Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Film / Developing / Chemistry

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

How many films do you develop at one time?
Old 01-13-2011   #1
ibcrewin
Ah looky looky
 
ibcrewin's Avatar
 
ibcrewin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 753
How many films do you develop at one time?

I have a 4 reel, 2 reel and 1 reel tank. If I fall behind, I go for the 4 reel tank. The one reel for one off rolls, but I use the two reel tank most often.
__________________
Shooting, developing, and scanning more film in 2013! My Flickr Gallery


Bessa-R w/ J8 lens, Lubitel 2, Rebel XT, Elan 7e, Konica C35, Olympus Mju
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2011   #2
arunrajmohan
Registered User
 
arunrajmohan's Avatar
 
arunrajmohan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 132
I have 1, 2, and 4 too. But I never process more than 2. I always feel something jinxes my films when do more than two. That is even if I have 10-15 rolls to develop.

Arun
__________________
Rangefinders: M3; M4-P; Bessa R4M; Bronica RF645; Graflex Crown Graphic; Canonet 28; Olympus XA; Lens: 21mm Color-Skopar f4; 35mm Color-Skopar f2.5 PII; 40mm Nokton f1.4; 50mm Summarit-M f2.5; 90mm Summarit-M f2.5
flickr.com/photos/maggots
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2011   #3
ruby.monkey
Registered User
 
ruby.monkey is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Garden of England
Age: 43
Posts: 2,863
I have tank space and hanging clips for up to four rolls of 135, or two of 120. Nowadays I tend to limit myself to two rolls at a time - having small babies in the house means that the time I can devote to developing, scanning, and post-processing, is necessarily limited.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2011   #4
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 69
Posts: 5,101
For the sake of consistency I always do 5 reel batches. Paterson tanks, 1500 ml of developer and 60 seconds interval agitation. With smaller tanks you most likely have to increase agitation cycles to every 30 seconds.
I like eliminating things that can affect the outcome of developing - and doing it this way I know that neither agitation nor dilution will affect how the negs turn out.
Ok, sometimes it is a bit of a chore to shoot 5 rolls - but there is usually something that I can "waste" the 5th roll on (macro, a walk to the coffee shop or just around the place I live).
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2011   #5
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
 
drewbarb's Avatar
 
drewbarb is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,351
For personal work in 35mm, I usually process four or eight rolls of 35mm at a time in one tank. Sometimes, if I have a lot of film to process I'll load two tanks and run them 60 seconds apart, so I can basically do 16 rolls of 35mm at once. Occasionally I'll process only one or two rolls at a time, but this always feels like a waste of time and chemistry.

I used to process film at a small boutique b&w lab in NYC; I now run my own small lab for some of the same clients, and my processing is done the same way. I use baskets that can process 18 rolls of 120 or 220 at a time in deep tanks. When I have big orders I will load up two of these at once and run them in succession- so that once the the first basket goes into the fix, the second goes into the developer. This means I can process up to 36 rolls of 120 or 220 in a single lights-out session which may last 45 minutes to an hour, including time to load the film.

For sheet films I have several different processes, depending upon the format and the quantity I have to process. For 4x5, I'll run 10 sheets at a time in single sheet holders in small tanks, or 24 sheets at a time, in 6 holders which each take 4 sheets at a time- these go in the same deep tanks as the medium format baskets. For film larger than 4x5, I use open trays. With 5x7 and 8x10 film, I try to limit it to no more than 6 sheets at a time in a single tray; larger films really need even fewer sheets at a time. I can process sheet film up to 20x24 inches this way- though I've found that film above 11x14 should really be done one or maybe two sheets at a time. This is slow and tedious stuff, and very expensive- but man, do they look good!
__________________
-drew
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2011   #6
ibcrewin
Ah looky looky
 
ibcrewin's Avatar
 
ibcrewin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruby.monkey View Post
I have tank space and hanging clips for up to four rolls of 135, or two of 120. Nowadays I tend to limit myself to two rolls at a time - having small babies in the house means that the time I can devote to developing, scanning, and post-processing, is necessarily limited.
Oh I soo hear that! I was making prints in the basement once and I heard one of them wailing upstairs. The wife ended up getting her but it definitely throws me off.
__________________
Shooting, developing, and scanning more film in 2013! My Flickr Gallery


Bessa-R w/ J8 lens, Lubitel 2, Rebel XT, Elan 7e, Konica C35, Olympus Mju
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:29.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.