Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Coffee With Mentors > Tom Abrahamsson of RapidWinder.com

Tom Abrahamsson of RapidWinder.com It is almost never that an inventor improves on a Leica product so that it is better than the original Leica product. Tom holds that distinction with his RapidWinder for Leica M rangefinders -- a bottom mounting baseplate trigger advance. In addition Tom manufacturers other Leica accessories such as his very popular Soft Release and MiniSoftRelease shutter releases. Tom is well known as one of the true Leica rangefinder experts, even by Leica. IMPORTANT READ THIS: CWE Forum hosts have moderation powers within their forum. Please observe copyright laws by not copying and posting their material elsewhere without permission.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-16-2012   #26
helenhill
MoDeRaToR-To Love & Light
 
helenhill's Avatar
 
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog View Post
Some people think veiling flare improves their photographs.
Oh Dear I'm One of those
sometimes Flare can add Atmosphere & can be Coool ...
though I much prefer Vignetting , in particular with the 21 Super Angulon
__________________
flickr

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2012   #27
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is online now
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,223
That's a useful comparo, thanks for posting it. My assessments were just by eyeballing the MTF charts.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-17-2012   #28
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenhill View Post
Oh Dear I'm One of those
sometimes Flare can add Atmosphere & can be Coool ...
though I much prefer Vignetting , in particular with the 21 Super Angulon
Helen, I agree with you 99% of the time. It's rare that I think the flare ruined my photo. I also add vignetting often after the fact.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-17-2012   #29
James6714
Registered User
 
James6714 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
Thank you all for your inputs and lovely pictures.

Very helpful comments from: Tom (always), Semilog, Dektol Dan, and last but not least helen hill (I love your pictures).

I will definitely go for the Biogon.

Regards,
James
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-19-2012   #30
froyd
Registered User
 
froyd's Avatar
 
froyd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 901
I'm a huge fan of the Zeiss look: punchy colors, crisp contrast, no distortions... the reason why I cannot get rid of of the Contax G. However, I'm head over heels for teh Summaron 2.8, especially shot on XP2 at 320. There's so much tonal gradation in the negatives this combo produces that you could mistake it for a bigger format. Simply superb. Sharp enough without the razor's hedge.

I posted some images from this combo here:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...light=summaron
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-19-2012   #31
Shade
Registered User
 
Shade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 400
Inthink both lenses are great, but wasnt there an article discussing about how sharp the sumaron is wide open? Im not sure if I rember correctly but I think one does exist somewhere. But disregarding the fact I believe the summaron has a certain character and so does the biogon. It would be best to try both out and see which one you like better for your style of shooting.
__________________
Www.photopurple.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-19-2012   #32
BobYIL
Registered User
 
BobYIL's Avatar
 
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,321
For B&W film, Summaron tones I like more, as if more gradations from black to white. C-Biogon's contrast is striking, similar to Summicron 35 Asph. Both have almost no distortion, bokeh by the Biogon is buttery smooth. Center sharpness of Summaron and the C-Biogon is almost the same, f2.8 and f5.6 tested; a tiny tad to Summaron's favor. The C-Biogon is superior in the edges/corners. For color and digital the C-Biogon is an outstanding lens.

Not to undermine; Summaron's center sharpness was better than any 35mm lens I have tested including the Summicron Asph and Summicron v1.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.