Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Technique: How To Shoot It

Technique: How To Shoot It Ask questions about how to take pics, as well as share your own favorite shooting tips.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

From 40mm to 50mm, or cropping?
Old 04-11-2011   #1
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
From 40mm to 50mm, or cropping?

Hi,
I have a Minolta CLE and I do a lot of street/people shooting. Check my flickr set if you want to get an idea of what I shoot.

Though I have a 15mm and 90mm as well, I always find myself shooting with the 40mm Rokkor 2.0. I love this lens.

I often interact with my subjects, but I still have kind of an preferred distance. I think it's a "social distance". However, I end up cropping most of my images. Not substantially, but little distracting details on the side/top/bottom. Also, I often find that my subject is just a little too small in the frame.

Do you think getting a 50mm would limit this problem? Or would new distractions simply re-appear because of my shooting style? I could keep using the 40mm frame lines, and kind of get an auto crop.
If i would get a 50mm, it would probably be one that offers more than just 10mm difference, maybe a nice Zeiss 1.5 Sonnar, to make it more distinct from my current lens.

Or should i just crop and shut up. Will this greatly effect quality in printing?

Cheers, I am still a beginner so please tell me if you have experienced something similar!
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #2
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
Well, I would just step in a step closer... problem solved.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #3
Gary E
Registered User
 
Gary E's Avatar
 
Gary E is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 342
The 40mm Summicron-C or Rokkor version is by far the best value out there as far as Leica glass goes; I know the Rokkor is by Minolta but it makes no difference.

I use both 50 and 40, and the 50 is my 2nd most used FL. I'd say it's different enough to merit a separate lens, but like jsrocket said you could just step on foot forward and get the 50 perspective from your 40.
__________________
VC Bessa R3a & Leica M4-2
Yashica D TLR
Assorted unRF SLR's
Hoping for FF Fuji or any other FF ILC digital for that matter

For Pete's sake, they're all good. Just get out there and shoot with what you've got!
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #4
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
Thanks for your replies.
I would rather not take that extra step. I feel it would change the whole situation, I would be in peoples face too much. I am getting quite close as it is, often moving closer to them already. It might sound strange to you guys, but then I'd rather get a 50mm.

For me the only alternative seems to be cropping. Reading the posts here on this forum about cropping was quite interesting BTW. Though I sometimes feel a bit restraint to crop, because i am a bit of a purist when it comes to shooting, I generally don't mind to crop of some ugly corners. I just worry if it makes a difference when it comes to printing, which I want to do soon, but not by myself.

Maybe I should just get the cheapest 2nd hand 50mm available and see how I like it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #5
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by zwarte_kat View Post
Maybe I should just get the cheapest 2nd hand 50mm available and see how I like it.
Might be the best idea. There is no one right way to do things... do what works for you.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #6
retnull
Registered User
 
retnull is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
Yes, 40mm to 50mm can be a big difference, especially if you frequently shoot at close distance. Try a cheap 50!
  Reply With Quote

Ok
Old 04-12-2011   #7
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
Ok

Okay cheers. No nobody seems to mention cropping, so I will try a 50, haha!
Now it's just a matter of finding a cheap one.

Or maybe I will make a crazy jump and go straight for the ZM sonnar. Just got another cheap ($200) 40mm, the Nokton SC, and I LOVE the smooth 1.4 rendering. Maybe I can even step it up with a Sonnar.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #8
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
where did you find a cv 40 for 200 bucks?
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2011   #9
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
Second hand store in Tokyo, where I buy pretty much everything (don't have a credit card, so online is out of the question for me).
I should add that it has some fungus spots (or something) inside, which lowered the price. I always buy the fungus lenses, cheaper and I never noticed anything.

So I love fungus, well, in my lenses at least

Usually the prices are higher in that store than 2nd hand online, I think.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2011   #10
thomthom
Registered User
 
thomthom's Avatar
 
thomthom is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
zwarte kat i'm in the same boat as you.
i have the m6 0.85 2 with a summicron 40mm
i'm thinking of getting a 50mm as well to get closer shots.
many people say just take one more step but the closest focus on the 40 is 0.8meters and i always want to go a little tighter.
i'm looking for either a hexanon or summicron DR
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2011   #11
Pherdinand
5000 & call it a day!
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 36
Posts: 7,072
cropping shall do just fine. It increases effective grain a bit, decreases sharpness a bit, in theory - only to be seen if you print large, though.
Stepping closer changes perspective. Cropping does not.

Although there is some truth in Capa's statement that, 'if your photos are not good enough, it means you were not close enough' (or stg like that).
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2011   #12
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,919
How does a 40mm CV already have fungus? :0
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2011   #13
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
40 plus a 75 is a great combo...
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Fungus
Old 04-13-2011   #14
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
Fungus

@jsrockit
Don't know, but there were white spots inside. I am translating the word for "fungus" here from one non-native language to the other BTW. I might be off on what it is exactly.
Anyway, it made it cheaper. I really love the lens. It made me appreciate softer pictures more, before I was more focussed on sharpness. If you look at my flickr, you can kind of see that turning point. For me a soft 100 ASA really shows the distinct style of film when compared to digital (I know, photoshop can make everything, but most people try to make their "mega zoom lens auto focussed 2.8 blur" portraits only sharper).

I guess I love film photography because it persuades you more to look for your own style. I am still in the beginning of that process, and it is wonderful.
  Reply With Quote

75
Old 04-13-2011   #15
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
75

Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
40 plus a 75 is a great combo...
Never really thought about a 75. What are you using the 75 for, exactly? I have a 90 (also fungus haha), but I hardly use it. is it for shoulder shots? Or are you still able to get some surroundings?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-13-2011   #16
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
75 is sort of multi purpose, good for street work, portraits, makes it easier to isolate a subject than a 50 but can still offer some of the surroundings.
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2011   #17
PCStudio
Registered User
 
PCStudio's Avatar
 
PCStudio is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: FLa / MD / NJ
Posts: 73
75 mm is too hard for young guys
..

Last edited by PCStudio : 04-14-2011 at 09:31.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2011   #18
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCStudio View Post
75 is too hard for young guys
..
what does that mean?
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2011   #19
PCStudio
Registered User
 
PCStudio's Avatar
 
PCStudio is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: FLa / MD / NJ
Posts: 73
photographers who just started - in love with wide angle lenses

Last edited by PCStudio : 04-14-2011 at 08:06.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-15-2011   #20
mcaplin
Registered User
 
mcaplin is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 18
How about a Jupiter 8 - dirt cheap sonnar 50 which is very capable.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2011   #21
zwarte_kat
Registered User
 
zwarte_kat is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCStudio View Post
75 mm is too hard for young guys
..
Saying that will probably make me buy one
Seriously though, I am considering it now, the 75mm heliar 1.8 looks great.
Pricey though, no 2nd hand to find yet.

For now I settled on a second hand Bessa R3a. I know, I make no sense.
Love the 1:1 viewfinder.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:34.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.