| Fuji X Series This forum is for fans of the rangefinder retrostyled Fuji X Series of digital cameras. |
 |
February Announcement : New Interchangeable Fujifilm 'X' |
 |
10-25-2011
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,174
|
February Announcement : New Interchangeable Fujifilm 'X'
Take a look at this thread
Just for clarification... We knew this was coming and I'm assuming that February will be the announcement.. I can't imagine that it would launch in February.
Last edited by bwcolor : 10-25-2011 at 20:17.
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#2
|
|
May contain traces of nut
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
|
Are we really discussing a mobile phone snapshot of a PowerPoint slide announcing the announcement of a camera that we knew would be announced?
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#3
|
|
Street Photographer
ScottAlexander is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 50
|
Fuji would be smart to make it a full frame, or 1.3 crop camera.. if you're going to take on the Leica X1 with the X100 by name and usability, might as well go for broke.
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#4
|
|
May contain traces of nut
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottAlexander
Fuji would be smart to make it a full frame, or 1.3 crop camera.. if you're going to take on the Leica X1 with the X100 by name and usability, might as well go for broke.
|
Yeah, I guess the about three people who want to use their existing Leica lenses, as opposed to buying your new Fuji lenses, are a really useful group to cater to when deciding to make your camera three times more expensive and your lenses two times bigger because of the extra large sensor.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#5
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
Yeah, I guess the about three people who want to use their existing Leica lenses, as opposed to buying your new Fuji lenses, are a really useful group to cater to when deciding to make your camera three times more expensive and your lenses two times bigger because of the extra large sensor.
|
in a bad mood tonight?
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#6
|
|
May contain traces of nut
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
in a bad mood tonight?
|
It's morning here 
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#7
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
It's morning here 
|
ah, that's changes everything!
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#8
|
|
May contain traces of nut
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
ah, that's changes everything!
|
I knew I could count on your understanding 
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
|
|
|
|
10-25-2011
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,174
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
Yeah, I guess the about three people who want to use their existing Leica lenses, as opposed to buying your new Fuji lenses, are a really useful group to cater to when deciding to make your camera three times more expensive and your lenses two times bigger because of the extra large sensor.
|
Well, here are a few hints as to the direction another company is taking... and they make small lenses
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-25-2011
|
#10
|
|
Zoom with your feet!
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,846
|
Must say that I'm curious about how Fuji will morph the X100 into an interchangeable lens camera. Especially because of the potential parallels with the Konica Hexar to Hexar-RF transition.
The original fixed lens auto focus Hexar was so well thought out, such a marvelous integration of functions and photographic concepts that it was nothing short of perfect. Everything was tuned to that splendid 35/2 lens. On the RF, the interchangeability aspect spoilt all that.. the finder had to be multi-purpose, the tuning of functions to lens was lost, and worst, most of the brightest ideas behind the AF-Hexar were ditched. This included the aperture-preference approach in P-mode, that flash and ambient in a single shot could be made at two different apertures, automatic focus compensation for infra-red film, the list goes on and on.. Good as it is as an autoexposure rangefinder, the Hexar-RF is miles behind the original AF-Hexar, and as far as I can see spelled the end of Konica as a camera company.
One can only hope that Fuji does things differently.. Keep the good things of the X100 in, and most of all, a proprietary lens mount that allows all the same functions and integration as its predecessor.
|
|
|
|
 |
10-25-2011
|
#11
|
|
packin' light
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,865
|
Hmpf.
It's going to be DLSR-shaped again (equals pear-shaped in my POV).
Forget about it.
__________________
Cheers, Johan
Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom
Visit johanniels.com!
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
Yeah, I guess the about three people who want to use their existing Leica lenses, as opposed to buying your new Fuji lenses, are a really useful group to cater to when deciding to make your camera three times more expensive and your lenses two times bigger because of the extra large sensor.
|
Seconded.
Cheers,
R.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
btgc is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,760
|
Who is buying all those new cameras and systems? 
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
|
Even when their interchangeable lens camera comes out, I won't change from my x100 - all I need is a good 35mm f2. Everything else is just noise!
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#15
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is online now
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,767
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc
Who is buying all those new cameras and systems? 
|
... people who's x100's have just become obsolete?
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-26-2011
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
... people who's x100's have just become obsolete?
|
How is it obsolete? The x100 is special in that the sensor and lens are both perfectly tuned to one another. The viewfinder is only for the 35mm lens, and therefore is fantastic too look through - big and bright with just the right amount of space around the frame lines . Interchangeable lenses would mean that the viewfinder would be compromised - possibly just no optical finder, only an EVF. On the x100, the EVF is rubbish compared to the OVF. It would mean that a similar 35mm f2 fujinon lens would be much bigger (on the x100 the lens unit goes very far into the body - specially for that particular sensor), and possibly not as optically good.
There are more things too - more compromises that are to be made when you have interchangeable lenses. As I said before, I would still be using my x100 despite the interchangeable system, unless they can avoid all these compromises - which is doubtful.
|
|
|
|
 |
10-26-2011
|
#17
|
|
neo-romanticist
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,159
|
It won't be full frame sensor that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#18
|
|
Moderator
rover is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,862
|
I don't think I can survive another viral marketing campaign.
Personally, I refuse to buy another new camera until a manufacturer designs one that comes with a talented attractive female photographer to take my photos for me.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Gid is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 1,539
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rover
I don't think I can survive another viral marketing campaign.
Personally, I refuse to buy another new camera until a manufacturer designs one that comes with a talented attractive female photographer to take my photos for me.
|
I'd buy one of those 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-26-2011
|
#20
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is online now
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,767
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdigital
How is it obsolete? The x100 is special in that the sensor and lens are both perfectly tuned to one another. The viewfinder is only for the 35mm lens, and therefore is fantastic too look through - big and bright with just the right amount of space around the frame lines . Interchangeable lenses would mean that the viewfinder would be compromised - possibly just no optical finder, only an EVF. On the x100, the EVF is rubbish compared to the OVF. It would mean that a similar 35mm f2 fujinon lens would be much bigger (on the x100 the lens unit goes very far into the body - specially for that particular sensor), and possibly not as optically good.
There are more things too - more compromises that are to be made when you have interchangeable lenses. As I said before, I would still be using my x100 despite the interchangeable system, unless they can avoid all these compromises - which is doubtful.
|
Sorry it was a joke, a satire on marketing and the modern condition
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
10-26-2011
|
#21
|
|
Waiting on Maitani
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,841
|
I'm not sure I'd have her taking pictures ... just sayin'
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
unixrevolution is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdigital
Even when their interchangeable lens camera comes out, I won't change from my x100 - all I need is a good 35mm f2. Everything else is just noise!
|
What about a 24mm f/2 for the 35mm equivalent angle of view?
I dunno about you guys, but I find 35mm on a 35mm camera to be somewhat wonderful. Unfortunately, the only 35mm lenses I have for my 135 cameras are SLR lenses. I really need a 35 for my Leica, but I won't be buying one for at least a few months.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#23
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,776
|
I'm interested in anyone making this type of camera...because I don't think I'll ever buy another digital M again. I was insane (though happy) to do it with the M9 and I can't see myself spending that cash again.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2011
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
btgc is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit
I'm interested in anyone making this type of camera...because I don't think I'll ever buy another digital M again. I was insane (though happy) to do it with the M9 and I can't see myself spending that cash again.
|
I wonder how long digital M-models will be in use. I mean, Leica will support each model much longer than P&S and DSLR makers use to do. There must happen something to change idea of near lifetime camera - unavailability of parts or change of approach at the company (latter isn't fair considering initial price). My guess is - when parts will no longer be obtainable.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-26-2011
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
v_roma is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 459
|
I agree that the Hexar RF lost some of what made the original Hexar great and unique, most of which was inevitable when moving from a fixed AF lens camera to an interchangeable m-mount. That said, you make it sound like the Hexar RF was a terrible camera that shouldn't have been released. Some people even think that the Hexar RF is what the M7 should've been. I'm not endorsing this view (don't know enough about these cameras to do so) or trying to start another debate here, just trying to illustrate the point that the Hexar RF is not all that bad.
But my real point is that an interchangeable X camera could make a lot of sense. Particularly if they get the viewfinder right and if the sensor is an improvement over the already very, very good X100 sensor (as Fuji seems to be claiming with their allusion to FF sensor performance). Throw in a half-way decent price, and I think you have another X camera hit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvdhaar
Must say that I'm curious about how Fuji will morph the X100 into an interchangeable lens camera. Especially because of the potential parallels with the Konica Hexar to Hexar-RF transition.
The original fixed lens auto focus Hexar was so well thought out, such a marvelous integration of functions and photographic concepts that it was nothing short of perfect. Everything was tuned to that splendid 35/2 lens. On the RF, the interchangeability aspect spoilt all that.. the finder had to be multi-purpose, the tuning of functions to lens was lost, and worst, most of the brightest ideas behind the AF-Hexar were ditched. This included the aperture-preference approach in P-mode, that flash and ambient in a single shot could be made at two different apertures, automatic focus compensation for infra-red film, the list goes on and on.. Good as it is as an autoexposure rangefinder, the Hexar-RF is miles behind the original AF-Hexar, and as far as I can see spelled the end of Konica as a camera company.
One can only hope that Fuji does things differently.. Keep the good things of the X100 in, and most of all, a proprietary lens mount that allows all the same functions and integration as its predecessor.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50. |
|
|