Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Film / Developing / Chemistry

View Poll Results: War of the Cheapies - 400 color film
Kodak Gold 400 130 32.83%
Fuji Superia 400 242 61.11%
Other Color 400 24 6.06%
Voters: 396. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

War of the cheapies - Kodak Gold 400 vs Fuji Superia 400
Old 06-22-2011   #1
kshapero
Tourist
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 8,670
War of the cheapies - Kodak Gold 400 vs Fuji Superia 400

Sometimes I am on the road or just desperate and stop by a drug store to get film. Which would you choose?
__________________
Akiva S.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #2
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,775
Gold is more fun with the colors and grain, but Superia is more accurate with color tones. Gold is warmer, Superia is cooler.

I like Gold, but would use Superia if skin tones are important.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #3
zauhar
Registered User
 
zauhar's Avatar
 
zauhar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,851
I just tried Superia, and I think the color rendition is better than Kodak Gold, especially for low-light:



I would go with Superia again as a cheap color film.

Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #4
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdigital View Post
Gold is more fun with the colors and grain, but Superia is more accurate with color tones. Gold is warmer, Superia is cooler.

I like Gold, but would use Superia if skin tones are important.
I've used both, and I feel like fdigital. The best deal around here WAS at Costco. $1.39 for a 24 Superia. I used to buy the 6-7 packs, but they discontinued. I should have gone in there and bought them out.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #5
kshapero
Tourist
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 8,670
Ultraonline has good deals on Fuji.
__________________
Akiva S.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #6
efix
RF user by conviction
 
efix's Avatar
 
efix is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 750
None of them. Don't like the colours in Superia, and don't like the grain in Gold. My tip: Take a reasonable amount of rolls of your favourite emulsion with you. Better yet -- keep them in a cigarette-lighter-powered car mini fridge ;-)
__________________
"In my humble estimate, there’s a huge lack of appreciation out there for the wonderful aesthetic look that film of all types can lend to an image. Sadly, that doesn’t seem to count in a world that is rushing nowhere like a lot of headless chickens." – Jonathan Eastland
facebook | twitter | flickr! | 500px
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #7
kshapero
Tourist
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 8,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by efix View Post
None of them. Don't like the colours in Superia, and don't like the grain in Gold. My tip: Take a reasonable amount of rolls of your favourite emulsion with you. Better yet -- keep them in a cigarette-lighter-powered car mini fridge ;-)
Fine and good but sometimes Sh-t just happens.
__________________
Akiva S.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #8
kermaier
Registered User
 
kermaier's Avatar
 
kermaier is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,474
Fuji Superia. When I still shot 35mm, that was my standard travel film. Lush greens, muted reds. I also liked that you could get it in various ISO ratings too. Fuji Press 400 is very similar.
::Ari
__________________
Epson R-D1s with far too many lenses
Fuji X100
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #9
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
 
SolaresLarrave's Avatar
 
SolaresLarrave is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DeKalb, IL, USA
Age: 55
Posts: 6,782
I used to like Fuji until I saw the way greens come up... and did't quite like it (and that roll had a lot of grass in every frame). I do like the color rendition in Kodak.

Fuji's transparency film is the best... but only after Kodachrome.
__________________
-Francisco
Check out
My Leica M4-2 Blog and/or
My Nikon D700 Neophyte's Guide
No longer selling any Nikon SLR glass...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #10
Bruin
Noktonian
 
Bruin is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 323
Superia 400 shot at 250. But Superia 200 is the best cheap color film IMHO - more moderate contrast and saturation than 100/400, and actually sharper than Ektar (though larger-grained).
__________________
~Kevin

Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 35/1.2 v1, Nokton 50/1.5
Neopan 400, Acros 100, 160S


Last edited by Bruin : 06-22-2011 at 09:00. Reason: clarity
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #11
johannielscom
985 & 532/16
 
johannielscom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 6,677
Buy American, buy Kodak!

I prefer Kodacolor400 shot as 320 and subsequently would probably pick Kodak Gold 400 here.
__________________
Cheers, Johan Niels

Read my articles on camera gear on www.johanniels.com


MULTIPLE TRADES in the classifieds
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #12
AFenvy
Registered User
 
AFenvy's Avatar
 
AFenvy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Mexico
Age: 25
Posts: 113
I have not shot with Kodak Gold, although I have seen many shots with it that have fantastic colors. The Superia I have shot with a good amount, and I do NOT like it. Superia 400 I think is terrible, grainy, washed out, bad colors, too much red, weird greens. Superia Xtra 400 is far better, but still washed out and too red. Superia 200 is a good film, and I like the results I have gotten with it, good colors, nice rendition, but still has an ugly grainy aspect to it.

I wont shoot with 400 speed Superia anymore, I might occasionally use Superia 200, but honestly, life is too short to waste it shooting crappy film. When the colors are as underwhelming as they are in these cheap color films you might as well shoot black and white!

Last edited by AFenvy : 06-22-2011 at 09:14.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #13
robbeiflex
Registered User
 
robbeiflex's Avatar
 
robbeiflex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 858
Not so fond of the Fuji colours. I voted Gold, although as far as I can tell where I live they call it "Farbwelt".
__________________
"They say, ‘If you use this digital camera, you can take a clear picture in the dark’. The dark should stay dark. You can’t really see that much, and you don’t really want to see that much anyway.” Nobuyoshi Araki 2006

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #14
sniki
Registered User
 
sniki's Avatar
 
sniki is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Age: 56
Posts: 261
Definitely Fuji without the slightest doubt!
If still doubtful look at this guy, he mostly uses Superia 400:
http://contaxg.com/user.php?id=4580&page=user_images
__________________
sniki
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #15
jan normandale
Film is the other way
 
jan normandale's Avatar
 
jan normandale is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: on Location
Posts: 3,911
I've shot both and like both. Someone said Gold's warmer and I think it is and I like it for that. Superia at 400 ISO is a great film for all purpose light situations and the colours pop. I find scanned Superia using a KM Scan Dual IV really pops and I like that look.

I could comment on other colour films but the OP is Gold or Superia.

FWIW: Kodak Gold 100 is the only one... the 200 or 400 suck..
__________________
RFF Gallery
flickr
Blog

it's all about light
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #16
hexiplex
Registered User
 
hexiplex's Avatar
 
hexiplex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Age: 26
Posts: 246
I shoot colour so rarely I never have the need to dip into the cheapies, but I do really like Superia 400. I remember it being a treat on my Mamiya in medium format especially.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #17
TXForester
Registered User
 
TXForester's Avatar
 
TXForester is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alba, Texas
Posts: 1,011
I haven't shot Kodak in a long time, so I don't know if today's film is different. I used to like Kodak films. I've used Fuji in 200 and 800. I can live with the greens, but my skies always have a funky color regardless of the lens the light passes through.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #18
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,514




Top Fuji Superia, bottom Kodak Gold 200. My problem is the difficulty in getting consistent results with all my crazy post processing programs.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #19
mackigator
Registered User
 
mackigator's Avatar
 
mackigator is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 538
Superia 400 wins hands down for me. Bonus: it's still cheap even if ordered fresh online. Get a big block and stick it in the fridge. It will surprise you.
__________________
Images: Flickr
Work: Web Marketing
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #20
atlcruiser
Part Yeti
 
atlcruiser is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,218
Superia...i sort of like it!


cc mid473.jpg by urbanlandcruiser, on Flickr
__________________
David

leica M6 ttl
Hassy X Pan
Big ass Fuji G690BL
Some really BIG ASS LF stuff

my flikr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53092319@N04/

my website:
www.dearbornphoto.com

southeastern RFF flikr: Please look/join
http://www.flickr.com/groups/1643169@N21/?added=6
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-22-2011   #21
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
 
bobby_novatron's Avatar
 
bobby_novatron is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: the Great White North (Canada)
Age: 44
Posts: 610
I begrudgingly acknowledge that Kodak Gold and Superia both have their charms.

This one was shot on Kodak Gold 200. Very minimal PP afterwards in Adobe.

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2011   #22
40oz
...
 
40oz is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by charjohncarter View Post
[IMG]Superia[/IMG]

[IMG]Gold[/IMG]

Top Fuji Superia, bottom Kodak Gold 200. My problem is the difficulty in getting consistent results with all my crazy post processing programs.
I could tell right away. I agree with most others here - Superia has more green, perhaps to much, while Gold has a warmer tone. I don't care about color accuracy if it doesn't result in a picture I like.

IMHO it's a personal preference thing. I vastly prefer Kodak Gold in all speeds to Superia, but other people have taken pictures I like with Superia.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2011   #23
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
 
Ronald_H's Avatar
 
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 43
Posts: 1,700
Superia hands down. I use the 400 version as my standard C41 film.
__________________
"The only substitute for Tri-X is more Tri-X"

My Flickr

My regular website: www.lookupinwonder.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2011   #24
NickTrop
Registered User
 
NickTrop's Avatar
 
NickTrop is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,584
Wow... another thread where I wonder what RFF members are smokin'... Kodak blows Fuji away in everything in in 35mm color print up to and including 400 ISO. Above 400 ISO in color print, it's Fuji.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-24-2011   #25
AFenvy
Registered User
 
AFenvy's Avatar
 
AFenvy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Mexico
Age: 25
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTrop View Post
Wow... another thread where I wonder what RFF members are smokin'... Kodak blows Fuji away in everything in in 35mm color print up to and including 400 ISO. Above 400 ISO in color print, it's Fuji.

I definitely agree! Where are you guys getting good color out of the Superia? Mine is generally a crapshoot with most of the roll looking terrible and a select few having good color. It only looks good in a select few lighting situations.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.