Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Fixed Lens Advanced Compacts > Fuji X Series > X100

X100 X100 including operation & reviews!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 03-21-2012   #51
Gid
Registered User
 
Gid's Avatar
 
Gid is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 1,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
now i really want the x100 again...again!
Its a good time to buy Joe and you know you really want one

It took me a long time to gel with mine, but I wouldn't part with it now. Love it.
__________________
My Gallery

My Top Ten

Gid
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #52
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
 
Jamie Pillers's Avatar
 
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 2,866
Its actually only a $200 premium, if you count the value of the included case, hood, and filter adapter. :-)
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #53
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,702
i'd have to sell some things to get another one...and i would like the black version to boot!

when i was facilitating self help and problem solving groups, i discovered that many people often refused what could be a very simple solution for their problems because they refused to believe that their problems could be solved easily, that their lives were much too complicated for simple solutions.

i find myself and cameras to be the same...how can a simple fixed lens camera possibly be the solution to my camera problems...?
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #54
Snacks
Registered User
 
Snacks is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ohio (long way from home)
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by KM-25 View Post
They just updated the firmware again and this time it is a *HUGE* improvement overall.
They moved Auto ISO into the ISO section! This is brilliant!
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #55
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,702
i just had a horrible, horrible thought!!!

what if fuji upgrades the x100?
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #56
zvos1
Registered User
 
zvos1's Avatar
 
zvos1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Pillers View Post
Its actually only a $200 premium, if you count the value of the included case, hood, and filter adapter. :-)
Here in Australia, black version is $1,599 which is $400 more than silver one, someone said that accessories are worth around $270 so the premium is even less than $200.

The quality of the black finish on the camera is superb, also I love the leather case that comes with it, it is just beautiful.
__________________
Of course it's all luck. - HCB

M3 + 50 cron IV
M6 + 28 elmarit IV
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #57
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
i just had a horrible, horrible thought!!!

what if fuji upgrades the x100?
That would be great!!!
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #58
FA Limited
convo killer
 
FA Limited is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snacks View Post
They moved Auto ISO into the ISO section! This is brilliant!
but not in the ISO Fn button menu. Fuji always leaves us wanting more
that being said, i've had mines for a few weeks and just upgraded, reading back at all the complaints from last summer, i can't see why people are complaining so much. this new firmware has sorted out most of the wackiness.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #59
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,928
Funny, all three of my favorite camera have been mentioned in this thread! The M2, the M4-P and the X100! (The X10 is a close runner-up for me and the M8 would be a favorite if it was still usable above ISO 320, which mine isn't.)

The X100 is just brilliant and it slips into my purse, so I think I'm going to have to go with Jamie and call it the best (on points) camera I've had in forty-some years of being a photographer.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #60
Spyro
Registered User
 
Spyro is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Oz
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by FA Limited View Post
but not in the ISO Fn button menu.
but that wouldnt make sense. The idea is to be able to select both an ISO value and auto ISO at the same time. This way the camera will try to keep your preferred ISO value and, if thats not possible with your other exposure settings, increase ISO automatically.

Unless it had a sub-menu in the FN menu... that would work I guess.
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #61
FA Limited
convo killer
 
FA Limited is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spyro View Post
but that wouldnt make sense. The idea is to be able to select both an ISO value and auto ISO at the same time. This way the camera will try to keep your preferred ISO value and, if thats not possible with your other exposure settings, increase ISO automatically.

Unless it had a sub-menu in the FN menu... that would work I guess.
my Auto ISO is a set and forget kinda deal unless i need more than ISO 1600. i was hoping in the Fn menu either i pick a manual ISO or use the Auto ISO. for me, configuring the Auto ISO can stay where it was.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #62
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
now i really want the x100 again...again!

And this is the danger of this place (RFF) because I find myself thinking the same thing as I read through this thread!

This thread needs an ignore option!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #63
zvos1
Registered User
 
zvos1's Avatar
 
zvos1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
And this is the danger of this place (RFF) because I find myself thinking the same thing as I read through this thread!

This thread needs an ignore option!
Keith, just think of how much money you'd save over M9 that you were thinking about!! In the end it is all about the savings not the spending ha,ha,ha.
I remember the reasons you passed the camera onto paulfish, I think you tried using the camera for what it wasn't designed for (dark indoors with moving subjects). x100 definitely has it's quirks but I never liked any digital camera as much. My x100 really feels like a film camera once I put it in its leather case, disable replay and use OVF only.
__________________
Of course it's all luck. - HCB

M3 + 50 cron IV
M6 + 28 elmarit IV
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #64
drec
Rangeflounder
 
drec is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 77
I had an X100 for a month or so. 35mm FOV is not my thing, 50 is... so I went the GXR route with 50 and M modules.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=821'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #65
Snacks
Registered User
 
Snacks is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ohio (long way from home)
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by FA Limited View Post
but not in the ISO Fn button menu. Fuji always leaves us wanting more
that being said, i've had mines for a few weeks and just upgraded, reading back at all the complaints from last summer, i can't see why people are complaining so much. this new firmware has sorted out most of the wackiness.
It would have been nice if they'd fixed the problems first rather than rushing the camera out. The firmware changes have greatly improved the camera at every step. I'm pleased, though, that Fuji has stuck with it and kept upgrading the firmware in response to feedback.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #66
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snacks View Post
It would have been nice if they'd fixed the problems first rather than rushing the camera out. The firmware changes have greatly improved the camera at every step. I'm pleased, though, that Fuji has stuck with it and kept upgrading the firmware in response to feedback.

In a pefect world yes!

Though I think Fuji have probably really needed that feedback from owners to impliment these changes/improvements via firmware upgrades. Hats off to them IMO.
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2012   #67
RObert Budding
Registered User
 
RObert Budding is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,199
My Nikon D700 is, hands down, the best camera that I've ever used. I still love film, but nice images at ISO 6400 makes it easy to capture my sons playing basketball in dimly lit gyms.
__________________
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true."
~Robert Wilensky

"He could be right, he could be wrong. I think he's wrong but he says it in such a sincere way. You have to think he thinks he's right."
~ Bob Dylan
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-22-2012   #68
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
 
Jamie Pillers's Avatar
 
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 2,866
The pictures you've been posting in the X100 images thread certainly show you're having a lot of fun with it! :-)
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-22-2012   #69
naruto
GASitis.. finally cured?
 
naruto's Avatar
 
naruto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 629
That does it. I am getting one.... a friend has been holding one for me for weeks now...
__________________
~ash
-------

me @ Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2012   #70
NLewis
Registered User
 
NLewis is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveisbest View Post
There are only two things about the X100 I really don't like. The slow as hell manual focus ring and the battery life. Everything else is just about perfect.
I don't know why everyone whines about the manual focus. Just like the Nikon AF-S lenses, which also have a manual focus ring on autofocus lenses, they are not intended as the primary focusing system. It is an adjunct to autofocus for:

a) zone/hyperfocal focusing;
b) correcting AF focus mistakes;
c) setting focus when AF is having trouble, sometimes in macro for example or perhaps low light.

Nobody complains about the Nikon manual focus rings. And, nobody tries to use them as the primary focus method. Bring extra batteries, I bought a set of two on eBay for $10 including shipping. Can you believe this whining? Now go take pictures.
  Reply With Quote

Steve Anchell says what we've been saying...
Old 03-23-2012   #71
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
 
Jamie Pillers's Avatar
 
Jamie Pillers is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 2,866
Steve Anchell says what we've been saying...

Check out the latest issue of Photo Technique Magazine; there's a nice article by Steve Anchell describing his experience using the X100 for street photography in Cuba:

http://www.phototechmag.com/index.ph.../steve-anchell

One of his comments parallels the comments here - (roughly) "... turn off all the bells and whistles..." Use the camera like you'd use a film camera for street photography.
__________________
Go outside and talk to someone today.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #72
tbhv55
Registered User
 
tbhv55 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLewis View Post
I don't know why everyone whines about the manual focus. Just like the Nikon AF-S lenses, which also have a manual focus ring on autofocus lenses, they are not intended as the primary focusing system. It is an adjunct to autofocus for:

a) zone/hyperfocal focusing;
b) correcting AF focus mistakes;
c) setting focus when AF is having trouble, sometimes in macro for example or perhaps low light.

Nobody complains about the Nikon manual focus rings. And, nobody tries to use them as the primary focus method. Bring extra batteries, I bought a set of two on eBay for $10 including shipping. Can you believe this whining? Now go take pictures.
Very well said...
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #73
Bike Tourist
Registered User
 
Bike Tourist's Avatar
 
Bike Tourist is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central California
Age: 77
Posts: 1,485
I came late to the party, only having had my X100 for about a month. I was going to use it for personal work and keep using the D7000 for microstock. Unfortunately (or fortunately) the X100 images keep getting accepted by the agencies so that the poor Nikon is not getting out much. Maybe the D7000 will be traded for an X-Pro 1 sometime later this year. That camera should have the X100's advantages, plus interchangable lenses and even zooms and telephotos can be used with the EVF.
__________________
Dick Thornton

Stock Portfolio:
http://www.shutterstock.com/g/biketourist
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #74
daveisbest
Registered User
 
daveisbest is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLewis View Post
I don't know why everyone whines about the manual focus. Just like the Nikon AF-S lenses, which also have a manual focus ring on autofocus lenses, they are not intended as the primary focusing system. It is an adjunct to autofocus for:

a) zone/hyperfocal focusing;
b) correcting AF focus mistakes;
c) setting focus when AF is having trouble, sometimes in macro for example or perhaps low light.

Nobody complains about the Nikon manual focus rings. And, nobody tries to use them as the primary focus method. Bring extra batteries, I bought a set of two on eBay for $10 including shipping. Can you believe this whining? Now go take pictures.
Thankfully the good folks at Fuji don't share your abysmal attitude and greatly improved the manual focusing in the latest firmware update.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #75
Archiver
Registered User
 
Archiver is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 467
I've been using the X100 for the past few weeks as a general carry around camera and I find it fast and mostly reliable. I am working around the quirks and I can see why many people call it the best camera they have used.

My journey into digital photography started with the Canon S45, which had a 35/2.8 eq. lens, and I can say that I would have LOVED this camera if I had it back then! It is ticks the boxes for speed, silence, autofocus, image quality, movie mode, good looks, good handling and usable OVF. I have loads of other cameras but none of them give this combination of values which makes it unique in my book.
__________________
~Loving Every Image Captured Always~
Archiver on flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:34.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.