Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

most of us own a few lenses...
Old 05-21-2011   #1
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
most of us own a few lenses...

...but do we mostly use one favourite?

or maybe 2?

i have a small but pretty good (i would say) collection of lenses for my use.
i have settled on the smaller cv lenses along with the small rollei 40.

yet, i seem to mostly use the 40 lately with the occasional 75 thrown into the mix.

do you use your lens kit about equally or do you tend to concentrate on one or 2 lenses that you favour?

curious minds want to know...
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #2
SciAggie
Registered User
 
SciAggie's Avatar
 
SciAggie is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 775
If you were to grab one of my cameras it's a 50/50 chance there is either a 35 or 50mm lens attached. I have quite a few other lenses that I do use, but those two focal lengths are the workhorses.
__________________
Gary
Amateur Image Architect

http://strickspics.zenfolio.com
RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #3
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,128
50 mostly on full frame. 40 in digital m. And 80 on 66. Boring I know
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #4
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 16,120
gotta say i'm starting to see in the 35mm FL because of the cv 35/2.5 color skopar i have for my r2m. i'm starting to like what i see in the images produced by the kit. the cv 50/2.5 has been languishing a couple of weeks because of this, but it will see the light on the iiif to arrive early next week.
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #5
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 798
I seem to be using my Canon 35/1.8 on my r-d1, not nearly as much as I should be but far more than my 28 and 50's.

Note to self...I gotta get out more and just shoot stuff, change lenses, get the feel of them and get stuck into it instead of waiting for the 'shot'. I'm all thumbs and procrastination at the moment....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #6
andredossantos
Registered User
 
andredossantos is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,444
Over the past year: I shoot a 35mm on my M5, a 55mm on my film SLR, a 50mm on my DSLR, 75mm on my Rolleiflex, and 100mm on my Fujica 6x9.

I don't own any other lenses except for a recently acquired 50mm f2 Nippon Kogaku LTM that is being repaired.
__________________

Website

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #7
StillKicking
Registered User
 
StillKicking is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Judging from my photo archive, over the last 12 months I seem to use my:
35mm Summaron f3.5 most.. then it's any one of several 50mm lens
__________________
M3, M9, Rolleiflex 3.5 B and Rolleicord II

Advice and constructive criticism always welcome..
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #8
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
 
tbarker13's Avatar
 
tbarker13 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,142
Depends on what I am doing. Just normal usage - it would be a 35 summicron on my M8.
If I am doing portraits, it would be a 50 - but I cannot say I have a favorite.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #9
DennisPT
Registered User
 
DennisPT is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 251
28-40-50 but who know what happens tomorrow.
__________________
Once the picture is in the box, I'm not all that interested in what happens next. Hunters, after all, aren't cooks.– HCB
Leica M6, M8.2 & assorted lens & Minolta Dimage Pro Scanner.
Latest GAS attack: DP2M
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #10
jky
Registered User
 
jky is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Flamescity Canada
Posts: 1,341
Just a 35mm for me although I have a 28mm VC sitting in the cabinet. Reason is I jsut prefer the 35 FL.
__________________
Flickr


  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #11
Brian Legge
Registered User
 
Brian Legge is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,914
I've been trying to focus on 50mm as I like older MF cameras and sticking to a single focal length as much as possible seems like a good idea. Its tough though, coming from fixed lens rangefinders with 40mm lenses.

I need to get one of my 35mm LTM lenses in better condition and hopefully I'll be set. The Summaron is dirty and the J12 focus is way off. The former I'll leave to tech but the later I just need to take some time to fix myself. Maybe that will become my go-to focal length eventually.
__________________
Shooting whatever I can get my hands on.
Recent Work
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #12
Rico
Registered User
 
Rico's Avatar
 
Rico is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 805
It's strange that, with 28 Elmarit ASPH and 50 'lux v2 at my disposal, I always choose the Summaron 35/2.8 and classic Elmar 50/2.8.
__________________

Rico Tudor. Leica M4, IIIb, 28, 35, 50, 90, 135, 280. Contax T, RTS; Canon; Nikon; Profoto
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #13
sonofdanang
Shane Tyler Adams
 
sonofdanang's Avatar
 
sonofdanang is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,025
Joe, you know me to be a bad, bad, man: The only rangefinder I use is on a 4x5 and for most work I use one lens - a 28-300 zoom on a D3. Everybody be falling down when I say it is light, and, with the speed of the D-series sensors and my predilection for depth-of-field and telephoto field-compression, perfect. I don't worry about putting it in my pocket because the thing seems permanently attached to my face.

There is a fast 50 and a 20-30 zoom in the bag that almost never come out. The fifty is a left over from the film days when I needed the speed. But now, with the Nikon's low-light performance....
__________________
www.shanetyleradams.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2011   #14
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 37
Posts: 5,925
I use a 50mm Summicron the most, followed by 28mm Biogon ZM. My others don't get much use, but they're nice to have when needed.
__________________
Christopher Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana

Back home again in Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com

My Technical Info pages: Film Developing times, scanning, printing, editing.

Like My Work on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #15
ricnak
Registered User
 
ricnak is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 951
As a newbie to RF my fav lens was the 35 lux - it is forgiving. I almost sold all my other lenses because I rarely used them.

Then....

I read a thread here once about FL's and someone stated that 35mm was for slobs (not the exact words but you get the general feeling). I did not want to be a slob (even though I am one) so, I now use the 50, 75 and 35mm in equal proportions. The 21 and 90 for special occasions.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #16
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
 
HuubL's Avatar
 
HuubL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 60
Posts: 2,063
35 (v4) and 50 (latest) summicrons about equal on an M6 and M7. The 21 SA never leaves the M4. I have other lenses (DR50, 35 v1, 2.8 summarons) but hardly use them. They're just sitting pretty on the other M4, M3 and M2. I know it's a waste, but I'm too much of a collector to sell them.
__________________

Grain, not Noise!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #17
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,188
My lenses have formed a union and negotiated a "fair use" doctrine. Egalitarianism has been compromised though by a mid-pack voting cabal in the 35-50 range...
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #18
Damaso
Photojournalist
 
Damaso's Avatar
 
Damaso is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,864
50mm on my M6 and 35 cv on my M8. The 90mm summarit comes into play about 15% of the time....
__________________
Damaso

My Blog
Personal Instruction
In Photography


M8
M6TTL .58
M6TTL .85
50mm Summilux Pre-Asph
90mm Summarit
Ultron 35 f1.7
VC 75 f2.5
  Reply With Quote

Definitely
Old 05-22-2011   #19
noimmunity
phound photography
 
noimmunity's Avatar
 
noimmunity is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lyon/Taipei
Age: 50
Posts: 2,439
Definitely

My usage breaks down into the following pairs:

21 plus a normal and/or a tele when hiking.
35 and 75 for candid portraits in town/low light.
28 and 50 for ultimate ease and portability.

With the M8 crop factor, I can do all of the above with just three lenses, heh-heh. (The M8 actually messed me up and I can no longer tell if I'm a 35/75, a 28/50 or what).

But I'd rather have FF on both digital and film. I'm thinking about selling some lenses and getting an M9, or maybe just saving the dough for a rainy day.
__________________
jon 小強

搬到畫國後免疫系統變得超強,所過的生活宅到不行!

The old adage says: Seeing is believing. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.

flickr (recently rewarded for not staying 'pro')
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #20
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,822
My choices change over time. In general I am much more a longer rather than a wider lens lover. At the moment I am experimenting with and loving the Voigtlander 50mm f1.1 Nokton having aslo recently readed in a few older camera and lenses for a 75mm f1.8 of the same marque. But I have a full complement of modern(ish) Leica glass - Summicron 50 and 35, TeleElmarit 90 all from the 1980s era plus some classic lenses from the 50s and 60s - Summitar 50, Elmar 50, Summaron 35mm f3.5 and Tele Elmar 90. Some how I find that I struggle with wide lenses but have more success with the longer variety. So that is my one constant. Long works for me.
__________________
Peter M

Flickr me: http://www.flickr.com/photos/80702381@N00/[SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #21
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,184
I too tend toward one main lens, though it shifts over time. I shot with a 50 by far the most for years, then was using the 28 almost exclusively for quite a while. Just seem to be done with the 35/1.4 pre-ASPH as my main lens and am moving back to the 50, but I've been shooting with a 21 a fair bit of late as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #22
mfogiel
Registered User
 
mfogiel's Avatar
 
mfogiel is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monaco
Posts: 2,655
It comes down to several factors. I try to learn the strong points of each FL, and of each lens in the group. Then, I tend to chose the lenses best suited for the particular type of shots I want to do. However, as walk around lenses, I use most often compact lenses with strong universal qualities. In 50mm I would take the Summilux 2 out most of the time, but I will swap it for the DR Summicron if I am thinking of landscape or architecture, and with the C Sonnar or Canon 50/1.2 for portraits. In 35mm I have fallen lately for the Summicron V3 for its out of focus and great grayscale rendering. I will swap it for the 35/2.8 Summaron for landscape or architecture and with 35/1.2 Nokton for the low light. Both the Summicron and the Nokton are also gret for portraits, but the rendering is distinctly different. In 28mm the Summicron is my universal lens, but I will swap it with the 1.9 ultron for landscape. In 21mm I like the rendering of Super Angulon 3.4, but I will often swap it wih the C Zeiss because of AE compatibility and more compact dimensions. The Zeiss ZM line, C Sonnar apart, is great for a more biting, higher contrast look, and generally for colour. I seldom use 90mm lenses, and in this FL I use the V1 and the last Elmarit together with the ZF Planar 85 and Makro Planar 100, according to circumstances.
__________________
MY PORTFOLIOS


WTB: TAKUMAR 58/2.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #23
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,103
Sometimes it's really hard to decide if I need a 50, 53, 55, 57, 58, or 60. But I eventually settle on a choice.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #24
umcelinho
Marcelo
 
umcelinho's Avatar
 
umcelinho is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo
Age: 30
Posts: 1,294
I think it all comes down to your personal preference or the moment. I have a few lenses, but most of them are either 35mm or 50mm. There are a few that I will pick up to shoot much more often due to their characteristics: if I want a classic look, I'll take X, if I need speed I'll take Y, and so on...
__________________
Gear:
• right eye
• right index finger
• cameras & lenses

What I've seen around: flickr

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2011   #25
helenhill
MoDeRaToR-To Love & Light
 
helenhill's Avatar
 
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
For the longest Time
It was the 50 (probably always will be)
with around 10% to the 21SA

Now I am Dedicating my Time w/ the 35
Need to Grow & 'see 'differently
Have Fallen hard for the 35 Asph Cron
And am Experimenting With
trying to PUSH Shadow/Light Play with the asph glass

Am Amazed at how WIDE 35 is
Regards-H
__________________
flickr


Last edited by helenhill : 05-22-2011 at 04:44.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:56.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.