Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Zeiss Contax

Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 10-13-2011   #26
jazzwave
Registered User
 
jazzwave is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreilly View Post
Whoa. Everyone buy your G lenses now!

SStttttt...don't talk too loud, everybody can hear this solution and chasing G lens......the price will going up.

__________________



"It is significant that the greatest creative photographers use simple, basic equipment..." Ansel Adams, The Camera.

Last edited by jazzwave : 10-13-2011 at 04:57. Reason: add
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #27
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
The prices of individual G lenses without a G camera are already up.
Camera bodies are becoming cheaper though.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #28
Cron
Registered User
 
Cron is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vienna
Posts: 576
if you have a G-lens and no G this seems to be interesting if price and quality are ok
__________________
see some pics here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smallrf/
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #29
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
The problem is when you have G1/G2 cameras and also lenses; would you sacrifice the cameras to get M mount or LTM G lenses at a cost? Three G lenses would cost about $1000 (+/-) to get converted. You then must sell the G bodies at a loss too.
To be specific:
I bought two G1 bodies plus the 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm for a total of about $800.
If I send out the three lenses to be converted to LTM, there go $1000-$1200.
Then, if I can sell the two G1 bodies at $125 each, that would be $250 saved.
I would then pay about $750-$950 to get the three G lenses as LTM lenses.
Add the cost of $800 to get the cameras and lenses, and the final cost of the three LTM G lenses is about $1600.
Say, 28mm LTM @ $600, 45mm LTM @ $600, and 90mm LTM @ $400.

What would be the cost for used ZM lenses 28-45-90 (or similar) ?

This is where I am now "stuck" ...., assuming that such an adapter looks good, and works well.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

Last edited by raid : 10-13-2011 at 06:03.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #30
Highway 61
Revisited
 
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue View Post
The MS Optical conversions also have focus scales that this conversion will not...if that matters.
IMO it matters a lot especially with the 21mm and 28mm G lenses, which you can never use with scale focus and/or hyperfocal distance for very quick snapshots then. Of course you didn't use that way with the G1 and G2, either, but...

Nice project but given this, starting from second hand ZM lenses (providing quite similar results) would be worth it more than getting G lenses and then have them converted with the loss of the focus scales.

So it might be interesting for the 45 Planar G, which you will use with the rangefinder patch anyway.

Otherwise, not too sure...
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #31
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
That is also my thought. I will never scale focus the 45.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #32
Highway 61
Revisited
 
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
Yes and the 45 G is the only G lens that differs from other standard lenses in performances (when compared with other 40 or 50 lenses in M mount, starting from the Minolta 40 to the last Leica 50 and passing by the ZM and CV ones etc).

The 28 and 21 G are excellent but not very different than their ZM heirs.

So, having at least the 45 G converted so that you can keep using it on a M body makes sense.
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #33
Field
Registered User
 
Field's Avatar
 
Field is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 27
Posts: 408
I think Ebay sellers watch this website. I do.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #34
DNG
Olympus E-M5/Nikon FE
 
DNG's Avatar
 
DNG is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Camby, Indiana
Age: 59
Posts: 2,219
So my 45 will go up in value ?

Yippie
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #35
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
I'd love to get ahold of a couple of the spent G mounts if that would be at all possible- I'm trying to hack my 45/2 to bring up a wider VF view.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #36
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
Bob, I have some misc. G lens parts you can have...not sure they will be what you need, but they are yours if you want them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #37
Steve M.
Registered User
 
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,988
I went to their website

http://www.japanexposures.com/lens/

And it looks like they're willing to do a conversion, or sell you the already converted lenses. Seems simple enough, unless I'm missing something here.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-14-2011   #38
Brian Puccio
Registered User
 
Brian Puccio is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Long Beach, NY, USA
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve M. View Post
I went to their website

http://www.japanexposures.com/lens/

And it looks like they're willing to do a conversion, or sell you the already converted lenses. Seems simple enough, unless I'm missing something here.
Yes, though it seems someone else found a different way to get it done for less money, though we're all waiting to hear back how that actually turns out.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-13-2011   #39
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
Haven't gotten the lens yet, should be here in a few days, but here are some pictures.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 452.jpg (26.9 KB, 167 views)
File Type: jpg 451.jpg (33.0 KB, 107 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-13-2011   #40
jeremythurs
Registered User
 
jeremythurs is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue View Post
Haven't gotten the lens yet, should be here in a few days, but here are some pictures.
WOW! Looks fantastic. Can you reveal the price for this conversion?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-13-2011   #41
marduk
Registered User
 
marduk is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vienna, AT
Posts: 424
In case someone is interested, I saw a converted Contax G 28mm lens on display in one of the shops at Westbahnstraße in Vienna , for 900 euro.
__________________
Leica M3, 25-35-50-90 | IIIf with Summitar and Nikkor-H | Rolleiflex 3.5E | SL66, 50-80-250 | GSW690II and too much LF gear
My RFF Gallery | Me on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2011   #42
Waus
Registered User
 
Waus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 122
I really don't understand this cannibalising of Contax G lenses:
1)the hacked lenses look quite ugly to me
2)you can buy the same focal length of Contax/Cosina for the same amount of money or even cheaper!
But of course it's a matter of personal taste...(and I own a Contax G2 and the prices of the 35/2 and 21/2,8 which I still want to buy have gone throug the roof...)
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-21-2011   #43
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
OK - received the prototype.

Initial reaction: helical is super smooth, with more 'heft' than the original G lens. This feels very much like a 'factory' built lens. Very solid build quality. Dare I say it -- no wobble. And yes, there is a focusing scale. So this bodes well for the 21s, 28s, and 35s which could would work well with zone/hyperfocal.

Bear in mind, this is a prototype. I'm sure improvements can and will be made. I'll be converting 28 and 35 now for sure.



  Reply With Quote

Old 12-21-2011   #44
Apophat
Registered User
 
Apophat is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Looks great. How much does it cost?

Mike
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-21-2011   #45
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,264
Since this is a proto, there will be some improvements, not sure what final pricing will be yet...
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-21-2011   #46
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,182
I have a 45/2 and 90/2.8 that I used with a GF1. The opportunity to possibly move them to a M mount would be fantastic if the quality of the lens is not hampered. I look forward to seeing you post some photographs taken with the 45/2 and report your first impressions.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
~ M9, M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26672618@N03/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2011   #47
partitura
Registered User
 
partitura is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2
DigitalIntrigue - This looks very interesting. Do you have any idea when this might be available? I'd be willing to be another beta tester if needed
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2011   #48
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by seakayaker1 View Post
I have a 45/2 and 90/2.8 that I used with a GF1. The opportunity to possibly move them to a M mount would be fantastic if the quality of the lens is not hampered. I look forward to seeing you post some photographs taken with the 45/2 and report your first impressions.
[error] It would be impractical to focus a 90mm lens with guess focusing.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-23-2011   #49
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue View Post
Since this is a proto, there will be some improvements, not sure what final pricing will be yet...
My 28mm lens may become victim to such a modification one day.
Of course, I love testing lenses .....
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-24-2011   #50
Highway 61
Revisited
 
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
It would be impractical to focus a 90mm lens with guess focusing.
Raid, those prototypes are fully rangefinder coupled once mounted on the Leica. They now seem to have a focusing scale engraved on their focusing barrels, which is very nice for quick hyperfocal snapshots, especially with the 21 and the 28, but this doesn't mean that they aren't rangefinder coupled.

If they weren't rangefinder coupled, even the 45 would be very tricky to use.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:07.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.