Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Film / Developing / Chemistry

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Pushing Tri-X to 1600...advice?
Old 02-24-2011   #1
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 997
Pushing Tri-X to 1600...advice?

I'm traveling to The Big Easy this Saturday, and I'm just taking the M6, 35mm Zeiss lens, and Tri-X. I'm sure I'll want fast film at some point, but since I didn't plan very far ahead all I have is Tri-X.

I'd like to see examples and hear experiences (and advice) of pushing Tri-X to 1600.

Thanks.

----David.
__________________
My Tumblr site
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #2
David67
Registered User
 
David67 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
Rodinal 1/50, 18.5mn.
Works well for me. Grainy but surprisingly not too much, just in a nice way.

http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=3370...00+trix&m=text
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #3
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 997
Looks good, David. Thanks for taking the time to chime in.
__________________
My Tumblr site
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #4
xwhatsit
Registered User
 
xwhatsit's Avatar
 
xwhatsit is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 351
D76 does it quite well, 13.25 minutes 1:1 as per the Massive Dev Chart (and Kodak's sheet) works for me. Microphen gives it a lot more shadow detail though, and grain seems smoother.

At one point the Massive Dev chart gave way too high numbers for Tri-X pushed in Microphen. I found 12 minutes 1:0 worked very well for me.

The only pushed Tri-X shot I have handy right now is actually at 3200 (D76, 1:1, 16 minutes). It's daylight, so helping things a bit, but it still surprised me how well it did, especially in terms of grain:


Last edited by xwhatsit : 06-06-2011 at 04:05.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #5
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,267
DDX or Microphen give the highest true ISO speeds, but EI 1600 involves more contrast and emptier shadows than I like. Stick with 1000 and you're only looking at 1/3 stop push in either.

Then again, experimenting in pushing with irreplaceable shots is a bit rash. The further you push, the more experimenting you need to do. Stick with 1000 and again, it'll be easier.

Alternatively, buy some faster film when you're there: must be possible.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #6
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 997
Xwhatsit, nice shot...the push looks good with plenty of light.

Roger...good advice, although I'll really be surprised to find any 1600 or 3200 film downtown in New Orleans without spending half the day. Luckily, no irreplaceable shots here...just farting around near Mardi Gras!
__________________
My Tumblr site
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #7
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,846
here's a link for tri-x in diafine at iso 100,200,400,800, 1600, 3200

http://retro.ms11.net/diafinemedium.jpg
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #8
Chris101
I'm seeing double!
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,625
HC110 dilution b for 15 or 16 minutes at 68F:

__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #9
Riccis
Registered User
 
Riccis is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 413
You will find samples all over my blog.

Enjoy!
__________________
Riccis

web. www.riccisvalladares.com
blog. www.riccisblog.com
flickr. www.flickr.com/photos/riccis
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #10
Dave Jenkins
Loose Canon
 
Dave Jenkins's Avatar
 
Dave Jenkins is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Beautiful Northwest Georgia Mountains
Posts: 335
Really, really nice, Chris.

I used to use Acufine (is it still available?) and Diafine. Diafine worked very well for me and was my standard developer for some years.
__________________
Dave Jenkins

My new book: Georgia: A Backroads Portrait www.blurb.com/books/2390260
Architecture and People: www.davidbjenkins.com
Weddings: www.davejenkinsphotography.com
My best-selling book (28,000+ copies): Rock City Barns: A Passing Era: http://tinyurl.com/22bcws
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #11
Dave Jenkins
Loose Canon
 
Dave Jenkins's Avatar
 
Dave Jenkins is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Beautiful Northwest Georgia Mountains
Posts: 335
Riccis, congratulations on your article in Rangefinder.
__________________
Dave Jenkins

My new book: Georgia: A Backroads Portrait www.blurb.com/books/2390260
Architecture and People: www.davidbjenkins.com
Weddings: www.davejenkinsphotography.com
My best-selling book (28,000+ copies): Rock City Barns: A Passing Era: http://tinyurl.com/22bcws
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #12
flanil
Registered User
 
flanil is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8
here's mine with hc110 dil B @ 16mins 45 secs @ 20c

http://www.flickr.com/photos/buluidong/5366306800/

and the rest of my other pictures are all tri-x 400 @ 1600 too.. i dont have much time to go out and shoot during the day and i just cant refrain myself from firing them shutters hahaha.. so yeah.. trix rated at 1600 all the way
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #13
Turtle
Registered User
 
Turtle is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,468
I would go for Microphen, DDX or dilute Xtol. Try Xtol 1+2 for about 25 mins (depending on scene) at 20 degs C at an EI of 800 with agitation at the beginning (30 secs), 1/3 way and 2/3 way (three inversions each) through the total time. You'll be amazed how much speed you gain in the shadows by cutting out almost all the agitation. I find the results miles better than normal agitation but controlling highlights while giving shadows a real kick in speed. Not one for when you have smooth sky tones as you can get some uneven development but you will never see any issue with normal low light, night, or indoor scenes etc. I never have anyway.

IMHO, 1600 is a bridge too far for TriX unless your original scene is as flat as a pancake i.e. a couple of stops of range.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1543'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by Turtle : 02-25-2011 at 03:57.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #14
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
Diafine. This situation & Tri-X is where it shines. I usually use 1250 but 1600 will work.





William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #15
presspass
filmshooter
 
presspass is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 387
I have had good luck with Xtol 1:1 and 1:3 as well as Diafine. If you use Diafine, follow the agitation recommendations on the box - and be gentle. Too much or too harsh gets huge grain. I have also done 1600 and 3200 with HC110 dilution H - a bit sharper but the grain is more pronounced. Right now, I'm having great luck with TriX at 800 done in Xtol 1:1 at 68 degrees F and 13 minutes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #16
calebk
Registered User
 
calebk is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 99
Tri-X in HC-110(B) for 15 min 15 sec. Agitations initially 30s, and every two minutes thereafter for 10s each cycle. I've been doing this for about two months now with consistently good results:






  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #17
mathomas
Registered User
 
mathomas's Avatar
 
mathomas is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by wlewisiii View Post
Diafine. This situation & Tri-X is where it shines. I usually use 1250 but 1600 will work.





William
+1, and a few of mine @1250:







  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #18
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
Nice, Mike. I especially like the guitars & the fountain with silhouettes. Thank you!

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #19
Chris101
I'm seeing double!
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,625
Thanks Dave! I'm seeing a lot of nicely pushed stuff in this thread.
__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #20
imush
Registered User
 
imush is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 255
Rodinal stand 1:100 always works for me...



Tri-X @1600, Rodinal 1:100, 90 minutes, no agitation.
__________________
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2011   #21
flanil
Registered User
 
flanil is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8
PUSH FOR THE WIN heheehe ,)
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #22
Turtle
Registered User
 
Turtle is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,468
I don't wish to be cruel, but many of the shots here show why not to push this film so hard if you can possibly avoid it. Many have either empty black voids where shadow detail should be (thats bec there is not detail in the neg) of flat muddy dark greys because efforts have been made to prevent these detail free black blocks being printed down, but in the process showing that it is an underexposed neg being printed. Others have seriously blown highlights.

There is no such thing as a free lunch and I feel that 1600 is actually a modest push for Tmax 3200 or D3200, never mind TriX! When you have no shadow in the neg you have that horrible decision to make: muddy dark grey or detail free black void and neither make for good prints.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1543'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #23
maajka
Registered User
 
maajka is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Age: 30
Posts: 48
So what do you do when you need ISO 800 or 1600? With my limited darkroom knowledge, you would either underexpose at 400 and try to fix in darkroom with high contrast filter/paper, or shoot at 1/8 or 1/4.

By the way a lot of great pictures here. I'm gonna be a best man at a wedding in may, and I'll try to take a few photos if I get a chance. I thought about arista premium and D-76 at 800 or 1600 and I see some nice pictures here with that combination.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #24
jimrohrer
Registered User
 
jimrohrer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 38
I've had awesome results with Diafine at EI 1600... it's a pretty foolproof combination.
-Jim
__________________
Jim Rohrer
www.jimrohrerphotography.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #25
David_Manning
Registered User
 
David_Manning's Avatar
 
David_Manning is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 997
Thank you all for the input and examples. One thing is for sure...I'm on the road now and will be shooting Tri-X pushed to 1600 tomorrow in New Orleans.

BTW...any other RFF shooters in New Orleans tomorrow? I'm sure I'll be taking occasional "hurricane" breaks

David.
__________________
My Tumblr site

Last edited by David_Manning : 02-25-2011 at 16:59. Reason: Spelling
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:02.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.