 |
D76 shelf life |
 |
01-13-2011
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
wizard717 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern N.J.
Age: 66
Posts: 32
|
D76 shelf life
I have a little more then a half Gal. of D76 working solution.
It's about 4 month old and has been stored in a sealed black plastic container in a very cool basement work room.
I have a few rolls of of Arista 400 and a few rolls of Legacy 400 I'd like to process.
Do you think the D76 is still usable?
__________________
Dom
Rangerfinders-- Fed-3, Zorki-4, Kiev-4A, Electro-35, Hanimex Amphibian
SLR-- Praktica-MTL3, Yashica-Electro-X, TLR--Accuraflex
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#2
|
|
Ah looky looky
ibcrewin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 753
|
I think the package says 6months in a sealed container and 2 months in an unsealed one. I say use it. If you're not 100% sure, shoot a sacrificial roll and find out!
__________________
Shooting, developing, and scanning more film in 2013! My Flickr Gallery
Bessa-R w/ J8 lens, Lubitel 2, Rebel XT, Elan 7e, Konica C35, Olympus Mju
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
jmcd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 602
|
With long storage time D-76 changes pH (becomes more alkaline) and for a given development time, contrast increases.
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#4
|
|
Shooter of Film...
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,767
|
It should still be good and if you really want to know do what ibcrewin says and shoot a not-so-important roll and give it a go...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
CK Dexter Haven is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 993
|
Why risk it? I recently used some old ID-11/D-76 and was quite disappointed by the results. Sealed, cool, all that. Based on that, i'm now only using 1L packets and mixing what i need for that particular day. There's nothing worse than having a shot on a negative you really like and being let down by the technical aspect. Well, there are many things worse, but you know what i mean.
Developer is cheap. Images aren't.
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
MRohlfing is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wien, Austria
Age: 59
Posts: 322
|
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#7
|
|
Ah looky looky
ibcrewin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 753
|
Quick threadjack here: Page 7 says
To extend the useful capacity of D-76 Developer diluted
1:1—when processing two 36-exposure rolls in a 16-ounce
tank—increase the recommended time by about 10 percent
does that mean you can reuse it once if you increase the recommended time?
__________________
Shooting, developing, and scanning more film in 2013! My Flickr Gallery
Bessa-R w/ J8 lens, Lubitel 2, Rebel XT, Elan 7e, Konica C35, Olympus Mju
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#8
|
|
I've chosen darkness
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zone I
Posts: 1,107
|
No; what they're saying is that normally in that amount of developer diluted 1+1 you should only develop one film, but you can get away with two if you increase the development time. If you re-use you'll get no image; there aren't enough chemicals in the solution to develop another 160 square inches of film.
Marty
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#9
|
|
Shooter of Film...
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freakscene
No; what they're saying is that normally in that amount of developer diluted 1+1 you should only develop one film, but you can get away with two if you increase the development time. If you re-use you'll get no image; there aren't enough chemicals in the solution to develop another 160 square inches of film.
Marty
|
I going to have to disagree with this statement... 
I've used D-76 diluted @ 1:1 twice...with a slight increase in developing time and all was/is fine... 
These days I'm using Rodinal either at 1+50 or 1+100...mostly due to a one time use and I mix it up just before developing...
I don't have to worry about storing D-76 and if it's still good...
These days it's either Rodinal or HC-110...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#10
|
|
Ah looky looky
ibcrewin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freakscene
No; what they're saying is that normally in that amount of developer diluted 1+1 you should only develop one film, but you can get away with two if you increase the development time. If you re-use you'll get no image; there aren't enough chemicals in the solution to develop another 160 square inches of film.
Marty
|
But if I use a 2 roll tank i'm also putting in 2x the amount of chemistry. I didn't see anything in the text that said I need x amount of developer per roll.
__________________
Shooting, developing, and scanning more film in 2013! My Flickr Gallery
Bessa-R w/ J8 lens, Lubitel 2, Rebel XT, Elan 7e, Konica C35, Olympus Mju
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Ronald M is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,652
|
Full sealed containers are perfect for 6 months. If your plastic does not breath, and many do, it is good. If it has more than a slight brown tinge which is there as mixed, it is no good or at least not perfect.
I never use partial bottles as they are un predictable after even a few days and I don`t care what Kodak says. I use 4 oz bottles and scratch mix a quart at a time.
I have run very careful weekly tests for 6 months and stability is perfect. Partial bottles are DANGEROUS.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-13-2011
|
#12
|
|
I've chosen darkness
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zone I
Posts: 1,107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibcrewin
But if I use a 2 roll tank i'm also putting in 2x the amount of chemistry. I didn't see anything in the text that said I need x amount of developer per roll.
|
"You can develop one 135-3 roll (80 square inches)
in 473 mL (16 ounces) or two rolls together in 946 mL
(one quart) of diluted developer. If you process one
135-36 roll in a 237 mL (8-ounce) tank or two 135-36 rolls
in a 473 mL (16-ounce) tank, increase the development time by 10 percent (see the following tables)."
I have good sensitometric data that shows that if you re-use D76 1+1 you get much thinner negs and that the developer has exhausted itself and passed the useful point of activity. D76 works by a superadditive relationship between metol and hydroquinone in the presence of sulfite - silver salts need an electron to develop to silver. The combination is superadditive under these circumstances because hydroquinone regenerates the metol that adsorbs to the silver salts and this regeneration allows it to continue developing. The hydroquinone stops regenerating the metol, development stops. This seems to be what happens if you over-use D76, but measuring exactly what happens is tricky.
Marty
|
|
|
|
 |
01-13-2011
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
zerobuttons is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard717
I have a little more then a half Gal. of D76 working solution.
It's about 4 month old and has been stored in a sealed black plastic container in a very cool basement work room.
I have a few rolls of of Arista 400 and a few rolls of Legacy 400 I'd like to process.
Do you think the D76 is still usable?
|
Since D76 chemically should be the same as ID-11, I take it that you can see it right away, when you pour the developer into a clear measuring container, if itīs good or bad.
I have found that my stock solution ID-11 turns dark yellow if it has been mixed up more than 5-6 months ago. So far, I have assumed that this is a sign that I shouldnīt use it.
If anyone here knows more about this colour shift in ID-11 and whether or not it can take place with D76, please comment.
|
|
|
|
01-15-2011
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Costo Kim is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
I have a little more then a half Gal. of D76 working solution.
It's about 4 month old and has been stored in a sealed black plastic container in a very cool basement work room.
|
recently I had exactly the same situation
and I had to increase dev time ~10-15% b/c first batch came out slighty underdeveloped
(I diluted 1:1 just before usage)
|
|
|
|
01-15-2011
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Fotohuis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 678
|
Crappy developer is the worst thing you can do. If 3,8 ltr./1 gallon is too much take the 1 ltr. packing of D76/ID11/or Fomadon P W37.
Putting a stock away for more then the regular time is asking for problems and non-consistency.
Good liquid developer concentrates in storage are Rodinal and HC-110. This is another way to go.
__________________
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42. |
|
|