Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Bigger than 35 RF's > 120 RF's Modern

120 RF's Modern This is a combined forum for post 1970 120 RF cameras such as Mamiya 6, Mamiya 7, Bronica 645, Fuji and others.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Wide lens for the Mamiya 7ii? Any opinions?
Old 10-25-2011   #1
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
 
bobby_novatron's Avatar
 
bobby_novatron is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: the Great White North (Canada)
Age: 43
Posts: 618
Wide lens for the Mamiya 7ii? Any opinions?

Hey everyone,

I have a M7ii body with the standard 80mm lens. I love this camera, and I would like to get a wide angle lens. I'm wondering what would be a good compliment to my 80mm.

The 45mm seems too wide for my purposes. The 50mm seems to display significant distortion in the corners ... is the 65mm a good compliment to the 80mm? Would it be an equivalent ~30mm lens in 35mm format?

Any comments would be appreciated! Thanks.

  Reply With Quote

43 or 50
Old 10-26-2011   #2
EdSawyer
Registered User
 
EdSawyer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 78
43 or 50

43 is a world-beater and the best wide-angle lens for MF, ever, I think. 50 is a close 2nd. Both are raison-d'etre for the Mamiya 7 system in general. I think the 65 is too close to the 80 to bother with that as a 2nd lens, though it is a great lens too. I'd get the 43 or 50.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-26-2011   #3
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Both the 50 and the 43 are fantastic. You can't go wrong with either. Which one you pick depends on the FOV you like (25mm vs 21mm equivalent of 35mm). The 65mm on Mamiya 7II is a mild wide and good for normal shooting.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-26-2011   #4
johnwood
Registered User
 
johnwood is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 40
The 65's too close to 80, especially given the cost of the lens. I'm not sure about significant distortion on the 50, mine seems quite nice; but, if you're against the 50, then go ahead and get the 43, which is wonderful, and crop if it's too wide.
__________________
john wood
monterey bay, ca
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #5
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
 
bobby_novatron's Avatar
 
bobby_novatron is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: the Great White North (Canada)
Age: 43
Posts: 618
Excellent advice, everyone. I also have considered that the 65mm is too close to the 80mm (despite being an excellent lens in its own right), and therefore not really worth the expense.

Now I'll have to keep an eye open for a 50mm I suppose!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #6
uhligfd
Registered User
 
uhligfd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 536
Complement, complement, man, not a compliment ...

Anyway, the 43 mm one is the best and do not be afraid of wides. You want to have a wide, so take a superwide. On 35 mm film, the 21 mm rules on the street, in the woods, in the house.... The learning curve is a bit steep, but once you get the hang of what to do with your subject matter and where to point the lens you will be miles ahead of where you would be with first shelling out for the 65 mm, then for the 50 mm ...to finally end up at the 43 mm anyway.

My two cents. Compliments to your move into wides to complement your normal 80mm lens then. And good luck!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #7
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 43
Posts: 1,682
I've Just picked up a 50mm for my 7ii, though I've not had chance to shoot it yet.

It's worth noting that the 7ii has frame lines for the 50mm bit not for the 43mm.
If you shoot street, not having to use the big viewfinder stuck on top of the camera is an advantage due to less bulk and the faster framing and focussing of using the cameras own VF.

If you don't wear glasses I dare say you could get away with using the full frame of the VF as a reasonable guide for the 43mm, however if you do wear specks (as I do) then you can just about see the 50mm frame lines.
__________________
Mamiya 7ii, Rolleiflex 3.5F, Yashica-Mat 124G, Fuji GS 645, Ricoh GXR Ricoh GR-1, Canon QL25, Zenit ES.

MY WEBSITE
Ipernity
yay!
Flickr boo!
RFF
gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #8
jasonrutter
Registered User
 
jasonrutter is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 45
I have both the 80mm and 50mm which are both wonderful lenses. I feel that the 80mm is a touch long at moments and the 50mm to be a bit too wide for some situations which leads me to believe a 65mm would be ideal compromise between them. Not to mention the price point of the 65mm is far more tempting.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #9
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobfrance View Post
It's worth noting that the 7ii has frame lines for the 50mm bit not for the 43mm.
Are you sure? I think you mixed it up with Mamiya 6 which has framelines for the 50mm. I have used the full viewfinder for the 50mm on the 7 II, but it does come with a separate viewfinder for both the 50 and the 43. Either way, they are awesome wides, some of the best in MF.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #10
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 43
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmallick View Post
Are you sure? I think you mixed it up with Mamiya 6 which has framelines for the 50mm. I have used the full viewfinder for the 50mm on the 7 II, but it does come with a separate viewfinder for both the 50 and the 43. Either way, they are awesome wides, some of the best in MF.

Fairly sure. It brings up its widest possible frame lines in the viewfinder when the lens is attached, I've checked them by comparing their FOV to the external 50mm finder that came with the lens. They are pretty close, too close to be the 65mm lines, I think, which would be the next step down. Unfortunately I don't have a 65mm lens to put on in order to be 100% certain.

What frame lines does the 50mm bring up on your camera?
__________________
Mamiya 7ii, Rolleiflex 3.5F, Yashica-Mat 124G, Fuji GS 645, Ricoh GXR Ricoh GR-1, Canon QL25, Zenit ES.

MY WEBSITE
Ipernity
yay!
Flickr boo!
RFF
gallery

Last edited by Bobfrance : 10-27-2011 at 07:18.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #11
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
The Mamiya 7II only has framelines for the 65 (widest), 80mm and 150mm. I just checked with the instruction manual just to be sure. The 65mm framelines almost fills the entire viewfinder and that is the reason many like using the 65mm lens (similar to 35mm on a Leica M 0.72x). Both the 43mm and 50mm lens are designed to be used with external viewfinders.

Last edited by kmallick : 10-27-2011 at 07:30.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #12
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 43
Posts: 1,682
In that case I stand corrected. I'm surprised there seems to be so little difference in the FOV between the 65mm frame lines and the 50mm external viewfinder.

So am I right to assume the 50mm lens brings up the 65mm frame lines?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #13
Gerry M
Gerry
 
Gerry M's Avatar
 
Gerry M is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Medford, Oregon, U. S.
Posts: 487
I settled on the 65mm as it seems to cover most situations for me. The 80 was a bit too long and I don't like bothering with an external finder. I know the 65 isn't the solution for everyone, but it works nicely for me.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #14
bob338
Registered User
 
bob338's Avatar
 
bob338 is online now
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sausalito, CA
Posts: 1,164
I had a 43mm briefly, I traded it back to the seller for a Plaubel before I had processed the film I shot with it. I wish I had looked at my film before trading it back! It's a wonderful, near-perfect lens. I plan to buy one again, someday.

I would guess that you won't regret buying one. The only negative I can think of is the viewfinder. It's clear and easy to use, but I don't like external viewfinders in general.

Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #15
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobfrance View Post
So am I right to assume the 50mm lens brings up the 65mm frame lines?
I believe so. I will have to check.

The 43mm is claimed to be a copycat design of the original 10 element Zeiss Biogon lens used for view cameras. It is a stunning lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2011   #16
EdSawyer
Registered User
 
EdSawyer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmallick View Post
I believe so. I will have to check.

The 43mm is claimed to be a copycat design of the original 10 element Zeiss Biogon lens used for view cameras. It is a stunning lens.
That's ken rockwell drivel. It has similarities to the biogon design as do most symmetrical wides like that, but it's above and beyond what the biogon is/was. Mamiya has enough talent to not bother copying a 40+yr old design without improving it substantially.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-28-2011   #17
Turtle
Registered User
 
Turtle is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,470
IMO the 50 is the stand out. Distortion in the corners? I have never seen any!

Much lower vignetting that the 43 and my wide of choice (after the 65).
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1543'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2011   #18
Canyongazer
Canyongazer
 
Canyongazer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hill Country, Texas
Posts: 63
I went through the 43 or 50 as do so many.
I went with the more conservative and sensible choice, the 50.
And regretted it.
Often wished the 50 was a bit wider.
Seriously doubt 43 shooters wish it 7mm longer.
__________________
Panasonic GF1 20mm 1.7
Panasonic LX3
Sony NEX 7 w/ Sigma 19 and 30mm lenses
Konica S3
Nikon F
Nikon D700 and D800e with several---but always one short of "needed" number of lenses
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2011   #19
nathan96
Registered User
 
nathan96 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Buy one of them and be confident you'll wish you purchased the other one.

Grass is greener....
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2011   #20
notraces
Bob Smith
 
notraces is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264
The 43mm is one of the best lenses I've ever used -- I like the combo of the Mamiya 7II / 43mm more than I did my SWC -- I sold the SWC...

If you really want to see what the 7II / 43mm can do -- you should check out this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Photo-Jour-Pic.../dp/0292743491

All shot with the 43mm -- fantastic images...
  Reply With Quote

having both is worthwhile.
Old 11-03-2011   #21
EdSawyer
Registered User
 
EdSawyer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 78
having both is worthwhile.

I have both 43 and 50, and they are both useful for different purposes. Granted, it's not cheap but it is worth it in the long run, I think.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2011   #22
hatidua
Registered User
 
hatidua is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdSawyer View Post
I have both 43 and 50, and they are both useful for different purposes. Granted, it's not cheap but it is worth it in the long run, I think.
Agreed. Although I own all of the Mamiya 7 lenses except for the 210, I could rather happily get by with the two widest options.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2011   #23
kmallick
Registered User
 
kmallick is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
Agreed. Although I own all of the Mamiya 7 lenses except for the 210, I could rather happily get by with the two widest options.
I thought I was the only one who got suckered into the same. Whew! I feel better now.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2011   #24
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is online now
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonrutter View Post
I have both the 80mm and 50mm which are both wonderful lenses. I feel that the 80mm is a touch long at moments and the 50mm to be a bit too wide for some situations which leads me to believe a 65mm would be ideal compromise between them. Not to mention the price point of the 65mm is far more tempting.
I bought the 65mm after using the 80 & 50mm lenses for several years. Like Jason, I was always thinking the 80 was a bit too long and the 50 a bit too wide. I was right, the 65mm is perfect for me. I almost never use the 80 or 50 now as the 65 is always on my camera.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

all 6
Old 11-04-2011   #25
EdSawyer
Registered User
 
EdSawyer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 78
all 6

I admit to having all 6 of the Mamiya 7 lenses, though I have yet to use the 210. I use the wides the most, also.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:05.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.