Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Fixed Lens RF

Fixed Lens RF This forum is dedicated to the numerous and popular fixed lens rangefinders, including but not limited to the Canon Canonets, Konica III and S series, Minoltas, Ricohs, Vivitars, and so many others. Note fixed lens Olympus , Yashicas, Argus and Retina have separate forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

A Super short Review of the Contax T Rangefinder
Old 08-04-2012   #1
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
A Super short Review of the Contax T Rangefinder

A Super short Review of the Contax T Rangefinder

The Contax T is the first of the premium compact
T series cameras from Contax/Kyocera.

First introduced in 1984, the Contax T is a true
rangefinder unlike the subsequent models (T2, T3 and TvS)
where were more of a premium Point & Shoot cameras.

This camera isn't very well known now because it is quite rare,
but in the hey-days it was used by celebrated photographers
HCB and Costa Manos.

Here is a picture of famous fashion photographer Mario Testino using
a well-used black Contax T. Next to him is Mariah Carey.
My silver contaxt T is in the foreground with the attached flash.




Comparison with the other Compact RFs

I find the Contax T fascinating, it is as-if the designers
took the best bits from the other great compacts and crammed it
into this camera with enhancements:

* RF patch is diamond-shaped (Yashica-GSN/Minolta Hi-matic)

* Form factor is similar to the Minox 35, Rollei 35, Olympus XA

* Flash Attachment is similar to the XA but unlike the Oly A11 flash
which is underpowered with a GN of 10, the Contax T flash T14 has a
GN of 14m (2xAA batteries vs 1 for the XA)

* Aperture Priority similar to the Minox and XA

* The Cover flips like the Minox 35.

* Film advance lever like the Minox but is a single-stroke lever unlike the double
found on the Minox.

* Film loading like the Rollei 35

* The ISO reaches a max of 1000 versus the 800 for the XA, Minox

(to be contined...)
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #2
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Using the Contax T

Well, this thing is small but heavy. How heavy ? I think if i loop
the Camera strap around my neck, I risk slapping myself into unconsciousness
from the Contax T if I attempt to run.

But just like the XA is a bit too light, and the Rollei 35 is a bit too heavy,
the heaviness of the Contax T is offset by the nicely done thumb grip on the camera,
the risk of the camera slipping is quite small.

A more irritating issue is the camera cover, it is a bit unnatural to walk around for street
photography with the cover flipped opened unlike the XA which slides open easily and
unobstrusely.

However, I complain too much. This Sonnar 38/f2.8 camera is a beautiful camera
and it takes beautiful pictues, even if my Contax T RF patch is a bit mis-aligned at f2.8.

Here are some pictures of beautiful people:










All captured on the Contax-T mostly at f2.8. Film is the self-rolled Ilford XP-2.

Fin. Thanks for viewing.

raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #3
JMQ
Registered User
 
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 395
Yes Raytoei, the Contax T is a beautiful all-metal camera with decent exposure control. I'd add that it has a super quiet shutter, and without the flash, is quite a compact camera for its day. I bought one in 1984, and used it for many years until I dropped it. Bought 2 more in in the late 1990s. I have both the chrome and black models, which are sadly shelf-queens these days. BTW, Dante Stella has a great review on the Contax T on his site.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #4
Murchu
Registered User
 
Murchu is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ireland
Age: 34
Posts: 600
Now, this is my kind of review. Short, sweet, to the point, and with as much emphasis on pictures as text. I like it - well done
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #5
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 803
nice description. i love mine as it is truly pocketable, but has a wonderful lens. i read cartier-bresson was a huge fan.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #6
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbelyell View Post
nice description. i love mine as it is truly pocketable, but has a wonderful lens. i read cartier-bresson was a huge fan.
+1

My all time favorite pocket rf camera...

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #7
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Age: 52
Posts: 1,737
The Contax T is my "special occasion" pocket 35.

Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #8
Bob
Leica M User
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Bob is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 145
I fell in love with the "T" when it first came out.
Bought a chrome one in LA when it was first available. Later I bought a black one. Both complete with flash.

I still have both, and treat them with respect. The black one is still like new.
The build quality is second to none, and the shutter is super quite.

To bad it is so tough to get them serviced. I'm constantly on the look out for good qualified service technicians. Just in case

I envy those who have one, you know what you've got
__________________
Best Always
Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #9
kdemas
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,152
Loved my Ts, I had a black and silver one. The only thing I didn't like was the film loading, PITA.

Great camera.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------
Open Iris. Life, Captured.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #10
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
I love using the T2. It is "95% as good" as the older T.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #11
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
Would you today buy a T over a later model?
The market value of a T can vary a lot.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #12
JMQ
Registered User
 
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Would you today buy a T over a later model?
The market value of a T can vary a lot.
Dear Raid,
Absolutely! The T is all manual -- ok, aperture preferred, but you can do exposure compensation. The RF is "real", and focus is manual. It size (w/o the detachable flash) is about a pack of cigarettes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #13
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Would you today buy a T over a later model?
The market value of a T can vary a lot.
In a heartbeat, if i were to do it over again now. I have two of them as well.. One black and the other is chrome. Every once in awhile I am tempted to buy a third one.

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #14
Highway 61
Revisited
 
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by raytoei@gmail.com View Post
Here is a picture of famous fashion photographer Mario Testino using a well-used black Contax T.
Rather looks to be a black TVS III.

I have owned two Contax T cameras, both got a defective CPU eventually, making them totally useless and unrepairable.

Very disappointing and overrated compact 35mm camera, but for its lens. The camera inwards are all plastic ; the film advance mechanism is clumsy (frequent frames overlapping) ; the RF base is so short that it's more of a marketing tip than a useful tool in the field.

The all-mechanical Rollei 35 is a much more serious camera...
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #15
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highway 61 View Post
Rather looks to be a black TVS III.

I have owned two Contax T cameras, both got a defective CPU eventually, making them totally useless and unrepairable.

Very disappointing and overrated compact 35mm camera, but for its lens. The camera inwards are all plastic ; the film advance mechanism is clumsy (frequent frames overlapping) ; the RF base is so short that it's more of a marketing tip than a useful tool in the field.

The all-mechanical Rollei 35 is a much more serious camera...
Sorry to hear about your problems. I guess I have been lucky with both of mine.

Bought my first brand new when they first came out and the second one about three years later. So far not a single problem with either of them... Knock on wood

I had the Rollei 35s as well both the Sonnar and Tessar. I liked the Contax much better. They both take great pictures and at end of the day that all that really counts.

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #16
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
The T2 has the same lens as the T. It is a great street camera with its AF for quick shots.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2012   #17
dexdog
sans bokeh
 
dexdog's Avatar
 
dexdog is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,455
I used to have one of these cameras. Great shooters, much better/more functional/easier to use than the various Minox compacts, and sleeker than the compact Rollei 35s. Mine was ripped off at a youth hostel in Australia. I loved my Rollei 35SE, but the Contax T was way cooler. Lost the 35SE when a 7 foot deep trench collapsed on me while doing field work.
__________________
_____________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2012   #18
Rico
Registered User
 
Rico's Avatar
 
Rico is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 806
The Contax T is a great street machine: unnoticed, shutter instantaneous and silent. Film loading is at least as easy as my Barnack.
__________________

Rico Tudor. Leica M4, IIIb, 28, 35, 50, 90, 135, 280. Contax T, RTS; Canon; Nikon; Profoto
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2012   #19
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,845
Rico,

you are right, the LTM barnack cameras are quite finicky in terms of film loading. Didn't have any problems with film loading, even with self-rolled film.

raytoei
__________________
------------------------------------
Film is Photography.
------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.