Advice
Old 06-10-2011   #1
begona
Goran Begoņa
 
begona's Avatar
 
begona is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 355
Advice

Sell recent CLEd M3 and buy M6? lightmeter is only reason
Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #2
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,786
I would...but I always prefer a built in light meter.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #3
gshybrid
Registered User
 
gshybrid's Avatar
 
gshybrid is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 765
What other cameras do you have? I sold my M6 and picked up an M4 because I wanted something different from my M9. Meterless cameras changes the way you shoot... or at least the way I shoot. Sometimes I like the more contemplative style that shooting a meterless camera requires.
__________________
website

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #4
segedi
RFicianado
 
segedi's Avatar
 
segedi is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 857
If it were me, I'd buy a Voigtlander VC Meter II and keep the M3. When I go meterless (hasselblad) I'll take a meter reading and shoot it until the light changes and then just open up or stop down depending on need. So you can have a shoe mounted meter and it doesn't get in the way of shootin'.
__________________
-----------------------

Segedi.com

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #5
t.s.k.
Hooked on philm
 
t.s.k.'s Avatar
 
t.s.k. is online now
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chi·ca'·go
Posts: 628
I carry a light meter with me regardless of what camera I have with me.
When the batteries die on both of my M6s, I won't replace them.
Advice? Get an M2 or M4/P.
__________________
- tony -

You can observe a lot by just watching.
-- Yogi Berra
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #6
Chris101
I'm seeing double!
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,625
When I am shooting with a manual camera with an internal meter, like my OM-1n, I spend a lot of time adjusting the exposure. When I have an external meter for, say my M4-P, then I meter the scene and set the shutter and aperture accordingly, and make adjustments on the fly. It's much faster for me to shoot with a camera without that meter in the viewfinder always telling me what to do!
__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2011   #7
Vics
Registered User
 
Vics's Avatar
 
Vics is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,358
Me, too. I like my M3 without meter, especially since I started shooting with a wide-angle lens. I take incident readings now and then, but then I just keep shooting til it seems the light changes. I'll never sell my M3, or my Summaron 35/2.8!
__________________
Vic
Leica M3, Contax IIIa, Rollei MX, Nikon F and FM

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #8
RichardB
Registered User
 
RichardB is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 324
Yes!--Dick
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #9
Richard G
Registered User
 
Richard G's Avatar
 
Richard G is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 37,47 S
Posts: 3,533
What Chris said. It took me years to ignore the red LEDs in the M6 viewfinder. That said, I am glad I have it and I use it and it is a very good meter and when I take that out with a 35 I carry nothing else. With the M2 I take my Gossen, but if I am out in predictable light I won't take a meter at all. The M6 is a great camera, but I would miss my M2 which is a much finer thing. The Leica M6 is an uncomplaining work horse. All those dabates about which is the best M - I have the M2 and the M5, two serious contenders - should be decided in favour of the M6. Notice I haven't actually given any advice.
__________________
Richard
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #10
B.S.
Registered User
 
B.S.'s Avatar
 
B.S. is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 25
Posts: 30
While having the ability/skill to get good pictures without a light meter is a good one to have, as a person who currently has a camera with a broken light meter-- Get the M6. I used my friends the other week and it was so nice to have the internal light meter available for when I needed it.

But, if you can swing it, keep the M3 AND get the M6. The M3 is pretty tops, IMO.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #11
retnull
Registered User
 
retnull is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
The light meter app for the iPhone works as well as any other light meter. And if you own a iPhone, it's automatically always with you. Since I realized that, I'm indifferent to any camera's light meter.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #12
Steve Bellayr
Registered User
 
Steve Bellayr's Avatar
 
Steve Bellayr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,581
Get the M6. Besides the meter it has the 35mm frameline (+28mm frameline) and carry a spare battery instead of a meter. Street shooting is fast and sometimes moving from location to location will change the reading.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #13
mcaplin
Registered User
 
mcaplin is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 18
I variously use sunny16, the pocket lightmeter app and a VC II shoe mount light meter with my M3. All three methods provide adequate exposure data for tri-x or similar. If in doubt, over expose. I also frame using the whole VF on my M3 for 35mm focal length. After years of SLRs with built in light meters, I find I now usually set and forget with very few 'negative' consequences.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #14
zauhar
Registered User
 
zauhar's Avatar
 
zauhar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,850
You may also be able to get a refurbished Leica MR meter for your M3. They are not that popular on this forum, but have the advantage of coupling to the shutter speed, cover a pretty wide intensity range, and they are of course "original". I got mine from QLM (Mr. Milton) and have been very happy with it.

That said, the VC shoe meter is the quick and easy alternative.

Randy
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #15
daninjc
Registered User
 
daninjc's Avatar
 
daninjc is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 282
I probably would - the built-in light-meter is extremely practical to me.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #16
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,311
Keep the M3, add the M6. Great pair.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #17
rogerzilla
Registered User
 
rogerzilla is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 993
M6 0.85, maybe; but nothing is built like an M3.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2011   #18
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
 
drewbarb's Avatar
 
drewbarb is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,351
I sold an M6, and kept the M3. Actually, I bought another M3. I get better metering and faster shooting with and external meter, so I prefer to work that way. Clearly some here feel the same, and others find the opposite to be true. Which one are you? YMMV.
__________________
-drew
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2011   #19
begona
Goran Begoņa
 
begona's Avatar
 
begona is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 355
thank you all for advices but I will keep my M3...With Summicron DR is great combination. Cheers
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.