| Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C. |
10-13-2011
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
jazzwave is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreilly
Whoa. Everyone buy your G lenses now!
|
SStttttt...don't talk too loud, everybody can hear this solution and chasing G lens......the price will going up.

__________________
"It is significant that the greatest creative photographers use simple, basic equipment..." Ansel Adams, The Camera.
Last edited by jazzwave : 10-13-2011 at 04:57.
Reason: add
|
|
|
|
10-13-2011
|
#27
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
The prices of individual G lenses without a G camera are already up.
Camera bodies are becoming cheaper though.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2011
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
Cron is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vienna
Posts: 576
|
if you have a G-lens and no G this seems to be interesting if price and quality are ok
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-13-2011
|
#29
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
The problem is when you have G1/G2 cameras and also lenses; would you sacrifice the cameras to get M mount or LTM G lenses at a cost? Three G lenses would cost about $1000 (+/-) to get converted. You then must sell the G bodies at a loss too.
To be specific:
I bought two G1 bodies plus the 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm for a total of about $800.
If I send out the three lenses to be converted to LTM, there go $1000-$1200.
Then, if I can sell the two G1 bodies at $125 each, that would be $250 saved.
I would then pay about $750-$950 to get the three G lenses as LTM lenses.
Add the cost of $800 to get the cameras and lenses, and the final cost of the three LTM G lenses is about $1600.
Say, 28mm LTM @ $600, 45mm LTM @ $600, and 90mm LTM @ $400.
What would be the cost for used ZM lenses 28-45-90 (or similar) ?
This is where I am now "stuck" ...., assuming that such an adapter looks good, and works well.
Last edited by raid : 10-13-2011 at 06:03.
|
|
|
|
 |
10-13-2011
|
#30
|
|
Revisited
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue
The MS Optical conversions also have focus scales that this conversion will not...if that matters.
|
IMO it matters a lot especially with the 21mm and 28mm G lenses, which you can never use with scale focus and/or hyperfocal distance for very quick snapshots then. Of course you didn't use that way with the G1 and G2, either, but...
Nice project but given this, starting from second hand ZM lenses (providing quite similar results) would be worth it more than getting G lenses and then have them converted with the loss of the focus scales.
So it might be interesting for the 45 Planar G, which you will use with the rangefinder patch anyway.
Otherwise, not too sure...
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-13-2011
|
#31
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
|
That is also my thought. I will never scale focus the 45.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2011
|
#32
|
|
Revisited
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
|
Yes and the 45 G is the only G lens that differs from other standard lenses in performances (when compared with other 40 or 50 lenses in M mount, starting from the Minolta 40 to the last Leica 50 and passing by the ZM and CV ones etc).
The 28 and 21 G are excellent but not very different than their ZM heirs.
So, having at least the 45 G converted so that you can keep using it on a M body makes sense.
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
Field is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 27
Posts: 408
|
I think Ebay sellers watch this website. I do.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#34
|
|
Olympus E-M5/Nikon FE
DNG is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Camby, Indiana
Age: 59
Posts: 2,219
|
So my 45 will go up in value ?
Yippie
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#35
|
|
genius and moron
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
|
I'd love to get ahold of a couple of the spent G mounts if that would be at all possible- I'm trying to hack my 45/2 to bring up a wider VF view.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#36
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
|
Bob, I have some misc. G lens parts you can have...not sure they will be what you need, but they are yours if you want them.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,988
|
I went to their website
http://www.japanexposures.com/lens/
And it looks like they're willing to do a conversion, or sell you the already converted lenses. Seems simple enough, unless I'm missing something here.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
Brian Puccio is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Long Beach, NY, USA
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve M.
I went to their website
http://www.japanexposures.com/lens/
And it looks like they're willing to do a conversion, or sell you the already converted lenses. Seems simple enough, unless I'm missing something here.
|
Yes, though it seems someone else found a different way to get it done for less money, though we're all waiting to hear back how that actually turns out.
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#39
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
|
Haven't gotten the lens yet, should be here in a few days, but here are some pictures.
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
jeremythurs is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue
Haven't gotten the lens yet, should be here in a few days, but here are some pictures.
|
WOW! Looks fantastic. Can you reveal the price for this conversion?
|
|
|
|
12-13-2011
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
marduk is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vienna, AT
Posts: 424
|
In case someone is interested, I saw a converted Contax G 28mm lens on display in one of the shops at Westbahnstraße in Vienna , for 900 euro.
__________________
Leica M3, 25-35-50-90 | IIIf with Summitar and Nikkor-H | Rolleiflex 3.5E | SL66, 50-80-250 | GSW690II and too much LF gear
My RFF Gallery | Me on Flickr
|
|
|
|
12-16-2011
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
Waus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 122
|
I really don't understand this cannibalising of Contax G lenses:
1)the hacked lenses look quite ugly to me
2)you can buy the same focal length of Contax/Cosina for the same amount of money or even cheaper!
But of course it's a matter of personal taste...(and I own a Contax G2 and the prices of the 35/2 and 21/2,8 which I still want to buy have gone throug the roof...)
|
|
|
|
12-21-2011
|
#43
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
|
OK - received the prototype.
Initial reaction: helical is super smooth, with more 'heft' than the original G lens. This feels very much like a 'factory' built lens. Very solid build quality. Dare I say it -- no wobble. And yes, there is a focusing scale.  So this bodes well for the 21s, 28s, and 35s which could would work well with zone/hyperfocal.
Bear in mind, this is a prototype. I'm sure improvements can and will be made. I'll be converting 28 and 35 now for sure.

|
|
|
|
12-21-2011
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
Apophat is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
|
Looks great. How much does it cost?
Mike
|
|
|
|
12-21-2011
|
#45
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
|
Since this is a proto, there will be some improvements, not sure what final pricing will be yet...
|
|
|
|
12-21-2011
|
#46
|
|
Registered User
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,182
|
I have a 45/2 and 90/2.8 that I used with a GF1. The opportunity to possibly move them to a M mount would be fantastic if the quality of the lens is not hampered. I look forward to seeing you post some photographs taken with the 45/2 and report your first impressions.
__________________
______________________
Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
|
|
|
|
12-23-2011
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
partitura is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
|
DigitalIntrigue - This looks very interesting. Do you have any idea when this might be available? I'd be willing to be another beta tester if needed 
|
|
|
|
12-23-2011
|
#48
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seakayaker1
I have a 45/2 and 90/2.8 that I used with a GF1. The opportunity to possibly move them to a M mount would be fantastic if the quality of the lens is not hampered. I look forward to seeing you post some photographs taken with the 45/2 and report your first impressions.
|
[error] It would be impractical to focus a 90mm lens with guess focusing.
|
|
|
|
12-23-2011
|
#49
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue
Since this is a proto, there will be some improvements, not sure what final pricing will be yet...
|
My 28mm lens may become victim to such a modification one day.
Of course, I love testing lenses ..... 
|
|
|
|
12-24-2011
|
#50
|
|
Revisited
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid
It would be impractical to focus a 90mm lens with guess focusing.
|
Raid, those prototypes are fully rangefinder coupled once mounted on the Leica. They now seem to have a focusing scale engraved on their focusing barrels, which is very nice for quick hyperfocal snapshots, especially with the 21 and the 28, but this doesn't mean that they aren't rangefinder coupled.
If they weren't rangefinder coupled, even the 45 would be very tricky to use.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:07. |
|
|