Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

New Version Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 IN STOCK & SHIPPING
Old 10-21-2016   #1
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 5,328
New Version Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 IN STOCK & SHIPPING

The new retro style version 58/1.4 Nokton's styled similar to the classic Nikkors of the 1960's is in stock and shipping.
They are beautifully made like classic collectible lenses.









The image quality of the Nokton 58mm is exceptional, probably the best normal lens 1.4 in Nikon F mount ever produced.
Besides cosmetics, this new version adds a NAI metering prong for even the oldest Nikon SLR meters in addition to AIS metering and being chipped for digital Nikons DSLRs.

These new versions also have a smaller 52mm filter size (previous 58mm).

IN STOCK AND SHIPPING
$599 with free next day shipping to most lower 48 locations.
Black/Chrome Version Black Version

Thanks for looking,

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #2
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090

Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f1.4 Retro look by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr
Got mine last week. Looking the part, thats for sure. Image quality promises to be rally top notch. It is the same formula as the older version of the 58mm f1.4 from a couple of years ago.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #3
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,551
Is there a nice hood with the lens? Usually that is Voigtländers weak point.

Erik.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #4
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090
Eric, there is a nifty screw-in hood. Advantage is that it stays in place and doesn't fall off like the clip on Nikkor ones. A major advantage is that it will also work on the old 58mm f1.4 or any other Nikkor 50mm lens with 52mm thread. I had an original hood for the Nikkor 58mm f1.4 - but it fell off and rolled into the sea!!!!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #5
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090

Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f1.4 retro look by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr

The new Nokton 58mm f1.4 at f1.4 and closest focus. The focus is on the K in Knausgård. Shot with Sony A7.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #6
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom A View Post
I had an original hood for the Nikkor 58mm f1.4 - but it fell off and rolled into the sea!!!!!!
That is why I use screw-in shades on my Nikkors since 1971!

On the Nikkor-H Auto 50mm 1:2 f=50mm - a very nice lens - I do not use a shade at all as the glass elements are deeply recessed into the mount.

Erik.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #7
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom A View Post
Ot is the same formula as the older version of the 58mm f1.4 from a couple of years ago.
Is the front element size the same, even though they went from a 58mm filter thread to 52mm?
I'm wondering if that reduction would cause vignetting.

Gorgeous lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #8
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom A View Post
Eric, there is a nifty screw-in hood.
Does it come with the lens, or has to be purchased separately?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #9
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss View Post
Does it come with the lens, or has to be purchased separately?
I don't know if it is included with the lens here. Check with Stephen on that.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #10
LarsAC
Registered User
 
LarsAC is offline
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: A darkroom in Germany
Posts: 81
Has the optical design been changed from the former version ?

Lars
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #11
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsAC View Post
Has the optical design been changed from the former version ?

Lars

"Same lens construction as previous Voigtlander 58mm F1.4 SLIIN"

Not sure if lens construction = optical design
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #12
eric4
Registered User
 
eric4's Avatar
 
eric4 is offline
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 34
Will it be released in Pentax K mount too?
__________________
_____________
www.fore.photo
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #13
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,008
Odd that the image quality of a Cosina Voigtlander designed and made product tops a legendary optical firm that gave us the famous 5cm f1.4 lens in S and LTM mount and the spectacular 105mm f2.5 lens that came in S LTM and F mount.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #14
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 5,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
Odd that the image quality of a Cosina Voigtlander designed and made product tops a legendary optical firm that gave us the famous 5cm f1.4 lens in S and LTM mount and the spectacular 105mm f2.5 lens that came in S LTM and F mount.
it does, try it.
specifically I am saying the Voigtlander 58/1.4 is better than any other normal Nikon F mount (50-58mm) f/1.4 lens. Not f/2, not other mounts, not other focal lengths. Generally it will be true.

No Pentax K mount - all the K mount SL lenses are discontinued. Unfortunately no EOS mount or Sony E mount or M mount either, but I keep hoping.

The hood is separate at $59 (same price as previous version)

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #15
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameraQuest View Post
it does, try it.
specifically I am saying the Voigtlander 58/1.4 is better than any other normal Nikon F mount (50-58mm) f/1.4 lens. Not f/2, not other mounts, not other focal lengths. Generally it will be true.

No Pentax K mount - all the K mount SL lenses are discontinued. Unfortunately no EOS mount or Sony E mount or M mount either, but I keep hoping.

The hood is separate at $59 (same price as previous version)

Stephen
CV does make some fantastic lenses, maybe the torch has been passed and now its in the hands of this vibrant firm. It will only get better and better with each passing year.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #16
maryland_fotos
Registered User
 
maryland_fotos is offline
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 459
Sweeeet looking lens! Would rather have that than the plasticky 50 1.8 that came with my Df.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #17
AlwaysOnAuto
Registered User
 
AlwaysOnAuto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 479
So how does this new lens compare to the Minolta 58mm f1.4?

Or is that like comparing apples to kumquats?
__________________
IIIa, M3, some lenses + digital
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #18
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090

The screw-in hood and the lens cap for the Nokton 58mm f1.4. by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr

This is for Eric. The hood for the Nokton 58mm f1.4. Simple, straight sided and screw in. The cap slides over the hood and is incidentally, the same cap as is used on the Heliar Hyper Wide 10mm f5.6
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #19
helenhill
a Click in Time...
 
helenhill's Avatar
 
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Yawk
Posts: 5,143
Great Looking Lens !!
look forward to seeing what it can do
__________________
Flickr.

A Lover of Leica M's...
Best Wishes -H
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2016   #20
CMur12
Registered User
 
CMur12 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Moses Lake, Washington, USA
Age: 65
Posts: 632
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysOnAuto View Post
So how does this new lens compare to the Minolta 58mm f1.4?

Or is that like comparing apples to kumquats?
The Minolta 58mm f1.4 was a 6-element design, which is unusual in a normal lens this fast. My guess is that it is not as well corrected and sharp as the CV lens, though it may have other favorable rendering characteristics.

- Murray
__________________
Still shooting film: Medium Format with assorted TLRs; 35mm with manual-focus Minolta SLRs and a Canonet.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #21
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 6,090

H 332 #11 Halloween - I hope. by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr

First roll out of a F (74xxxxx) with the Nokton 58mm f1.4. Kodak Double X in Pyrocat HD.
Nice tonality and more than sharp enough. If my memory serves me right it was at f2.8 or thereabouts.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #22
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
Odd that the image quality of a Cosina Voigtlander designed and made product tops a legendary optical firm that gave us the famous 5cm f1.4 lens in S and LTM mount and the spectacular 105mm f2.5 lens that came in S LTM and F mount.
Not really. It all comes down to placement in the market. If they make cheap lenses, then the quality won't be so good.

Perfect example is Sigma. They used to make low end budget lenses back in the 80's, 90's etc.
Now their Art series lenses beat the equivalent Nikons optically, and are almost as good as the vaunted Zeiss Otus lenses for much less money.
Sigma decided to move up market. It's the same as what Cosina is doing with its Voigtlander and Zeiss lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #23
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss View Post
Not really. It all comes down to placement in the market. If they make cheap lenses, then the quality won't be so good.

Perfect example is Sigma. They used to make low end budget lenses back in the 80's, 90's etc.
Now their Art series lenses beat the equivalent Nikons optically, and are almost as good as the vaunted Zeiss Otus lenses for much less money.
Sigma decided to move up market. It's the same as what Cosina is doing with its Voigtlander and Zeiss lenses.
Yes, I am aware of all that, Zeiss have always been top shelf primo lenses even in the DDR made lineup when compared to other DDR made lenses.

I got a fast 200mm lens that I bought for use when I was shooting for my High School's yearbook, sports and stage plays and R'n R band concerts (so long ago that I have a hard time remembering it all) and this Sigma made lens was nothing to write home about. I still am prejudiced against Sigma made optics to this very day.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #24
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by radi(c)al_cam View Post
Sorry, that's utter nonsense.
Would Leica have allowed Sigma to make lenses for the Leica R — some nine Sigmas, and two Vario-Elmar-R [!]— if they haven't been very good?

Don't be sorry. The lenses Sigma made for Leica were at a completely different price point and quality level than what Sigma was making for the general public back then.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #25
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
Odd that the image quality of a Cosina Voigtlander designed and made product tops a legendary optical firm....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss View Post
Not really. It all comes down to placement in the market. If they make cheap lenses, then the quality won't be so good.

Perfect example is Sigma. They used to make low end budget lenses back in the 80's, 90's etc.
Now their Art series lenses beat the equivalent Nikons optically, and are almost as good as the vaunted Zeiss Otus lenses for much less money.
Sigma decided to move up market. It's the same as what Cosina is doing with its Voigtlander and Zeiss lenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
Yes, I am aware of all that...
Then what do you find odd?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #26
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,332
Should be a great portrait lens ... and very reasonably priced in my opinion.
__________________
---------------------------
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #27
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss View Post
Then what do you find odd?
I still find it odd because I still associate third tier lens makers with still making third tier lenses and not out doing the big boys.

It is ingrained perception formed many decades ago when it was truer then it is now.

Cosina was Argus Cosina in the 1970s and not Voigtlander, certainly not Carl Zeiss ... and Sigma was a little better than Asanuma and house brands like Hanimex and Spiratone and maybe an equal of house brand Vivitar pre series 1, nothing more.

It is as simple as that really.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #28
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
I still find it odd because I still associate third tier lens makers with still making third tier lenses and not out doing the big boys.

It is ingrained perception formed many decades ago when it was truer then it is now.
Ok I get that. In my camera bag here at work I have a D750 with a 50 1.8G, and the Cosina Zeiss 35 f2 lens. The Nikon 50 1.8G feels like a featherweight disposable piece of plastic in comparison to the Cosina lens.
Optically they are both excellent, with the Cosina Zeiss being a knock out lens.
Times have changed.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #29
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss View Post
Ok I get that. In my camera bag here at work I have a D750 with a 50 1.8G, and the Cosina Zeiss 35 f2 lens. The Nikon 50 1.8G feels like a featherweight disposable piece of plastic in comparison to the Cosina lens.
Optically they are both excellent, with the Cosina Zeiss being a knock out lens.
Times have changed.
Zeiss will always have optics makers like Kyocera or Cosina or anyone else make their Zeiss lenses to Zeiss designs, Zeiss specs and Zeiss standards.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #30
Robert Lai
Registered User
 
Robert Lai is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,267
I found the version II of the 58mm f/1.4 to be so good, especially wide open, that I got rid of my Nikon 50mm lenses. That included the 50mm 1.2 AIS (too much barrel distortion), and a 50mm 1.8 AI. The latter was pretty good, but it has lower contrast wide open compared to the Voigtlander, and the Nikon 1.8 has noticeable barrel distortion when not at infinity. The only Nikon 50mm that I kept was the f/2.8 AIS Micro.

The only thing lacking on version II was the meter coupling prong to mate with my FTN meter on my F. It looks like the new version is the answer to my problem.

As far as quality of construction goes, I see nothing in the version II to indicate that the construction was anything less than first class. It is ALL solid metal and glass. No plastic that I can see.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #31
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,332
Sweet lens for a DF!
__________________
---------------------------
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2016   #32
Daryl J.
Registered User
 
Daryl J. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 246
I'll keep this lens in mind. I use a 55mm F3.5 MicroNikkor mostly and have for some reason shied away from fast 50's from Nikon.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-26-2016   #33
ironhorse
Joe DuPont
 
ironhorse's Avatar
 
ironhorse is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 304
I was disappointed with every Sigma and Tokina lens that I purchase for my Nikons back in the 1980's. Decided to use only Nikon lenses since then for my SLRs. Perhaps it's time to reconsider.
__________________
Regards,

Joe

"The whole point of taking pictures is so that you don’t have to explain things with words." - Elliott Erwitt
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-2016   #34
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 5,328
New Pics put up,
lenses now in stock and shipping.

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-2016   #35
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameraQuest View Post
New Pics put up,
lenses now in stock and shipping.

Stephen
Cool looking lens. Reminds me pre-ai 55/1.2 Nikkor
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-2016   #36
SaveKodak
Registered User
 
SaveKodak is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 504
This guy plus the Techart AF adapter would be a dream on an A7RII.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2016   #37
robert blu
quiet photographer
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 68
Posts: 4,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Sweet lens for a DF!
i think so...but should I buy first the lens or first the DF ?

robert

PS: I think it's a great lens fro my FM2...now
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


my quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-08-2016   #38
LarsAC
Registered User
 
LarsAC is offline
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: A darkroom in Germany
Posts: 81
35 / f2, 58 / f1.4, 105 / f2.5 - three great lenses and only one set of filters - how nice.

Lars
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-08-2016   #39
Bille
Registered User
 
Bille's Avatar
 
Bille is offline
Join Date: Nov 2012
Age: 39
Posts: 655
I might have to get a Nikon body just for this cool looking lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-09-2016   #40
maitani
Registered User
 
maitani's Avatar
 
maitani is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 751
got mine yesterday, full black, great lens, smaller than i expected. both thumbs up for now. get them while stock lasts.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.