Fuji v Kodak for portraits ?

[Havoc]

I'd like opinions on the plus and minus points if there are any of the specialist 120 film that both these companies produce for portrait work ? What are the differences in colour, contrast, sharpness etc.... Thanks in advance for any help as usual.

[kzphoto]

Kodak Portra films render skin tones with a bit more ease than Fuji films. Fuji 400h / 160s have a lot of magenta in them that is kinda hard to remove in post processing.

No examples off hand, but I'd go with Kodak Portra for portraits.

[excellent]

Portra Portra Portra

[kzphoto]

Heather & Ashley by kzamani, on Flickr
Fuji 160S at ASA 100


Flower Girls Approach the Aisle by kzamani, on Flickr
Fuji 160S at ASA 100

[bensyverson]

If you're scanning, there is no difference.

[tj01]

Originally Posted by excellent

Portra Portra Portra

+1

The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters