Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras - > Micro 4/3 Cameras

Micro 4/3 Cameras This forum is for all Micro 4/3 cameras of any camera make.

View Poll Results: Are you going OM-D?
O yeah, here's my pre-order confirmation! 36 10.43%
You bet! just have to de-GAS a few gears to fund it 23 6.67%
Positively, but only when it hits street price level 65 18.84%
I don't know, I like it, but won't my APS-C buddies shun me? 50 14.49%
Heck no! I won't be caught dead with a dinky m4/3rd camera 110 31.88%
OMD? Are they coming out with a new album? 61 17.68%
Voters: 345. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-23-2012   #476
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
And we haven't even began in the earnest uh... discussing, about silver vs black

Speaking of which, I'm rather surprised that the silver seems to be as popular (maybe slightly more) than the black from the hands-on images I've seen.
Or "which case, which bag, which strap ..."
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #477
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trius View Post
Or "which case, which bag, which strap ..."
Indeed, I'm not sure any of my current bags are optimal for this new camera
For those feeling the need, there is a what strap discussion over here http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...hread=41234983
__________________
It's the weird colour scheme that freaks me. Every time you try to operate one of these weird black controls, which are labeled in black on a black background, a small black light lights up black to let you know you've done it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #478
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 40
Posts: 13,968
Finally got my hands on this camera yesterday (J&R - NYC). Smaller than I expected, nice EVF, fast AF, but something left me cold. Perhaps it just reminded me of a hipper Panasonic G series camera (which I'm not big on). No doubt though that people will be capable of great images with the camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #479
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 48
Posts: 13,941
I am relatively confident that a kraken has made off with the slow boat my EM-5 is on.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #480
FlyingLotus
Photography
 
FlyingLotus's Avatar
 
FlyingLotus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV.
Age: 22
Posts: 22
My OM-1, IMO is better than this OM-D....why? cause it's film, doesn't have a tilt screen, and is robust.

Not to offend you OM-D lovers out there...
__________________

'Black and White are the colors of photography. To me they symbolize the alternatives of hope and despair to which mankind is forever subjected'

-Robert Frank
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #481
celluloidprop
Registered User
 
celluloidprop is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingLotus View Post
My OM-1, IMO is better than this OM-D....why? cause it's film
I don't understand this impulse.

Are there people who jump onto the M2 threads just to say the M9 is better because IT'S DIGITAL NEENER NEENER?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #482
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by rover View Post
I am relatively confident that a kraken has made off with the slow boat my EM-5 is on.
My goodness, Rover, I hope you get yours soon
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

PC Mag's review of the E-M5: new Editors' Choice
Old 04-25-2012   #483
Focal Plane Circus
Registered User
 
Focal Plane Circus's Avatar
 
Focal Plane Circus is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 50
Exclamation PC Mag's review of the E-M5: new Editors' Choice

"The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is the best Micro Four Thirds camera we've tested. It's got a top-notch stabilization system, is fully weather sealed, can shoot in all types of light, and ships with a sharp and versatile kit lens. Add it all up, and you have our new Editors' Choice for high-end compact interchangeable lens cameras."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2403406,00.asp
__________________
frelwa
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #484
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 40
Posts: 13,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloidprop View Post
Are there people who jump onto the M2 threads just to say the M9 is better because IT'S DIGITAL NEENER NEENER?
Unfortunately, there are... and unfortunately, I've done the opposite until someone pointed it out and I felt lame.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #485
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 48
Posts: 13,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
My goodness, Rover, I hope you get your soon
I ordered in mid March, body only, so I have some time to wait I fear. Unless I catch that kraken. Anyone have a severed cursed head I can use?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #486
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by rover View Post
I ordered in mid March, body only, so I have some time to wait I fear. Unless I catch that kraken. Anyone have a severed cursed head I can use?
No, but I bet once you've beaten the snot out of that kraken, you can retrieve your OM-D at the bottom of the ocean and it'll still work
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #487
plummerl
Registered User
 
plummerl's Avatar
 
plummerl is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 717
So I just got back from the Coldplay concert in Seattle and tried out my OM-D (with 12-50mm). Taking a quick look, I'm not believing what the images that I shot at 3200 & 6400 ISO look like! With this being my first attempt at video, I definitely need some practice (especially in focus lock!).

Oh yeah, the concert was fantastic!

__________________
larry
My RFF Gallery
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #488
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,754
Played with the om-d + zuiko lens lineup today at michaels camera in Melbourne - they had the olympus reps there. Learned a few things:

1. I prefer the black finish - looks meaner.

2. Olympus rep confirmed 100% that the sensor is NOT made by Panasonic. He wouldn't say who it was made by, but hinted at Aptina. From looking at pictures on the back of the screen, the 'tone' and handling of contrast/highlights is completely different from the panasonic sensored m4/3 cameras IMO - seems more like a larger sensor camera which is excellent.

3. The EVF is very good, the AF is lightening, but annoying and unpredictable in multi mode - better in single center spot mode.

4. Body size is awesome - tiny and sharp/angular. Almost too small, but not quite.

5. The handgrip is AMAZING. Makes the camera feel near-perfect.

6. The 12mm lens actually looks good in silver with the black e-m5 body. Didn't expect that.

7. Shutter is very muffled and very nice sounding, and you can really feel the mechanism through the body. It's quite a pleasant sensation.

8. I found the menu/quick menu a little sluggish - thought my x100 menu navigation was snappier.

9. kit 12-50mm lens felt a bit yuck - zoom ring really grainy and weird.

10. The IS mechanism is incredible and so extremely effective. You can also see the effects through the EvF which is great.

11. The tilt screen is really nice - the way it works means it doesn't affect durability, and it isn't bulky or loose or anything.

I could possibly buy one for myself, after I get one for my dad. My x100 and the om-d with that 12mm f2 could be a pretty serious combo.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #489
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,746
Larry & Gavin: Thanks for the thoughts and impressions.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #490
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 63
Posts: 9,597
rover, it could be johnny depp has your em-5 instead of a kraken ...
__________________
i show what i see ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #491
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
Played with the om-d + zuiko lens lineup today at michaels camera in Melbourne - they had the olympus reps there. Learned a few things:

10. The IS mechanism is incredible and so extremely effective. You can also see the effects through the EvF which is great.
gavin i'm glad you had such a positive experience with the omd, i am really liking mine as i learn how to shoot it and what the optimal settings are, which really does take some time.

however i am most interested in your comment 10, as i read this in several other places as well, but i have not found that i CAN see the effect in the vf. i have no doubt there IS a very real effect, but for the life of me, turning off the IS and viewing the screen with a 135, and turning on the IS with the same lens yields no discernible difference in the 'shake' i see through the vf. it definitely makes a difference in the quality of the pictures, but i dont see any difference at all in the vf.

would you have any suggestion as to settings beyond turning on and off IS that makes the effect visible in the vf?
thanks
tony
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #492
KenRothman
Takes really bad pictures
 
KenRothman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA
Age: 43
Posts: 101
Got one!

I had put my name on a list for a silver body-only at newtonville, and surprise surprise, it came in this week.

have only had time to fondle it a bit, seems lovely. it's a birthday present so my wife is not "allowing" me to take it out yet. bday is on may 8... i don't think i'll be waiting that long, but i'll humor her for a few days (maybe until the weekend )

i've got the panny 20 and leica m and nikon f adapters (all previously used on my ep1). looking forward to it.

film is getting expensive
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #493
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,883
I couldn't vote in the poll because the options are biased towards polar extremes.

If the were a simple "don't know"...
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927

Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #494
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbelyell View Post
however i am most interested in your comment 10, as i read this in several other places as well, but i have not found that i CAN see the effect in the vf. i have no doubt there IS a very real effect, but for the life of me, turning off the IS and viewing the screen with a 135, and turning on the IS with the same lens yields no discernible difference in the 'shake' i see through the vf. it definitely makes a difference in the quality of the pictures, but i dont see any difference at all in the vf.

would you have any suggestion as to settings beyond turning on and off IS that makes the effect visible in the vf?
thanks
tony
Tony,

You should be able to see it, it definitely works. Just turn IS off, and have a look at a subject through the EVF and give the camera some really small vigorous shakes. Then turn it on and do the same thing - you should feel like the image in the EVF is almost 'floating' in an abnormally smooth way.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #495
plummerl
Registered User
 
plummerl's Avatar
 
plummerl is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 717
Talking

Anyone with Lightroom 4 and the OM-D, Adobe has released Lightroom 4.1RC2 today (http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/lightroom4-1.html). It contains the undocumented addition of the RAW converter for the OM-D! I've added some JPEG conversions from RAW into the OM-D EM-5 Pics thread (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...0&postcount=49).
__________________
larry
My RFF Gallery
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #496
FlyingLotus
Photography
 
FlyingLotus's Avatar
 
FlyingLotus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV.
Age: 22
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloidprop View Post
I don't understand this impulse.

Are there people who jump onto the M2 threads just to say the M9 is better because IT'S DIGITAL NEENER NEENER?
I have tested out the OM-D, it's not to my liking...

Furthermore i did not mean to just say "one is better than the other." Secondly if i remember correctly this was a Poll, so expect opinions from other people...
__________________

'Black and White are the colors of photography. To me they symbolize the alternatives of hope and despair to which mankind is forever subjected'

-Robert Frank
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #497
uinku
Registered User
 
uinku is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 104
^ the film and robust drum is a tired one to beat (like "it's not the camera, but the photographer"). It often doesn't add much to the discussion unless a person takes the effort back it up with specific examples.

Gavin, or other OM-D users, can you program the camera so that AF has a dedicated button (i.e. separate it from the shutter release)?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #498
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
Tony,

You should be able to see it, it definitely works. Just turn IS off, and have a look at a subject through the EVF and give the camera some really small vigorous shakes. Then turn it on and do the same thing - you should feel like the image in the EVF is almost 'floating' in an abnormally smooth way.
thanks gavin, appreciate the reply. i definitely know it works, as i can absolutely see in the results.

so from your reply, the effect kicks in when you actually 'shake' the cam to see the effect, as opposed to noting the effect on one's (or better said, 'my') normal movement while focusing. thats too bad, because in reading about it i thought it would be a big boon to focusing a tele lens, like a 135 (270). when focusing these, esp at magnification, ones (read 'my') natural movement is violently exagerated in the vf, making focusing difficult. i thought you would see the IS effect in that situation, and i dont. i turn IS on and off and theres no difference in the shaky view.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #499
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
Extra size related pics I found on the web:

vs D5000 which is one of nikons smallest DSLRs:


vs 5d mkII:


vs d700:

You know what this means: gotta get rid of the goatee and the back-flipped baseball cap. :: ducks ::
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927

Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-2012   #500
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel M.A. View Post
I couldn't vote in the poll because the options are biased towards polar extremes.

If the were a simple "don't know"...
Gabriel,

Use the one referring to OMD the music group.
That's for the ones who simply don't know or don't care (same weight in vote, in my view).
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:33.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.