Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Scanners / Scanner Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

OpticFilm 7600i SE Scanner vs Nikon Coolscan IV ED
Old 02-14-2012   #1
ark8012
Registered User
 
ark8012's Avatar
 
ark8012 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Shrewsbury, MA
Posts: 183
OpticFilm 7600i SE Scanner vs Nikon Coolscan IV ED

Any recommendation between two scanner?

What will be the pros and cons if I choose one over the other?
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-16-2012   #2
cabbiinc
Slightly Irregular
 
cabbiinc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 232
Unless something is wrong with the Nikon scanner I'd seriously consider it over the OpticFilm. I have an LS-2000 and the color accuracy is a notch above anything else I've used. It's also faster than anything else I've used except a 1000 dpi scanner, but then the LS-2000 is triple the resolution that was.

I have nothing against the OpticFilm scanner, but I'm just impressed by my experience with my Nikon scanner.

http://translate.google.com/translat...26prmd%3Dimvns
http://www.filmscanner.info/en/Plust...Film7600i.html

Take a look at these two links. One shows the Nikon at just over a minute and a half with IR dust removal turned on per frame. The Plustek is just over 11 minutes at roughly the same quality. What's your time worth?
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-20-2012   #3
aldobonnard
Registered User
 
aldobonnard is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 265
hi,
My advice: don't believe filmscanner.info, it's utter rubbish in the sense that everything not Nikon (that they sell) or Reflecta (that they sell too) gets a bad mark... I've got 2 KM 5400 (v1 and v2) along with a Nikon 5000ED, and the Nikon lags behind by miles, in terms of resolution, optics, colour accuracy, grainyness, digital noise compared to Minolta High End Scanners.
About your question, it depends if you intend to do BW or Colour mostly.
BW:
my experience is that Plustek scanner with Silverfast gives consistently superior scans for B&W negatives: more precise, less grainy. Real resolution is 3600dpi but needs to scan at 7200dpi (takes time). The nikon IV will be faster, can scan strips of 6 but with a resolution of 2600dpi or less. The plustek works 1 by 1, manual process.
To be honest, I kind of regret giving away my plustek: I've never managed so good scans, I suppose this is thanks to Silverfast.
Colour:
ICE matters, and then the Nikon software works much better than Silverfast iSRD, which is even worse than Vuescan IR dust removal (yes, this is possible..). On the other hand, Silverfast is v good for negatives with the negafix database which helps achieving colour accuracy.
Other:
Focus: Nikon's advantage is that you can focus the scan optics. But I never thought the plustek was disadvantaged.
Reliability:
I had 2 Plustek scanners, from new, and both had to be returned for failed sensor. Reliability is not great, I advise taking a 2 or 3 years warranty.
OS / Service / Price:
Nikon Scan is no longer supported, nor will the Coolscan IV be repaired if it breaks.
Plustek still exists and Silverfast software supports new OS.
Price-wise, Nikon's sell for much too high prices, with respect to their real performance, imho.
Hope that helps
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:12.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.