08-08-2012
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,336
|
BTW, Joe, I do have a Canadian M3 - they do exist. But I'll keep that one 
How about a Canon P ? |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#27
|
|
Unsui
Moriturii is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 671
|
Really, to me it sounds like you shouldn't buy any more cameras "for lazy days" as you put it. When you got a lazy day you got to rough it out man and still go for it. Lazying it out ain't going to do you any good but put a hole in your wallet.
But to answer your question; M4-P is my favorite mechanical M. M6 being my favorite with light-meter (haven't tested M7, way too expensive just for A-Priority)
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
venchka is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 67
Posts: 6,095
|
What's not to like?
Wayne
__________________
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest.
Quote:
|
"Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing" K.R.
|
My Gallery
My Blog-Reborn
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,442
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by venchka
What's not to like?
Wayne
|
Dear Wayne,
Size. Weight. Looks. Mechanical complication. Inability to accept several lenses. And -- given the thread title --- an absolute break with tradition.
What's to like?
Cheers,
R. |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
Austerby is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fircombe
Posts: 910
|
What about a Canadian-made M3? I have one and I don't mind at all that it wasn't made in Wetzlar.
__________________
Austerby
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#31
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
|
so many opinions!
very cool and thanks to all.
i think i would rule out the cl and the m5...too controversial for a shy guy like me...  |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,336
|
To counter-balance Thomas (I have 2 M4-P), a picture of my favorite Canadian
With period-correct lens, too |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#33
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
|
lovely machines gents!
the m4-p would be nice to use my 75 on and have fl for it.
40/75 combo...nice!
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
Murchu is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ireland
Age: 34
Posts: 622
|
I find an M3 + 50mm simply heaven, for me. The other M's just give me more flexibility with additional framelines, with perfection being an M3 + 50mm, and M6 for 35mm and everything else. Seems like something with framelines for your existing lenses would suit you best. M4-P always seemed a fine camera to me, and if it has the framelines you need, then go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
venchka is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 67
Posts: 6,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
so many opinions!
very cool and thanks to all.
i think i would rule out the cl and the m5...too controversial for a shy guy like me... |
That would be your loss.
Those of us who use them know better.
Wayne
Ps: Nobody has mentioned the obvious pinacle of tradition: M4.
__________________
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest.
Quote:
|
"Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing" K.R.
|
My Gallery
My Blog-Reborn
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,826
|
I've only just discovered this thread and I'm stunned! 
Good decision to have the occasional dally with film IMO Joe ... though personally I wouldn't be going past an M6 as I like an in camera meter.
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
flickr ... currently all images from the DP2M
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,204
|
An M2 with a CV Meter ll for me. Plus col. Summicron.
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#38
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith
I've only just discovered this thread and I'm stunned!
Good decision to have the occasional dally with film IMO Joe ... though personally I wouldn't be going past an M6 as I like an in camera meter. |
can't afford an m6...plus i'm pretty good at reading the light values... |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,826
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
can't afford an m6...plus i'm pretty good at reading the light values...
|
So am I but sometimes it really matters to get it right.
I'm actually tentatively thinking about a metered M for a job I have coming up in a month or two ... kind of wish I hadn't sold my Ikon now!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
flickr ... currently all images from the DP2M
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#40
|
|
Preserving Old Technology
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: secret midwestern underground bunker
Posts: 3,420
|
I think a traditional M means one made in the old traditional way: each technician sits at a bench and hand fits each part, working with a file and a tiny hammer (I guess it's tiny). So that would mean an M2, M3, or M4. Maybe an M5, if a built-in meter can be considered traditional. At least, it should be one made before they started leaving parts out and putting plastic in. OK, I shoot mainly with M6, M7, MP these days . . . I just don't think they are very traditional.
__________________
“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.”
--John Ruskin
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#41
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
|
i'm not religious about it...the traditional part...the price is the key factor for me...so i'm thinking an ugly m2 or m4-p or thereabouts...
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 798
|
Nothing wrong with an ugly M2. Mine has been through a war and looks it.
I like it like that. No worrying about scratching it and babying it.
I'm starting to prefer 'ugly' gear.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#43
|
|
... likes film.
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,452
|
M4-2 / M4-P ... maybe the best value for the CAD... I have and like both. |
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 4,653
|
My Skopar 50/2.5 rocks on an M4-2, which also has that Canadian vibe. But then it rocks on an M2, too.
Edit: Of course, having said all that, and knowing how you love the Rollei 40 Sonnar, if I were you I'd buy an M3 and never look back.
__________________
Steve
M2, M4-2, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
XD-11, X700, and assorted MD Rokkor lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS
My Flickr
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2012
|
#45
|
|
Registered User
JustPlainBill is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mount Pleasant, PA USA
Age: 73
Posts: 90
|
Hi,
Since you want to use your 40 mm Sonnar I suggest a Leica CL or a Minolta CLE.
JustPlainBill
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:25. |
|
|
