Micro-NIKKOR 55/3.5 Preset

[angelodal]

I've been looking around for a nice macro lens to play around with and came across a Micro-Nikkor 55 3.5 for sale. It's the pre-ai version without the auto diaphragm and goes up to 1:1 magnification (i think). I could get it for around $100, is that too much money to spend on an old lens? I heard/read that this lens is somewhat rare?

What other lenses should I look at that will give similar/better results and prolly cheaper.

Thanks,
Angelo

[Mablo]

Maybe this one: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/28105af.htm

It does have 'good macro abilities' and is compatible with most Nikon bodies. Price is in $150 range but this is much more modern and more versatile tool. A Pre-Ai lens can only be used with a limited number of Nikon bodies.

[angelodal]

I forgot to mention that I use F2's and really don't mind metering and non-ai/ai/ai-s compatibility.

I haven't tried using modern AF zoom lenses on my cameras tho, how is manual focusing with these? I believe there are no DOF indicators since it's the outer-most ring that turns and focuses them.

Thanks
Angelo

[mynikonf2]

Are you sure it is the pre-set version of the 55 micro lens as these sell for $500 up, depending upon condition? The pre-set is a rare lens (total production of 2277 units) and though it is does have good macro ablilities, you would do better with the early auto diaphragm, compensating macro lens. These can be purchased for around $75, in minty condition, including the 1:1 m/m2 extension tube.

[angelodal]

Yes, in fact the seller stated that it is the 1:1 version. It says Nippon Kogaku Japan Micro-NIKKOR on the lens, doesn't say auto anywhere, so it must be the preset.

Other than being a rare/collectible lens, is it a good performer? Will it do for non-macro work too?

Thanks
Angelo

[sevo]

Originally Posted by angelodal

Other than being a rare/collectible lens, is it a good performer? Will it do for non-macro work too?

The rangefinder one is supposed to be identical, and is very good (relative to other normals and macro lenses of the period) at any distance. But even though it already started good, the 55mm got even better on every update (well, the floating element does not coexist too well with extension rings or bellows, so there are applications where the excellent f/2.8 loses some of its excellence). If it is not for collection purposes or to match a equally old camera and use a consistent period piece, I'd go with a cheaper, later one...