Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M -- Leica CL

Leica M -- Leica CL This forum is about all things Leica CL, the little M mount camera that could.

View Poll Results: Was my first Leica a CL?
Yes, my first Leica was a CL 24 30.00%
No, I started my Leica experiance on another M 37 46.25%
My first Leica wasn't an M or a CL 12 15.00%
I still don't have a Leica. 7 8.75%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

How Many of Us Started Our Leice Experiance on a CL?
Old 12-06-2012   #1
filmtwit
Registered User
 
filmtwit's Avatar
 
filmtwit is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,805
How Many of Us Started Our Leice Experiance on a CL?

Was your first Leica a CL?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #2
lam
Dave
 
lam's Avatar
 
lam is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 939
I wonder if he could narrow it even further as to say, first lens Jupiter-8?? This was my first Leica and first combo.. I loved the results from it, and still do!
I love CL's I have one now still.


Leica CL, Jupiter-8 by lamlux.net, on Flickr
__________________
film tumblr | website | flickr | twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #3
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,773
Yes, my first Leica was a Leitz Minolta CL that I bought new in 1978 at Camera Barn. (Who knew that I would be working there 6 months later!). I owned that CL for a really short time. It just wasn't robust enough for me. I traded it in at Ken Hansen's old shop on 34th Street for a well used Leica DS M3 with a Canon 50/1.8 Serenar. To me, that M3 really was my first Leica.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #4
Vickko
Registered User
 
Vickko is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 54
Posts: 2,749
I think the CL was my second Leica. M4 was first, then CL, then M5. Those were the days.
__________________
Vick

35mm (film and digital)
Film only for 6x6cm, 6x9cm & 4x5in
BW darkroom to 4x5in
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #5
Montag006
Registered User
 
Montag006 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Across the bay from Tampa
Posts: 47
I started with a Leicaflex SL - long gone! - then an early M3.. gone too, D'oh!
__________________
RF - ca '62 M2
VF - Olympus Pen D
SLR(s) - Nikon F2 and Olympus Pen FV
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #6
Chris Bail
Regular Guy
 
Chris Bail's Avatar
 
Chris Bail is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Near Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 314
IIIa was my first. CL was second.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #7
sparrow6224
Registered User
 
sparrow6224's Avatar
 
sparrow6224 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York NY
Posts: 935
Of course this is a skewed poll -- well they're all skewed but this one particularly so -- because really mainly CL owners/users will be drawn to it. I got my first Leica, a CL of course, from the counterman at the old Mill Luncheonette on upper Broadway, in 1982. Iw as so young and naive I didn't realize it was hot. But it had to have been. With 40mm f/2 Summicron. Since lost in a divorce. But I have my own replacement now. It's a great camera on which to mount the VC 21/4 (with viewfinder of course). That set looks fabulous together.
__________________
Best,
Vince



http://www.flickr.com/photos/commodiusvicus/
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #8
ElectroWNED
Registered User
 
ElectroWNED is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ithaca
Posts: 493
CL w/ Nokton 40... sold it after one roll.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #9
burancap
Registered User
 
burancap's Avatar
 
burancap is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Carolina
Age: 49
Posts: 1,470
CL is my most recent...
__________________
Jeff @ flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2012   #10
filmtwit
Registered User
 
filmtwit's Avatar
 
filmtwit is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,805
Hah!
I would say it was skewed only if the originator had also started on a CL!


Quote:
Originally Posted by sparrow6224 View Post
Of course this is a skewed poll -- well they're all skewed but this one particularly so -- because really mainly CL owners/users will be drawn to it. I got my first Leica, a CL of course, from the counterman at the old Mill Luncheonette on upper Broadway, in 1982. Iw as so young and naive I didn't realize it was hot. But it had to have been. With 40mm f/2 Summicron. Since lost in a divorce. But I have my own replacement now. It's a great camera on which to mount the VC 21/4 (with viewfinder of course). That set looks fabulous together.
BTW - my rangefinder was a CLE!
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #11
siracusa
Registered User
 
siracusa's Avatar
 
siracusa is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 345
My first Leica was an SLR. No! I tell a lie - it was a minilux. The lens was amazing, and thats what got me into Leicas. I then went down the SLR route, first with a Leicaflex. That camera felt amazing to use, but when the meter packed in I sold it for an R series SLR. Again, the lens quality kept me hooked. I used that along with a battered IIIC, realised I preferred using rangefinders and then began saving for an M2. I never used the SLR once I had an M2 but I still kept it for a fair old while because the Summicron-r 50 on it had seen better days but produced amazing images, and I eventually sold it a couple of years back. So I'm afraid I don't fit any of the voting options - as my first Leica experience wasn't CL, wasn't M, and wasn't a non-Leica non-CL.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #12
ruby.monkey
Registered User
 
ruby.monkey is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Garden of England
Age: 44
Posts: 3,443
I started with an M3 + 50mm Summicron; and whatever else comes and goes, I think I'll be finishing with it.

Never tried a CL but every time one comes up for sale, a little part of me itches to reach for my wallet.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #13
johannielscom
Off to Nikon dSLR, MF
 
johannielscom's Avatar
 
johannielscom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GRQ 187 17km
Posts: 6,471
When I created an account here, I choose 'CLE-RF' as a handle. For obvious reasons!
__________________
Check me out at

www.johanniels.com

See ya.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #14
menthel
Not very good...
 
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 36
Posts: 318
M6 and now an M9 too. I have not handled a CL but they look a bit small to me. The M6 fits me perfectly.
__________________
Jim Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #15
NeeZee
Registered User
 
NeeZee is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Age: 35
Posts: 439
"My first Leica wasn't a Leica or a CL"
Logically, that's not even possible. Also, what do I vote if my first (and still only) Leica was a IIIf? Strange poll, indeed...
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #16
ruby.monkey
Registered User
 
ruby.monkey is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Garden of England
Age: 44
Posts: 3,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeeZee View Post
"My first Leica wasn't a Leica or a CL"
Logically, that's not even possible. Also, what do I vote if my first (and still only) Leica was a IIIf? Strange poll, indeed...
Starting with a D-LUX?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #17
NeeZee
Registered User
 
NeeZee is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Age: 35
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruby.monkey View Post
Starting with a D-LUX?
yeah, or a leica fake...
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #18
thejameskendall
Registered User
 
thejameskendall's Avatar
 
thejameskendall is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 116
Almost, but then i changed for a M6 at the last moment. the longer EBL won out. but i might get one when i've settled into my lenses and have an M8. maybe this time next year. love the size and the AE.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------
M6, Mamiya 7, D700, Yashica T5, X100
Website: cargocollective/kendall
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #19
giellaleafapmu
Registered User
 
giellaleafapmu is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmtwit View Post
Was your first Leica a CL?
No it was a R3 Mot (I am a veiw camera and SLR guy mostly) but my first RF Leica was indeed a CL, and it is still one of my favorite cameras today.

GLF
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1808'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #20
MISH
Registered User
 
MISH's Avatar
 
MISH is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 524
as stated by someone above the Cl was not my first Leica but so far it has been my last ........I only wish I had given in to temptation a little sooner
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #21
boomguy57
Registered User
 
boomguy57's Avatar
 
boomguy57 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 31
Posts: 866
I started on a Minolta CL as my first leica. I didn't have it long as I wanted more accurate focusing and, frankly, I hate the way you load the film. Taking the whole thing apart was cumbersome.
__________________
Website ~ Blog ~ Flickr

"Only a Sith deals in absolutes." - Obi-Wan Kenobi
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #22
malkmata
Registered User
 
malkmata's Avatar
 
malkmata is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 519
I had a CL in the early 1990's but didn't realized it's true potential because I was primarily an Nikon SLR shooter then. Shooting mostly telephotos and zooms. Sold it with two lenses to finance a Nikon F100 when it came out. Now, since I came back to film from digital in 2008, I've been shooting mostly with rangefinders including my two Ms.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #23
zuiko85
Registered User
 
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 821
Looked at the Cl when I decided to fulfill lifelong dream for a Leica M kit. It just seemed to be too close in price to a an M2 or M4-2 to save much money. And of course the lenses, CV and Leica would be a major expense and then there would be an extra viewfinder for a 35mm lens, something I had already bought because of a very good price. In fact, if not for a deal falling into my lap on a couple of CV lenses I would not have considered getting an M kit. Kind of backed into the system, lenses first, then looked for a body. Anyone else get into the Leica M system by buying lenses first?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #24
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is online now
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,111
Hardly. They hadn't been invented then. And once they were invented, their impact was very modest. Most Leica users of that era dismissed them as rather nasty little cameras. Those who could afford 'real' Leicas dismissed them as not 'real', and those who couldn't afford them dismissed them because they couldn't afford them.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2012   #25
sepiareverb
-
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,139
M7 & 50/2 kit here.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.