Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Neopan 400
Old 08-25-2004   #1
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 67
Posts: 3,225
Neopan 400

Although you can't wholly judge a film on the basis of one roll, my first experience with Neopan 400 has been extremely positive! I really like this film!

As with Tri-X I exposed it at 320 and eased back a little on development. The resulting negs (Rodinal 1:50) seem finer-grained than Tri-X and have a very pleasing and rich tonality.

If Ilford disappears, it's nice to have Neopan 400 as an alternative to HP5!

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2004   #2
bmattock
Lord of Broken Toys
 
bmattock's Avatar
 
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
I have also used Neopan 400 - I also enjoyed the creamy texture. You might also consider the Neopan 100 Acros. Different stuff.

Then there are all the revival former-eastern-block B&W films to discover and play with!

We're not down to Tri-X alone just yet.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2004   #3
Todd.Hanz
Registered User
 
Todd.Hanz's Avatar
 
Todd.Hanz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 48
Posts: 4,966
I am finding that Rodinal seems to play a big part in the richer tones I am getting, everything I have read about it and the film I have developed seem to show sharper grain though. I have used it on Scala and on Tri-X, I really like it!

Todd
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2004   #4
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,656
with all this talk about rodinal, if i ever make it back into the darkroom i'm gonna have to try some.
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2004   #5
Rich Silfver
Batteries Not Included
 
Rich Silfver is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,709
I love Fuji Neopan 400!

Do yourself a favour and try Fuji Acros 100 as well....
__________________
My favorite RF cameras right now:
Leica III (F), Leica M3 and Contax IIIa



.........................
Blog.........................Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-26-2004   #6
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 67
Posts: 3,225
Quote:
Originally posted by rsilfverberg
Do yourself a favour and try Fuji Acros 100 as well....
It's on my list of films to try!

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-26-2004   #7
Stu :)
Registered User
 
Stu :)'s Avatar
 
Stu :) is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 36
Posts: 419
Neopan is fantastic. Acros, 400, 1600, I use them all.
Rodianl 1:50 is good for Acros and 400. But I've been told that 1600 soup's up nice at 1:75, still working on that time...
One joy with Nopan is with all the different speeds they offer, they all have the same development time if you expose them at N-0. I have had one of each in tank once, 1:50 @ 20c for 13 minutes, all turned out great.

Stu
__________________
Hydrofluoric acid and multi-coated Leica glass don't mix... trust me!
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=239'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-26-2004   #8
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 67
Posts: 3,225
Stu, are you doing any darkroom work with the negatives? If so you probably want somewhat denser negs than I do.

Exposing Neopan 400 at 320 I developed for 10min at 20C and got negs that scan well. I gently invert 2 times each minute in a Patterson tank. Then there's all the variations of water all over the world...

I didn't know that the dev time for Neopan was the same for all its ISO types. That's totally cool if you do a mixed shoot and want to develop them in one tank.

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vivitar ES, Minolta Hi-Matic 7sII and Revue 400 SE Russ Rangefinder Photography Discussion 2 02-03-2005 23:50
Test: Fuji Superia X-Tra 400 Marc Jutras Rangefinder Photography Discussion 7 01-07-2005 22:08
Neopan 400 film FrankS Rangefinder Photography Discussion 6 11-29-2004 05:49
Kodak 400 UC at Walmart rover Rangefinder Photography Discussion 18 10-10-2004 09:55
Tri-X 320 vs 400 in 120 Rich Silfver Rangefinder Photography Discussion 2 10-10-2003 12:15



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:08.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.