| DIYS Forum DIYS aka Do It Yourself Projects - mostly gear modifications |
 |
Angenieux Film lens 35/0.95 remounted for LTM |
 |
07-06-2011
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
sparrow6224 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York NY
Posts: 844
|
Angenieux Film lens 35/0.95 remounted for LTM
I thought Mr Sweeney and friends would be most interested in this nugget from e-harbor, including reference to the work being done "by the most famous Japanese lens remount technician Mr Miyazaki Sadayasu"
That's how they talk about Sweeney in Japan too. or Beijing, in this case.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Unique-Angenieux...item3cb8636789
Brian: any thoughts? As my Irish grandma used to say, "I never haird of such a thing."
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011
|
#2
|
|
Unsui
Moriturii is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 672
|
Aren't movie cameras made for movie sized negatives, i.e, half frames, like the Olympus Pen F? How would this work with a normal full frame 35mm picture?
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011
|
#3
|
|
Camera hacker
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,111
|
It might make a fantastic macro lens with zero depth of field...
Phil Forrest
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moriturii
Aren't movie cameras made for movie sized negatives, i.e, half frames, like the Olympus Pen F? How would this work with a normal full frame 35mm picture?
|
Well this may be a 35mm movie camera lens, I'm not sure, however some lenses designed for 16mm movie cameras have also been adapted to LTM with apparently some success, or at least a fan base.
This is an interesting piece of work, but I'd be extremely surprised if they got their asking price of 29K for it.
__________________
Contax IIa, Tanack IV-S, Canon L1, Leotax S, Kardon Civilian, Bessa R2S, Nikon S2, Leica, IIIa, Kalloflex, Kowa 6, Konica Autoreflex T, Canon Ftb QL, Pentax Spotmatic, Minolta SRT-101, Nikon F, Exakta VX
http://legacycamera.wordpress.com
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
wolfpeterson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Montreal, Qc
Age: 25
Posts: 191
|
Just sent a question asking for sample images. We'll see if it happens 
|
|
|
|
07-07-2011
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
|
Just saw this, was doing a lens project last evening.
That's amazing. I can believe that a Movie production had the budget to have custom lenses made for filming, this could be one of them. The diameter of the optics suggest a movie format, I will be interested in seeing the images taken with the lens. I've seen some $40,000 lenses with a production run of 8 lenses.
Of course the good news is- it would probably be perfect for the M8...
Last edited by Brian Sweeney : 07-07-2011 at 01:43.
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
kpas is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 36
|
These lens are sought after for m4/3rds, but even on that sensor they still have significant vignetting.
An interesting remount though, and rangefinder coupled - love to know how it was done!
Thanks for posting it!
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
paulcurtis is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 40
|
Odd looking movie lens, especially for 35mm. It's too small really. The condition looks fairly newish, but any modern movie lens would not have aperture markings like that, would have a large focusing ring and where does the follow focus go?
I wonder if it's a 35mm f0.95 movie 'projector' lens that has been rehoused. Very different beast...
I have a couple of those i accidentally bought from the bay before realising!
cheers
paul
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
|
Projector lenses usually do not have an aperture mechanism.
Probably a movie camera lens. I am NOT spending the money to find out!
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#10
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
I have to use my $30 25mm/1.4 ... this is too expensive for me.
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#11
|
|
That's really me
ItsReallyDarren is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 1,380
|
Talk about a runaway budget to create a lens like that.
Looks like the seller will post some pictures from the lens soon. I'm itching to see some pictures from that lens.
__________________
so many choices, so little difference...
*
|
|
|
|
07-08-2011
|
#12
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
|
They better be "$28,000 Photos" ..... anything less would be a scam.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47. |
|
|