Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-11-2012   #26
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,828
Film, paper, chemistry, Paris.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2012   #27
Sunti
Registered User
 
Sunti is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Francisco bay area
Posts: 136
xpro1 with 35 f/1.4. Spend the rest on a trip.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #28
ramosa
Registered User
 
ramosa is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 915
I'd save it toward an M10.
__________________
Ramosa/Christopher
Leica M9 + 35/50/90
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #29
I Love Film
-
 
I Love Film is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 562
Pay a fraction of my NYC apartment rent with it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #30
ramosa
Registered User
 
ramosa is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Love Film
Pay a fraction of my NYC apartment rent with it.
Good one
__________________
Ramosa/Christopher
Leica M9 + 35/50/90
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #31
I Love Film
-
 
I Love Film is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramosa View Post
Good one
And not joking, either.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #32
jamesbf
Registered User
 
jamesbf is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 54
Would consider paying off debts but most likely go to hong kong!
__________________
_____________
Flickr | Email
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #33
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,194
Gitzo Tripod with Acca-Swiss P0 head with Quick Release System and various plates for my cameras (or an RRS Head, quick release & plates). Epson Printer 3880 or 4900 inkjet printer, Some 35mm, 120 and 220 film and the remainder on a vacation.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
~ M9, M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1 ~ K5IIs
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26672618@N03/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #34
viramati
Registered User
 
viramati is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 80
Smile

I'd buy Greek debt and hope for the best.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #35
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is online now
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 3,101
I'd spend $4000 on a trip and spend $1000 on a 4x5 camera and some film for it, never had one, would love to give it a try some time. If I had to buy a digital camera, then it would be a Sigma SD-1.
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #36
BobYIL
Registered User
 
BobYIL's Avatar
 
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,314
To stick to compact body: The X-Pro1 with native lenses + trip

Size does not matter: The D800/E or 5DIII + lenses.

(For you seem to be rather digital..)
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #37
sahe69
Registered User
 
sahe69's Avatar
 
sahe69 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 445
I might actually go for a used M9. Lenses I already have and lucky to say so, debts have been also paid (for now at least).
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #38
sanmich
The man who shot film
 
sanmich's Avatar
 
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,810
M6+50+35+28+film+scanner.
I don't think there is anything left, but the rest would go on a trip..
__________________
Michael

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)


GAS rehab
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-16-2012   #39
Archiver
Registered User
 
Archiver is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 473
Oooh, I'll play.

The responsible choice: straight into the bank and locked into a fixed term deposit account where I can't touch it for ages. By the time it matures I will have forgotten about it and be pleasantly surprised when notified. Then I'll forget about it again and it will be automatically reinvested. Rinse, repeat.

The digital choice: if I had NO cameras, not just rangefinders, I would get a Ricoh GXR with 28, 50 and M-modules. Buy secondhand CV 15/4.5, Zeiss 28/2.8 and 50/1.5. Whatever is left would go to a Fuji X10 or GRD. This is the most versatile and compact kit I could wish for. Interestingly I am not including the Fuji X100; while I love this camera, just one focal length is not enough for me.

The film choice: get a secondhand M6 TTL or well kept M4-P. Lenses would be secondhand Zeiss 21/4.5 or 25/2.8, CV 35/1.4 and Zeiss 50/1.5 or cheap Summicron 50, type IV or V. And a Contax T3!

The hybrid choice: Ricoh GXR-M module and Leica M4-P. Lenses would be secondhand CV 21/4P, CV 35/1.4 and Summicron 50 type IV. These would become 32/4, 50/1.4 and 75/2 on the GXR. And a Ricoh GRD for those surprise pocket moments!

I don't include the M9 or M8 in this because the cost difference means that I couldn't get a batch of interesting and fun lenses. Now if it was a 10k lottery ticket, that would be a different story!
__________________
~Loving Every Image Captured Always~
Archiver on flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-16-2012   #40
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,140
Pay off my debts.

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-21-2012   #41
x-ray
Registered User
 
x-ray's Avatar
 
x-ray is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN USA
Age: 64
Posts: 2,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by djonesii View Post
Dear RF forum shooters ...

The RD-1 was recently sold .... I'm missing it a bit already.

So, lets say you hit the lottery for 5K!

Assuming you have NO RF CAMERA at this point:

Get an M8 + 35mm Leica lens ( or maybe a 25/40 cv pair)
Get an M9 and find the money for a lens
Sorry, gave up on RF for a reason, get a D800 or
just go on a trip!


Dave
Invest the money, you'll need it later assuming you have no debt.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-21-2012   #42
Vics
Registered User
 
Vics's Avatar
 
Vics is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd View Post
Go on a trip.
Plus One............
__________________
Vic
Leica M3, Contax IIIa, Rollei MX, Nikon F and FM

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

still have the lenses ..... for now
Old 06-21-2012   #43
djonesii
Registered User
 
djonesii is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 375
still have the lenses ..... for now

Well, I did not hit the lottery, but I did sell off the RD-1 as I said, and that is almost exactly what an Oly OM-D set me back.

I am still rangefinder-less (digital) and with the 2X crop factor on the OM-D, my 25 and 40mm are just not what I want to shoot ....

I still have some gear to move around, and it is looking like the rumored D600 will be the next winner!

Any one want to buy a MFDB?

Dave
  Reply With Quote

If I had absolutely no rangefinder gear...
Old 06-21-2012   #44
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 640
If I had absolutely no rangefinder gear...

... and if the $5k was all I had to spend...
hmmm... lemme see: $5k is about 3.9 k€ right now. Does not really sound that much and will not buy my current kit back.

So, I think I would spend:
about 1.0 k€ on a Zeiss Ikon ZI,
about 0.9 k€ on a ZM 28/2.8,
about 0.6 k€ on a ZM 50/2, and
about 1.4 k€ on film and developing (200 rolls of Kentmere 100, 200 rolls of Kentmere 400, plus 8 packs of Xtol).

This would last me roughly 8 years at my current going rate...
__________________
Photon Counter
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25547701@N08/
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.