| Nikon RF This forum is dedicated to Nikon Rangefinders: the Nikon One, Nikon M, Nikon S, Nikon S2, Nikon SP, Nikon S3, Nikon S4, and Nikon S3M, Nikon S3 2000, Nikon SP 2005. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in Nikon Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2S. |
02-26-2012
|
#2
|
|
Daktari
srtiwari is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vero Beach, Florida
Posts: 932
|
The stones in front of the track seem just a tad sharper with the 1.8.
__________________
Subhash
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
|
With a little higher contrast and warmer color rendition, IMHO.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
rbsinto is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada Thornhill is a suburb of Toronto
Posts: 1,126
|
Unsure what your point is.
I could understand the comparison if the lenses were interchangeable from system to system. But as they aren't, what difference does it make?
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,870
|
Kevin,
thanks for posting. I was looking at the Nikkor 35/1.8 or the Canon 35/1.5 on my m body. And the price range is roughly the same, the 1.5 being a tad more "collectible" than the 1.8. But you images prove that the Nikkor is an excellent performer.
raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#6
|
|
Think Different
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 1,905
|
Both pics look alike to me.
Why shoot pics at F5.6 where most lenses look alike? Why not shoot some pictures at F1.5 and F1.8?
Jim B.
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#7
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbsinto
Unsure what your point is.
I could understand the comparison if the lenses were interchangeable from system to system. But as they aren't, what difference does it make?
|
I can only guess, but some people have multiple systems, and if they want to buy yet another exotic 35mm lens, will it be a 35/1.8 Nikon or a 35/1.5 ....
that's all.
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
t6un is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
Unsure what your point is.
I could understand the comparison if the lenses were interchangeable from system to system. But as they aren't, what difference does it make?
|
Quote:
|
Nikkor 35mm f1.8 and Canon 35mm f1.5 all in Leica screw mount on R-D1s.
|
Leica screw mount is one, more or less interchangeable, system, issn't it?
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#9
|
|
所謂的攝影,就是人生。
KEVIN-XU 愛 forever is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Shanghai China , New Jersey America
Age: 21
Posts: 238
|
Thanks for all your guys comments here!
I am sorry that I only post two test shots here and without any conclusion. Actually this is the first time that I try to do some comparison among some lenses. Yes,I try to shoot some pictures at f1.8 and f1.5. But the light is too strong outside and I have limited time to do this comparison. So I cannot completely finish this job. I will upload more pictures in the next week.
Wish you guys can give me some advice about how to test different lenses.
Cheers,
Kevin
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Nokton48 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,503
|
I would say to shoot comparisons wide-open, use a tripod or other lockdown method and crank the ISO down close to low as it will go.
Great effort and Thanks!
|
|
|
|
02-26-2012
|
#11
|
|
所謂的攝影,就是人生。
KEVIN-XU 愛 forever is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Shanghai China , New Jersey America
Age: 21
Posts: 238
|
Thanks Nokton48!
Yeah. I also find that the Nikkor shot is a little higher. I will try to keep them in the same position next time.
Wide open! Bokeh! Yes,I will also show them next time.
Cheers,
Kevin
|
|
|
|
02-27-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is online now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,905
|
Very helpful test. As others said, it would be interesting to see both lenses also wide open, and both lenses at f/2.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04. |
|
|