Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Fixed Lens RF

Fixed Lens RF This forum is dedicated to the numerous and popular fixed lens rangefinders, including but not limited to the Canon Canonets, Konica III and S series, Minoltas, Ricohs, Vivitars, and so many others. Note fixed lens Olympus , Yashicas, Argus and Retina have separate forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 01-25-2013   #51
Russ
Registered User
 
Russ's Avatar
 
Russ is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the Couve
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTrop View Post
The Himatic has the exact same (rumor has it, Cosina-built) body as the Konica. There isn't any plastic on the exterior of the body as far as I can tell.

That is very true. But the build quality is quite good.
__________________
Russ (Kiron Kid)

"A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2013   #52
ColSebastianMoran
Registered User
 
ColSebastianMoran's Avatar
 
ColSebastianMoran is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 890
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTrop View Post
GIII locks the trigger when it meters out of range. Deal breaker imo.
The OP wanted to shoot wide open. On the G III, with its shutter preferred auto, that would mean shooting in manual. That might work out quite well for your intended use.

I'll second the suggestion for the GX. Excellent camera, ASA 800, and (unlike the CC) a real iris for the aperture.
__________________
Col. Sebastian Moran, ret. (not really)

SLR, dSLR, and compact RF's. Black Yashica RFs; Nikon & Contax/Yashica SLRs; Nikon digital.
Where did all these cameras come from?
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2013   #53
dbarnes
Registered User
 
dbarnes is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 245
Used to own a black 7sii and a chrome GIII/QL. The Minolta worked great; the Canon jammed as soon as I replaced its light seals, so I have more experience with the Minolta. I found it light and sharp and the controls were easy to use. The Canon was heavier and I remember that either the aperture or shutter speed ring was rather hard to grasp, the ring being thin.

Neither viewfinder holds a candle to a $250 Bessa R body, which is what I moved on to.

But between the 7sii and the GIII/QL, I'd pick the Minolta for its better controls.

FWIW, the black body 7sii is lovely -- but I covered mine up with black masking tape to keep it from getting scratched. Honestly, I might as well have started with a much cheaper chrome body.

Your mileage may vary.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blown Away by the Konica Auto S3 NickTrop Other RF 24 10-17-2012 10:20
Lynx 14 vs GSN vs Electro CC (+ Auto S3) NickTrop Yashica RF 28 03-02-2007 09:38
Konica Minolta sees big loss, steps up restructuring bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 26 11-05-2005 10:22
Canon QL17 vs Minolta 7sII - compare? hoot Other RF 1 10-22-2005 05:35
Vivitar ES, Minolta Hi-Matic 7sII and Revue 400 SE Russ Rangefinder Photography Discussion 2 02-03-2005 23:50



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:56.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.