Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Sony NEX

Sony NEX This forum is for the entire Sony NEX series.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

How Accurate is Contrast Peaking Manual Focus?
Old 10-09-2011   #1
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,191
How Accurate is Contrast Peaking Manual Focus?

My NEX-5N was set to Red contrast peaking and I had a Leica 90mm APO ASPH set to f/2.0. It is really great to be able to get a solid positive feedback on your focusing when the white of the eye turns bright red at f/2.0. What is less agreeable are the results. Some of my shots absolutely nail focus and others do not.

I was wondering if others were having mixed results with contrast peaking and fast lenses?

How are fast lenses and focus peaking working with the GXR?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2011   #2
Shade
Registered User
 
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 398
It's quite accurate. But if you're using F1.4 or brighter, it may not be TACK SHARP RIGHT ON SPOT sharp. It's in the sharp-zone.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2011   #3
Nettar
Registered User
 
Nettar is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 40
I made the same observation, bwcolor. I was a happy manual focuser on the Nex 5, using 14x magnification, until peaking came along, and of course I compared the two approaches. I found that, when using a long lens at a wide aperture, the short space of time between when I got focus dead right, using 14x magnification, and pressed the shutter button, was sometimes enough for the subject to move just a little, and throw focus towards the edge of the range of depth of field. For example, focusing on an eye using 14x (or 7x) magnification, and taking the picture perhaps half a second later, is enough for the subject to have moved a little and the plane of focus to be on their nose instead of an eye. It's much the same with focus peaking, as long as the point you want to be in your narrow line of focus is of sufficiently high contrast for a "peak" to occur there. (If it's not then it's back to 7x or 14x magnification...) I found that peaking is a bit faster, but just a little bit less accurate (even after I acquired reasonable experience), so the net outcome is still not the 100% perfectly focused results I had anticipated! But that is life, I guess -- nothing is perfect, especially me... Nettar
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2011   #4
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is online now
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,698
I think kshapero on another thread nailed it with his suggestion. My eyesight not that great as I get older. He suggested using BW mode but shot raw. This way BW is not permanent, but BW LCD mode gave better contrast in order to c with your own eyes when peaking has nailed focus which is acceptable sharp. I find that peaking works fine for me in situations where speed is more important than razor sharp. But 7x mag is only way to nail it Razor sharp for me. But I attribute this to my poor eyesight.

Gary

Last edited by GaryLH : 10-09-2011 at 22:09. Reason: Edited sentence structure
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2011   #5
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryLH View Post
... I find that peaking works fine for me in situations where speed is more important than razor sharp. But 7x mag is only way to nail it Razor sharp for me. But I attribute this to my poor eyesight.
Not at all. Especially for slow wide-angles, peaking is better than nothing, but I always use 7x mag when I have the time...
__________________
Photon Counter
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25547701@N08/
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2011   #6
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
"Focus peaking", a.k.a. contrast detection, works by comparing local contrast across the frame and selecting those regions where there are sharp edges, that is where there is a lot of contrast relatively speaking. Eyesight has little to do with it.

Consequently, it works less well with wideangles (where everything is more or less in focus and it is hard to pick those regions that are a little more in focus). It also doesn't work that well with slow lenses or lenses stopped down (where there is again a broad depth of field range within which everything is somewhat in focus).
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #7
grdglass
Registered User
 
grdglass is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 24
What's the consensus? Is the EVF required when using focus peaking? I would imagine it would help, but is the LCD okay also?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #8
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwcolor View Post
My NEX-5N was set to Red contrast peaking and I had a Leica 90mm APO ASPH set to f/2.0. It is really great to be able to get a solid positive feedback on your focusing when the white of the eye turns bright red at f/2.0. What is less agreeable are the results. Some of my shots absolutely nail focus and others do not.

I was wondering if others were having mixed results with contrast peaking and fast lenses?

How are fast lenses and focus peaking working with the GXR?
You realize you have less than one cm DOF at close focus ? Meaning, however good the camera or focus method is, if you or your subject only move that much after focusing, you'll be off.
__________________
A Year on Film with 50mm lenses (started 03/21/13)
Other Collections: Scapes and People
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #9
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by grdglass View Post
What's the consensus? Is the EVF required when using focus peaking? I would imagine it would help, but is the LCD okay also?
It's easier with the EVF, if only because you're less likely to move your head than your hands after focusing.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #10
Shade
Registered User
 
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 398
Focus peaking is really a great feature despite its flaws. Especially when you need fas focusing and acceptable image. I said acceptable here, not spot on.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #11
Nokton48
Registered User
 
Nokton48's Avatar
 
Nokton48 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,503
I downloaded it into both Nex3's, tried it for a bit, then turned it off.

I still prefer the Clearviewer for my uses. I'm happy with this gear, for what it is.
__________________
Sony Nex-3's/Minolta SRT's/SRM's & XK/Hasselblad's/Plaubel Makiflexes/Sinar Norma's

http://www.flickr.com/groups/656147@N20/pool/
http://www.project-double-x.org/
Some of my older pix: http://www.flickr.com/photos/18134483@N04/3011042809/

L@@king For: 1) The Minolta SR-M 250 Exposure Film Back. 2) The Minolta SR-M Film Loader for 250 Exposure Cartridges. 3) The SR-M Battery Test Lamp. 4) The Minolta Intervalometer PM. 5) The Minolta Intervalometer S.

Last edited by Nokton48 : 10-10-2011 at 12:41.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #12
kshapero
My new hat
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryLH View Post
I think kshapero on another thread nailed it with his suggestion. My eyesight not that great as I get older. He suggested using BW mode but shot raw. This way BW is not permanent, but BW LCD mode gave better contrast in order to c with your own eyes when peaking has nailed focus which is acceptable sharp. I find that peaking works fine for me in situations where speed is more important than razor sharp. But 7x mag is only way to nail it Razor sharp for me. But I attribute this to my poor eyesight.

Gary
True but even with that method, I still use MF assist for wide apertures.
__________________
Akiva S.

Down to a cherished Leica M3 and lots of film based Nikon's.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #13
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferider View Post
You realize you have less than one cm DOF at close focus ? Meaning, however good the camera or focus method is, if you or your subject only move that much after focusing, you'll be off.
Yes, so someone needs to shoot from a tripod using fixed subjects.

Also, I found that contrast peaking is useless in bright sunlight using the rear LCD on a 5N. Maybe it is me, but I just could not see the screen. This is the major reason that I'm returning the camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #14
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is online now
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,698
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero View Post
True but even with that method, I still use MF assist for wide apertures.
Yep. I ended up using that way too when I have the time. After shooting a shot, I tend to move focus setup to my default which is the hyper focal point to catch anything I have no time for.

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #15
Nebster
Registered User
 
Nebster is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2
I find it's just not that good. I shoot a lot of flat-field, static subjects. I usually want to print big, so I need that magic critical sharpness, right in the sweet spot of the DOF. (Losing the AA filter would be a whole additional little boost, but that's another topic.)

I find the peaking isn't quite good enough, and the work required to really nail it (slight movement to see when you get the "most" peaking) is no better than just using the zoom feature.

And when trying to shoot babies or whatever, I find in a lot of situations I'd rather be in zoom mode, on the eyeball or what have you, and then fire at peak focus. There are only some situations where I'd rather be at 100% view with peaking on. (Multi-subject dynamic situations, bright sunlight, and maybe a few others.)

So I guess it's okay for casual snapshotting and as a complement to zoom. But zoomed live view nets more keepers for my most common styles of shooting.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2011   #16
Ronald M
Registered User
 
Ronald M is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,678
You are expecting way too much from those toys. They are built for slow short lenses.

90 2.0 is taxing to a Leica and you can hold it steady unlike the Zombie cameras.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-11-2011   #17
kshapero
My new hat
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwcolor View Post
Yes, so someone needs to shoot from a tripod using fixed subjects.

Also, I found that contrast peaking is useless in bright sunlight using the rear LCD on a 5N. Maybe it is me, but I just could not see the screen. This is the major reason that I'm returning the camera.
Works well if you shot B/W but still a hassle
__________________
Akiva S.

Down to a cherished Leica M3 and lots of film based Nikon's.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #18
xpanded
Registered User
 
xpanded's Avatar
 
xpanded is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: €urope
Posts: 581
I prefer magnification with NEX-3 and Contax G 45mm over peaking. Cannot tell if it is only my sample (camera body + lens + 2 x photographer (since he is usually the weakest link)), but I rarely get sharp pictures with peaking whereas magnification (7 times) usually is a hit.

Even at f8 or f11 are the results with peaking usually only sharpish and not sharp.

Edit: Initially I thought that maybe the medium-priced adapter was to blame since it is a little rough, but since the magnification mode is OK apparently not.

Whatever the focusing mode I really adore the NEX for allowing me to use my Contax again.

Last edited by xpanded : 10-13-2011 at 02:03.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #19
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,939
Damn, I was interested in the NEX-7 until I read this... I hate magnification and thought focus peaking was the answer in an EVF. Of course, I'll try for myself, but I'm not as excited anymore.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #20
xpanded
Registered User
 
xpanded's Avatar
 
xpanded is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: €urope
Posts: 581
Don't get your hopes down just because of me :-)
It may indeed be a man-machine interface problem.
And it is likely that it is much easier to see in the EVF.
Or maybe we have just been spoiled over time getting used to almost 100% accurate focusing?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2011   #21
douglasf13
Registered User
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
douglasf13 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 495
Focus peaking, just like rangefinder focusing, takes quite a bit of practice to perfect, and, like rangefinder focusing, I still occasionally miss things. However, overall, once things like parallax and focus shift are taken into consideration, I'd say I'm now a bit more accurate with focus peaking than I am with a rangefinder.

Practice makes perfect!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.