Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Zeiss Ikon ZM

Zeiss Ikon ZM This is for the current production Leica M mount Zeiss Ikon camera and lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 01-28-2010   #76
robert blu
Registered User
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 64
Posts: 3,162
Interestin report with good pictures: thanks Avotius. I like the 28 focal length but now the photo/hobby budget is too low !
robert
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


the quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2010   #77
barefoot
talented, but lazy
 
barefoot is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 38
I like the 28mm focal length and have been waffling back and forth between the ZM f/2.8 or the Elmarit-m ASPH. I checked the price of the Leica a few days ago and noticed it had gone up by $200. Then, checking again on the Zeiss, I see it also went up to over $1k.

Anybody else notice this? Maybe I should pony up the bucks before they increase again ....
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-30-2010   #78
fotomeow
name under my name
 
fotomeow's Avatar
 
fotomeow is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,053
From what my economy friend tells me, the value of the US dollar will continue to decline, making the cost of goods, particularly from oversees, continue to increase. My friend, though not a professional per se, advised me to buy now any item that I would be buying in the next 2 years anyway, since the price will continue to rise. The US administration keeps printing more USD, not good to keep inflation down. Im afraid the US economy is worse than what the general masses (including me) realize.........so about buying that nice piec of glass now vs later??.........
__________________
--> Gary G

"HELP: I need an arm for my MOOLY!! (i'm serious, contact me if you know of one that is available!

Galleria RFF
[size=1]old stuff, new stuff, stuff that works and stuff that doesn't.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-09-2010   #79
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,764
Does this lens have a lot of distortion on the M8?
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-09-2010   #80
Avotius
Monster Rancher
 
Avotius's Avatar
 
Avotius is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chongqing, China
Posts: 3,328
I will be able to tell you that in a few weeks when my M8 arrives!
__________________
Flickr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-09-2010   #81
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avotius View Post
I will be able to tell you that in a few weeks when my M8 arrives!
How was it on your M6? The thing about the newest Elmarit is that it has no real distortion. However, $2000 is a lot to me. If I can pay half and still have a great lens, then...

Using a 28mm with a lot of distortion (like the Ultron 28mm) as your 37mm on a M8 isn't ideal.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-09-2010   #82
akremer
Registered User
 
akremer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 129
i'm ready to get the 28 2.8 for my G2 - cheers
__________________
adamkremer.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2010   #83
Riverman
Registered User
 
Riverman is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 239
Does anyone know what sort of finder blockage I might experience with the f2.8 28mm Biogon on an M6 0.58?

Just picked up an M6 (my first M) and I want to mount a ZM lens on it. I can't decide between the 35mm or 28mm. I want to keep the set up as compact as possible so for 28mm I'm also thinking about the Voigt f3.5 and the Elmarit Asph. But this Biogon looks like a really cracking lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2010   #84
MCTuomey
Registered User
 
MCTuomey's Avatar
 
MCTuomey is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: U.S.
Age: 59
Posts: 2,771
i'd say about 8-10% of the finder, with the hood. subjectively, it feels like a fair amount of blockage. if size is important, the c-biogon 35/2.8 is quite a bit more compact than the 28/2.8.
__________________
Mike

Bill Pierce's "photographer's proposition": I saw something wonderful, let me show it to you.

Leica and Zeiss M
Minolta Autocord
Fuji GX680 (in process)


My Smugmug Website
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2010   #85
Riverman
Registered User
 
Riverman is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 239
Cheers Mike. The 35mm Biogon is the other lens I have my eye on and it's a focal length I'm very comfortable with so is probably the way I'll go. I see from your sig that you also have a 50mm ZM. Is it the f2?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2010   #86
MCTuomey
Registered User
 
MCTuomey's Avatar
 
MCTuomey is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: U.S.
Age: 59
Posts: 2,771
R'man, i have the 50/2, also the c-sonnar 50/1.5. both very nice, though the sonnar gets more use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Cheers Mike. The 35mm Biogon is the other lens I have my eye on and it's a focal length I'm very comfortable with so is probably the way I'll go. I see from your sig that you also have a 50mm ZM. Is it the f2?
__________________
Mike

Bill Pierce's "photographer's proposition": I saw something wonderful, let me show it to you.

Leica and Zeiss M
Minolta Autocord
Fuji GX680 (in process)


My Smugmug Website
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-02-2010   #87
Nick De Marco
Registered User
 
Nick De Marco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
Avotius thank you very much for such a good report and some wonderful punchy photographs
I have recently been getting back into Zeiss lenses with my RFs, maybe because I have been using them with Hasselblad and Rollei.
I recently bough the Zeiss Ikon ZM, and had to get a 35/2 Biogon as its 'lens caps' as the reviews of that lens, and the look of the colur especially, really impressed me. I have just run a couple of films through it and so shall report back soon.

I have also picked up the 25/2.8, second hand. A lens I used to have and sold, as back then I used it on the M8 and then sold the m8 (never really getting on to well with it). As I have CV lenses (old ones) for 28 and 21, and an old 21 Elmarit, and as I remember how sharp the 25/2.8 is I thought it would be good to get back, not least as my Voigtlander R4A has 25mm framelines, and it could be a kind of standard lens on the R4a

The Zeiss Ikon, like the M6 of course, only goes to 28 framelines. Of course I can get an accessory viewfinder, but I have to admit I have been tempted again to buying one steller 28mm lens for thse bodies. The Summicron would be me first choice if it was half the price. I have had, and sold, the Elmarit before. A nice lens, especially if you like small size, but nothing to scream about.

In your opinion is the Zeiss 28/2.8 so good that it is worth adding to a cople of old (pre 28/2 ulton) CV lenses and a Zeiss 25/2.8, or is it unlikely, as I fear, to give me much more than I already have? only wondered as I saw a used one going for a good price.,.....
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-02-2010   #88
Mister E
-
 
Mister E is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: I <3 NCPS
Posts: 1,698
Great write-up, cute girlfriend!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2010   #89
le vrai rdu
Registered User
 
le vrai rdu's Avatar
 
le vrai rdu is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paris
Age: 28
Posts: 1,344
I am using this lens in contax G mount and I have to say it is really impressive
__________________
SITE WEB|| flickr||my book : North Sea ||blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2010   #90
Avotius
Monster Rancher
 
Avotius's Avatar
 
Avotius is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chongqing, China
Posts: 3,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick De Marco View Post
Avotius

In your opinion is the Zeiss 28/2.8 so good that it is worth adding to a cople of old (pre 28/2 ulton) CV lenses and a Zeiss 25/2.8, or is it unlikely, as I fear, to give me much more than I already have? only wondered as I saw a used one going for a good price.,.....

In my opinion, dont bother getting yet another lens. You already have the 28 1.9 ultron I would say that is a good way to go. Sure the Zeiss is smaller but.... f1.9! I often wish my 28 was an f2, not because I have needed it, but because I am vain. Read my latest M8 blabber and see some of my new 28mm photos. http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...ad.php?t=96737


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister E View Post
Great write-up, cute girlfriend!
She is my wife now!
__________________
Flickr.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2011   #91
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avotius View Post
She is my wife now!
Hooray! Glad to hear it.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2011   #92
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,764
So, why did Zeiss choose to make this focus to .5 meters? I hated how it added so much to the focus throw so I sold it. However, looking back at the photos, it had the best look of the 28mm lenses I've owned.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-24-2012   #93
irq506
just curious
 
irq506's Avatar
 
irq506 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 331
Im very interested in finding an acceptable replacement for a 24 and 35 set. I had thought the ZM28 would be a good mid point but Ive been convinced that the ZM25 is a better lens.. does anyone have color images taken with either lens taken with an X-Pro 1 without any post processing?
__________________
the journey is the destination
http://www.flickr.com/photos/devtank
http://www.devtank.com

I have only good gear.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-24-2012   #94
redisburning
Registered User
 
redisburning's Avatar
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotomeow View Post
From what my economy friend tells me, the value of the US dollar will continue to decline, making the cost of goods, particularly from oversees, continue to increase. My friend, though not a professional per se, advised me to buy now any item that I would be buying in the next 2 years anyway, since the price will continue to rise. The US administration keeps printing more USD, not good to keep inflation down. Im afraid the US economy is worse than what the general masses (including me) realize.........so about buying that nice piec of glass now vs later??.........
well, since someone necro'd

2 years are more than up. lower than moderate inflation but prices still rise because of the yen to dollar exchange rate and shortages of Leica gear.

well, the truth is that you should always look for an excuse to buy now, rather than later when it comes to lenses

irq as far as 28 vs 25 go, well a flat field is good for some things, and if youre going to buy a camera with the wrong size sensor it's probably better than hoping the field curvature works out right. I suspect corners on the ZM 28/2.8 will be very weak on any APS-c camera, though they are fine on film / M9
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:35.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.