02-19-2012
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
nonot is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Age: 33
Posts: 259
|
I'd be hard pressed to choose between a Contax T3 and a Ricoh GR1v
Digital, I just use my iphone.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
Greyscale is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Age: 53
Posts: 2,196
|
Nikon AF600
Samsung AF Mini
Konica Lexio 70
all are very good.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#28
|
|
genius and moron
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,184
|
Another vote for the Contax T3. Arguably the best lens ever put in a compact camera, and it is a very tiny thing in the hand. Smaller than a Rollei 35, right about as big as a Stylus Epic (going from memory there- tho the Stylus is certainly thinner). I've had one with me every time I've worn my coat this winter and like this camera more with every roll of film I run and every print I make. Excellent meter, great simple controls when you want them that can be operated with thin gloves on, and image quality that certainly rivals Leica glass in prints at nice big sizes. This is a camera I'm pretty sure I'll use for the rest of my life- even if I have to replace it a few times over.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 921
|
Another vote for the GRD IV :
The tonality from new jpeg engine with DR expansion is so good I rarely use DNG raw anymore.
Good up to ISO 800 indoors and helped along with IS and 3 axis level indicators.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
malthusiantrap is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 71
|
Among the cameras I own, I like these compacts the best:
1. Konica Big Mini - very stylish (I have the champagne version) and excellent lens, a bit slow start up time though.
2. Olympus Stylus Epic - fast lens and great performance
3. Olympus XA - Aperture priority, +1.5 exposure comp, great lens and an option for rangefinder/scale focusing. What's not to like?
Digital:
I tried an LX5 but the form factor and controls didn't really mesh with my needs so I got a Ricoh GRD III. That Ricoh is a joy to use and the images are just fantastic.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
Gary Sandhu is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 364
|
Film: minolta tc-1
I like it better than the contax t3 because of the wider lens and better controls.
Digital: canon s95 ( I don't have the s100)
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#32
|
|
Always looking
River Dog is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 630
|
My current choices are:
Olympus XA
Canon S95
__________________
If I can find it, buy it and lift it, I'll shoot it

|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
OlliL is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 26
Posts: 697
|
Film: I really love (and missed my) Pentax Espio Mini
Just bought another one.
Digital: Ricoh GRD
I don't need a zoom and really like the intuitive controls.
__________________
Kind regards,
Oliver
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
agour is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 125
|
olympus xa
light, cheap, fast lens
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
walnuts is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
|
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
Tessar. is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 73
|
Like the White Angel, the Vivitar Ultra Wide and Slim, but the rewind crank broke off on mine. I liked that I'd carried it with my other cameras so when I finished a film it had about 2 years worth of pics from lots of different locations. Also my wife's Rollei AF35M, or the original Olympus Pen
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
jpressman is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 59
Posts: 19
|
I like my S95. I liked my LX3 a lot, but someone swiped it and I decided to switch to Canon to see how it is. The LX3 had nicer b&w files IMHO.
__________________
Jeff
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
maitani is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 433
|
real pocketable
tc-1
xa + xa4
gr-1
pocketable
28ti nikon
contax t2
not so pocketable
hexar af
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
TechCron is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
|
i vote for Contax T3 
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
Corto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NE PA
Posts: 433
|
Film:
Oly Stylus Infinity , good lens and great handshape, protected lens and fits anywhere.
Digital:
Canon Powershot SD800IS.
Very small, Userfriendly and good lens. Viewfinder.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
ajuk is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 88
|
I like the Stylus Epic (MJUII) It would seem Olympus are the only company to make plastic bodied cameras aimed at the P&S crowed to have an enthusiast following.
I recently Bought an MJUII for £1 then sold it for £25, then my other one broke, so I only had one, I wasn't going to buy another one but I managed to get one in new condition for £36.
__________________
Canonet QL-17 GIII, Olympus 35RD, Olympus MJUII x2, Olympus MJU, Olympus XA2.
Nikon F80 and F90x, 4 OM bodies. Pentax ME Super and K100D, Bronica ETRs.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
GBR66 is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 67
|
For film Olympus XA...just found my wife's 20 year old (?) version in a cupboard with a film to be developed.....however I'd go digital everytime now for an everyday carry and I love my canon s95, it is tiny, fits in jeans or suit pocket, great IQ for what it is and is easy to use.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#43
|
|
yukio is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 45
|
I tend to do more public/candid shooting so I judge best based on shortest shutter lag, operational time from start-up, and ease of pre-focusing. Of the point-and-shoots I've own/owned (Contax T3, Olympus XA, Contax T, Nikon 28Ti, Yashica T4), the Contax T is the best. The XA is a close second. It's easier to load and a better value than the T, but optics pushes the T to the top.
The closest thing I have to a digital p&s would be an iphone.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
02-19-2012
|
#45
|
|
Registered User
nightfly is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,439
|
The film GR1 is just a touch slimmer than the digital version and fits in the pocket better. I have both the GR1 and the GRD 3 and prefer the GR1 both for image quality (just like film) and pocketability.
The XA is smaller but fatter but works well too. The lens tends to flare and it's not as nice overall as the GR1. Also having a rangefinder with a small dim viewfinder isn't really super great so you might as well buy an XA2 for less money.
The Contax T2 is pretty heavy and fat and I actually prefer the Tessar on the Yashica t4 to the Sonnar on the T2. The T2 has a lot more control but really for a point and shoot, I feel like they are overkill.
The Contax T1 and Minox are both tiny with nice lenses but I find the barn door lens annoying and fiddly for quick shooting.
The Rollei 35 is super fiddly and heavy. Didn't get on with it at all. People love em though.
Never tried the T3 cause they are way too expensive.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
02-19-2012
|
#46
|
|
Fluffy Marsupial
Mr_Toad is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Frisco, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 262
|
For a digital, I REALLY like the Canon Powershot G12.
Okay, so it's kind of a fatty when it comes to pocketing....but it has nifty manual dials on top, an active ZOOOOOOM Optical Viewfinder sync'ed with the 28-140mm (35mm equivalent) zoom lens (corresponding aperture of f/2.8-f/4.5), 5x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (whatever that means), the rear screen is articulated so can be closed to protect the screen (while jammed in the pocket), 10 Meg sensor, 780 video, has a long heritage of multiple prior "G" versions to work the bugs out, lots of fun imaging features in the menu, and is usually priced under $400.
Sadly, the zoom lens does not have a filter ring, but there are some great after market UV protection filters that can be applied with adhesive.
HOWEVER...you can get a larger sensor with a micro 4/3 these days...at similar prices.
I just like this G12 camera...I dunno why. (I think Canon has a smaller equivalent in the Canon S95 or something...but it doesn't have a viewfinder. I am IN to viewfinders.)
Robt.
|
|
|
|
 |
02-19-2012
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
anerjee is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 113
|
Is the Fuji X10 similar in dimensions to the XA or the GR1?
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#48
|
|
Fluffy Marsupial
Mr_Toad is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Frisco, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 262
|
The Fuji X10 is sort of pocketable...except it's bigger than the XA, and the zoom lens kinda sticks out a bit.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
useless generation is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 23
Posts: 147
|
Another vote for the Olympus Mju-II
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012
|
#50
|
|
Registered User
ajuk is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBR66
For film Olympus XA...just found my wife's 20 year old (?) version in a cupboard with a film to be developed.....however I'd go digital everytime now for an everyday carry and I love my canon s95, it is tiny, fits in jeans or suit pocket, great IQ for what it is and is easy to use.
|
I don't know how people serious about photography can be satisfied by Digicams with such tiny sensors, for me they're good for pictures on the internet though.
__________________
Canonet QL-17 GIII, Olympus 35RD, Olympus MJUII x2, Olympus MJU, Olympus XA2.
Nikon F80 and F90x, 4 OM bodies. Pentax ME Super and K100D, Bronica ETRs.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:56. |
|
|