstances does one have to make the switch one way or the other?
Its more than an ouch
Well, basically it depends on your choice of paper. For matte paper use matte black, and glossy paper photo black.
So you need to group your prints by paper type.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #14
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzo View Post
Its more than an ouch
Well, basically it depends on your choice of paper. For matte paper use matte black, and glossy paper photo black.
So you need to group your prints by paper type.
I'll stick to matte. Not too big a fan of glossy stuff.

Definitely more than an ouch.
__________________
My Website - Rendered In Silver

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #15
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
I have owned maybe a dozen inkjet printers, probably more. Used heavily. The Epson 3880 is simply the best one I've ever worked with, MUCH better than any of the other Epsons and FAR FAR better than any of the Canons, which tended to clog up a lot more. The 3880 is a remarkable printer that not only produces stunning results but lets you change the ink cartridge mid-print! Currently, I have a 3880 in my studio and two more of them for my students.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #16
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
I too love the 3880, but have not used the R3000. Inks do last and last, I print a fair bit for various people and have only changed 3 cartridges over about 2 years. Likely 50% of the prints I've done (numbers not square inches) are 17x22"- I've gone through at least 150 sheets of that paper.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #17
ray*j*gun
Registered User
 
ray*j*gun's Avatar
 
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott View Post
Hello all,

The R3000 seems to be about $650 now and the 3880 is going for $900.

The R3000 is the newer product, but the 3880 comes with much more ink.

I plan to print both color and black and white 8x10 and maybe slightly larger.

Which printer would you recommend, and why?



Thank you for your assistance!

Best regards,

David
David, where are you seeing those prices? I'm in the market also.

Thanks!!
__________________
Raymond
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #18
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
Try Epson.com if in the US. Their current price for new 3000 is $650 with free shipping. $999 for refurbished (good as a new one) 3880.

I have always bought direct from Epson. I buy a refurbished unit when available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ray*j*gun View Post
David, where are you seeing those prices? I'm in the market also.

Thanks!!
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #19
ray*j*gun
Registered User
 
ray*j*gun's Avatar
 
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 1,585
Thanks Bob!
__________________
Raymond
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #20
dasuess
Registered User
 
dasuess's Avatar
 
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels View Post
Try Epson.com if in the US. Their current price for new 3000 is $650 with free shipping. $999 for refurbished (good as a new one) 3880.

I have always bought direct from Epson. I buy a refurbished unit when available.
Ordered mine directly from epson.com and received it in less than a week as I recall. It's $650 after the $200 mail-in rebate and I'm still waiting for mine, but it's only been a few weeks since I sent it in.
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography

David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #21
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by david.elliott View Post
Care to elaborate?
Epson r1800 and r1900 that clogged heads, were difficult to get a good print out of, built like crap (imo) and just generally found the design and function to be tacky. Then I had a v600 scanner that developed a purple line through every single scan I made with it. Contacted epson and they said it was dust on the flatbed, and was normal - within spec. Wouldn't help unless I paid for a service. I cleaned it in every way imaginable and could never get rid of that stupid line. If you look up 'epson line through scans' on google you'll find thousands of people with the same problem - they just keep making scanners that do this.

I bought a $100 canon ipf4850 which is a crappy cheap inkjet and it's better designed than both the epsons I had despite being 1/10th the price. Not only that, but color prints out of it are nearly perfect straight out of the box, and b&w are similar in quality, despite the obvious defect in features. The 9500 MKII printer in particular is designed and built really nicely IMO - much nicer than my r1900.

Also I used to work for a large printer/photocopier sales and service place in QLD - the canon commercial graphics printers and copiers (20K-50K each) were incredibly good machines - much better than most of the competition.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #22
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito View Post
I have owned maybe a dozen inkjet printers, probably more. Used heavily. The Epson 3880 is simply the best one I've ever worked with, MUCH better than any of the other Epsons and FAR FAR better than any of the Canons, which tended to clog up a lot more. The 3880 is a remarkable printer that not only produces stunning results but lets you change the ink cartridge mid-print! Currently, I have a 3880 in my studio and two more of them for my students.
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better"
Just wondering...
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #23
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasuess View Post
Ordered mine directly from epson.com and received it in less than a week as I recall. It's $650 after the $200 mail-in rebate and I'm still waiting for mine, but it's only been a few weeks since I sent it in.
Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #24
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better"
Just wondering...
To me, my Epson printers give me great prints exactly as I though they were going to look and no problems with the printer. I have not had a clogged nozzle in the six years I have been using Epson 2400s.

I know that others have their brand favorites and I certainly would not try to convince them they are wrong.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #25
dasuess
Registered User
 
dasuess's Avatar
 
dasuess is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 61
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels View Post
Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
How quickly things change. I ordered my R3000 barely a month ago and it was $849 with a $200 mail-in rebate. Just checked and as you said, it's now $649 straight up with no rebate. And still free shipping!! And it's a fabulous printer to boot...
__________________
"You can't count on others to think or see for you." David Vestal, The Craft of Photography

David A. Suess
EM-5: 12/f2, 17/f1.8, 45/f1.8
EP-2: 17/f2.8
Nikon F: 35/f2, 55/f3.5 Micro, 85/f1.8
http://DavidSuessImages.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.