Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras - > Other CSC Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 06-07-2012   #201
Shade
Registered User
 
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 439
Yeah I do wonder how does pentax fare with their sales on this model.. Will be interesting if there are many takers on it. The risk they are raking is quite huge, perhaps the Japanese market loves it? They have been known to like unusual designs..
__________________
Www.memorialucis.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2012   #202
MikeL
Go Fish
 
MikeL's Avatar
 
MikeL is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,080
Note: this is coming from someone not up to date on the cutting edge of digital cameras.. And all I have to compare it to, from an experience standpoint, is a year or two of occasional use of a Panasonic GF-1 and 20mm lens (both of which I'm still impressed with!).

I used the Pentax briefly, that a friend rented. It had a 43mm limited lens on it.

It felt chunky to grip relative to other cameras, but not too funky.
The whole thing felt very solid, but not too heavy.
Autofocus was similar to the GF-1 from what I could tell. Pretty nice.
Manual focus was really easy with the 43mm, even without the peaking effect. Sweet LCD.
Image quality with the body-lens was way better than I'd ever need.

In short, I was impressed with the lens and photos and ease of use. The body does what it needs to do. It didn't make me want to add stuff to my other cameras to make them chunky, but it wasn't a big deal either. Leica M bodies feel chunky to me when they have a half-case. My GF-1 is still chugging along for what I use it for, but if it goes kaput, I could see it as a replacement.

Around the same time I used the friends Fuji xpro-1. I can't or don't rationalize/reason out my camera preference like some, but I can say I much preferred using the Pentax with 43mm lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2012   #203
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,017
I saw one somewhere recently and it looked different to what I imagined ... it wasn't ugly.

I'm not saying I'd own one but I certainly wasn't put off by it's looks!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2012   #204
Shade
Registered User
 
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 439
They are also available in a myriad of colours dont they?
__________________
Www.memorialucis.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-25-2012   #205
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,463
I'd like to thank my fellow RFFers for disparaging and generally down rapping the Pentax K-01. You were successful in reducing the price to $346 at B&H so even though I don't do much digital, I couldn't resist the price (although it was $316 at Adorama on black Friday). Here are images 1 and 3 out of the camera:



  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2012   #206
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,463
I finally got around to using my flash unit with my K-01. I have aperture ring Pentax lenses so as I bought the camera to use it with flash, I hoped these would be useful. They were: just set the aperture to the auto thyristor aperture setting and fire away. I used manual and hit the green button before shooting when indoors. I also set for an outdoor/indoor scene by setting ambient to the outdoor, of course leaving the aperture for the auto flash:

ambient balance:



indoor:

  Reply With Quote

Old 12-22-2012   #207
majid
Fazal Majid
 
majid's Avatar
 
majid is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 400
Ugly? Apart from the yellow grip version, I don't think so. And certainly at $315 or so it's a bargain for anyone with K mount lenses.

If you want ugly, go for the Cyclops Zeiss Contarex or the original Nikon F Photomic.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-22-2012   #208
John Robertson
Registered User
 
John Robertson's Avatar
 
John Robertson is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scotland UK
Posts: 1,574
Pentax seems to have lost the plot these days, the K01, and that daft little CSC with "toy" lenses.
My MX and ME super were great cameras, but these days !!!!!!!!
Yup lost the plot, only a matter of time before they vanish with a whimper, shame really!!
__________________
Purma Plus; Bessa R2; Bessa T;Fed2; Foca Standard x 2!!; Focasport 11 ;Fed Zarya ; AKW Arette 1c; Werramatic; Leica CL; ; Horizont 202; Olympus Trip35; Leica Mini3; Ilford Advocate: The Fed 2; Purma Plus and Ilford Advocate have been with me since they were new. (that makes me old )

Also other assorted junk (Digital camera )


Flikr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/15377338@N04/
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-22-2012   #209
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 4,005
Good Lord...even the strap is ugly...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-22-2012   #210
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,945
this camera has been available now for some time, seen only one outside Internet: in a shelf of big camera store. to me, it looked just as bad in real life as the photos on the net.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2012   #211
Addy101
Registered User
 
Addy101 is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 769
I like the pictures on the net, so it is just as nice in real life?

Reading the reviews on the net it seems it is too much style over function. Not nice to hold, the screen isn'tgood enough and not small enough. The positves are image quality and good enough AF. A better grip, a (optional) EVF and better screen would make this a much better camera it seems. But then again, top of the line Nex and M4/3 cameras are just as good and much smaller.
__________________
Das Bild ist ein Modell der Wirklichkeit - Wittgenstein
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2012   #212
BardParker
Registered User
 
BardParker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 162
Do you need an adapter to mount a manual focus K-mount lens? Is there any conversion for the sensor? (50mm lens = 50mm on camera?)
If so, I might get one of these.....

Kent
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2012   #213
Addy101
Registered User
 
Addy101 is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 769
It is a K-mount camera, so you can use your manual focus lenses with all functions. However, it is APS-C, so your 50mm will have the FoV of a 75mm lens on film.
__________________
Das Bild ist ein Modell der Wirklichkeit - Wittgenstein
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2012   #214
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,945
guess nobody argues about good IQ of K01. and once shot has been taken, who cares what was used to make it? but IMO big price drops tell tale that it wont sell otherwise, and looking the thing, no wonder. it has couple passionate fans over at pentaxforums though
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2013   #215
ampguy
Registered User
 
ampguy's Avatar
 
ampguy is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,049
anyone using one of these?
__________________
My photo blog

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2013   #216
kdemas
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by ampguy View Post
anyone using one of these?
Moi. Love it. IQ is awesome.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------
Open Iris. Life, Captured.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2013   #217
tstermitz
Registered User
 
tstermitz's Avatar
 
tstermitz is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 188
Same top-rated, APS-C sensor as Nikon D7000 and Pentax K5.

It is a bit boxy in order to use the K-mount flange distance.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2013   #218
ZorkiKat
ЗоркийКат:Sharpeyed Kitty
 
ZorkiKat's Avatar
 
ZorkiKat is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lungsod Quezon, PILIPINAS/Philippines/Филиппины
Posts: 2,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
Are you sure it is just as big?
Almost as big, the about the same as a compact DSLR. Thick deep body. Not your usual flattened mirrorless CSC types.

Almost got one of these fugly Pentaces, but got a Samsung NX 200 instead. May have been one of my better decisions made.
__________________
不管黑猫白猫能抓到老鼠就是好猫。("Black Cat, White Cat, if it can catch mice, is a Good Cat"-Deng Xiaoping 邓小平 )

FED & ZORKII SURVIVAL SITE

ZorkiKat.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2013   #219
nparsons13
Registered User
 
nparsons13's Avatar
 
nparsons13 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Near Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 129
I'll bet you know someone who loves a woman who you think isn't very attractive. Would you call her fugly to his face?

It was considered cool last year--even on the Pentax forums--to try to outdo the last guy in insulting the K-01's design. But it's been nearly a year since the camera's release, and more and more photographers have fallen in love with the camera and have found once again that beauty is more than skin deep.

So continue with the trash talk if you want--just keep in mind that the more great K-01 photos are made, the more your passť bad-mouthing sounds like sour grapes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2013   #220
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,463
I actually have one and it is really a good camera: it fits my hand, it is simple compared to the DSLRs I've owned and the pictures are excellent. Basically there is very little difference between the final out put of digital so get what you want and forget about the hype.

This weekend, I never do sports, well amost never:

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2013   #221
ampguy
Registered User
 
ampguy's Avatar
 
ampguy is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,049
I think I'd like one if they go on sale again for ~$200 or so for just a body, wouldn't want yellow, or the pancake lens though.

No hurry though, since my one camera one year project is the EPL1 with AR Hexanon SLR lens.
__________________
My photo blog

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2013   #222
nparsons13
Registered User
 
nparsons13's Avatar
 
nparsons13 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Near Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 129
We may see $200 for a K-01 body eventually. A price drop to $299.95 was announced this morning. That's a tremendous bargain for such a capable camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2013   #223
kdemas
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by nparsons13 View Post
We may see $200 for a K-01 body eventually. A price drop to $299.95 was announced this morning. That's a tremendous bargain for such a capable camera.
That is an amazing deal for a camera with this IQ. Wow.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------
Open Iris. Life, Captured.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2013   #224
giellaleafapmu
Registered User
 
giellaleafapmu is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdemas View Post
That is an amazing deal for a camera with this IQ. Wow.
I got one (yellow!) a few days ago, if you consider that the DA 40mm f2.8 costs more than 250,- US$ if bought alone this is impossible to skip. The IQ is amazing and I love the face people put when I get that out of the bag: "Did he steal his kid's camera? Fisher Price camera should be only for kids...".

Ah, yep, I also found that pointless and ugly when it appeared, and AF is slowish and it has no EVF but - who cares? - photography is not always about speed and this camera is funny so now it become my unprofessional camera of choice!

GLF
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1808'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-01-2013   #225
nparsons13
Registered User
 
nparsons13's Avatar
 
nparsons13 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Near Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by giellaleafapmu View Post
AF is slowish

GLF
Install the two firmware updates, 1.01 and 1.02. The latter was released just a few days ago. The first speeds up AF a lot, and the second helps other more minor problems.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:28.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.